Sigh... the climate will change Zip. No amount of electronic bank transfers will stop it. Try again.
And perhaps you should get a Grade 6 understanding of spelling.
TOTAL FAIL
Climate Change Deniers Are Having A Very Bad Year
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
And perhaps you should get a Grade 6 understanding of spelling.
TOTAL FAIL
And no amount of obfuscation is going to change the radiative properties of a carbon dioxide molecule.
I happen to be an excellent speller. Just a really lousy typer. :lol: Besides, with respect to climate change, it's the science and not the spelling that is the relevant skill requried.
You've got a half a dozen guys on this site who claim the world is cooling. Here's a newsflash--there are virtually no scinetists who are saying the world is cooling. All the heavyweights on the skeptical side of things--Lindzen, Dyson, Daly--all readily admit that the temperature is increasing. Virtually all skeptical scinetists argue that the IPCC models are flawed, the claite sensitivity is wrong, the warming is primarily natural, or the arming won't be catastrophic. None of them are arguing that the world is actually cooling.
Across the entire planet, there's no denying there is a whole lot of water where there used to be ice.
You mean the late Pleistocene/early Holocene. The chart does need to start at at least 1Ka but 20Ka will give a far better idea of "global average".
.
If you aren't going to look at this in proper scientific perspective, f-ck off and die.
If we have ice free ports in the north we'll be able to ship more oil that we need
shorter distances. Of course there is climate change and easy word to use as
climate change has gone on since the beginning of time. The fact is it is a natural
occurrence and will continue as long as time exists and there is nothing we can do
about it Whenever the granola people get on their high horse it makes me want to
go out and start my Silverado V8 up and let it run for a while.
shorter distances. Of course there is climate change and easy word to use as
climate change has gone on since the beginning of time. The fact is it is a natural
occurrence and will continue as long as time exists and there is nothing we can do
about it Whenever the granola people get on their high horse it makes me want to
go out and start my Silverado V8 up and let it run for a while.
I hear you but I think we have to remember one thing and that is animals (human and others) are contributing to climate change and partly at least in proportion to the population. I would amend "nothing" to "not much".
I'm almost embarrassed for the so-called scientists that try to ignore ancient weather patterns (which is really like a large number poll vs just asking your neighbor).
these self-proclaimed, self-aggrandizing, self-righteous eggheads with their charts 'n' graphs du jour would go down with their koolaid lollipop ship than to submit to the obvious only because the 'other side' is there. they would lose face. they're turning japanese.
pretty odd for what should be open-minded um, technicians, sciencey doods, degree-holders of all description...their fanboyz of blowhards, armchair meteorologists, celebrities, social media freaks and geeks, the urban touqes, ows masked types and even alvin gore..
they are visibly upset that their tall agw money-making tale isn't being swallowed no more.
Your question is illogical, and a red herring. I said imbalance. If you understand English- a contentious assertion I realize- an imbalance means a lack of proportion between corresponding things. Like, the energy coming into the planet from space, and the energy that leaves the planet to space.
Normal has nothing to do with the definition of an imbalance.
The reference to your body weight was actually a humorous way of turning your illogical question around. What's been your normal weight over your life time? Probably hasn't been consistent. Yes, just like our climate! But if you consistently take in more energy than you burn, there's going to be a trend. Who cares if it's relative to your 5-10 year old weight, or your 25-30 year old weight? Obviously we care about your current weight more so for things like mitigating risk. Likewise, who cares how much energy came in during the Triassic? It has no relation to our current state, anymore than your weight as a toddler relates to now.
An imbalance in energy into a system and energy out of a system doesn't need a term like normal, in fact it's irrelevant.
Maybe you misunderstood what the term top of the atmosphere energy imbalance means in the climate discussion. Therein lies the problem with folks like you and Colpy-who don't seem to know what the terms are- who think you know better than the people who work in this field.
When the oil in the engine is too cold to allow you to pull out the dipstick does that mean there is enough in it?