Well, you've been pretty busy here tonight, Extrafire. I hardly know where to begin to respond, but for starters I can say that you're quite wrong in what you attribute to Einstein, you've misunderstood his position entirely.
If you're a creationist in the usual sense of that word, you are completely, egregiously, and demonstrably wrong, there's no good evidence that supports your position, no good evidence in support of design that doesn't admit of much more parsimonious explanations, and plenty of reasons for thinking the universe wasn't designed. I'd like to know what you've been reading. David Hume completely demolished the argument from design centuries ago,and all the contemporary arguments advanced in its favour, like those we get from people like Michael Behe and Phillip Johnson, are based on ignorance and misunderstandings and distortions of the evidence.
Is your position that the universe was created by divine fiat over a period of six days about 6 to 10 thousand years ago? That's the conventional creationist view, and it's flatly contradicted by multiple converging lines of evidence from physics, chemistry, astronomy, cosmology, geology, biology, you name it. If conventional creationism is correct, we have to throw away all of that, despite the fact that it's worked so spectacularly well for us in giving us the world of technology that enables us, among other things, to converse like this.
Bluntly, if conventional creationism is correct, the computer that enables you to post here would be an impossible mechanism, because it's based on about 400 years worth of increasing knowledge of physics and chemistry and mathematics that all hang together consistently and predictably, but cannot be true if creationism is correct. In particular, everything we know about radioactive decay must be wrong, and if that's wrong, then everything we know about all nuclear processes must be wrong, and if that's wrong then everything we know about the four basic forces must be wrong, and if that's wrong then everything we know about the behaviour of electrons must be wrong, and if that's wrong then there's no electrical power in your home and your computer doesn't work.
The conventional creationist position is indefensible in the light of modern science, and if that's your position, you are simply wrong from beginning to end.
But if that's not your position, you'd better explain what your position is. You identified yourself as a creationist, so tell us what that means.