No, they don't apply in Quebec, but still in the Constitution. That makes separate-school policy public policy.
Catholic Church up to their old tricks again
- Thread starter personal touch
- Start date
No, they don't apply in Quebec, but still in the Constitution. That makes separate-school policy public policy.
Church wants dumb multipliers to pay tithe. The hard on hate for English (Anglican - aka Protestant) won't help you a bit. You're taking it up the azz from your own
I have absolutely no hate for canadians or anglosaxon world. In fact, I have the same respect for canadians than the respect I have for all other Nation on this planet. Fortunately, because I have to work and make business with peoples all over the world, including people from ROC.
But, historical facts are historical facts. Having a good understanding of facts is mandatory to have an intelligent conversation.
it have been amended in the other federated states also... but different ways.
It's up to all governement to manage it the way they want.
But we also need to look beyond history and consider the present. Just to take one example: imagine ATCs and pilots insisting on speaking French over the radio at Trudeau International Airport because of Quebec's history. Historical facts need to be tempered by technical and pragmatic facts too.
Canada signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. So why do we still have separate schools in Ontario?
As long as it's possible to a Québec pilot to communicate in french with the airport.... I don't see any problem with it.
To be honest I don't mind of what happen in Ontario. The canadians should do what they want to do. I don't care.
The secular schools is a demand from the immigrants religious community in Ontario. Not from francophones. It's up to canadians to give it or not.... again, to be honest, it's far to be an issue for me. It's an "all canadians" debate. We got this debate in Québec long time ago.
So you want to be a part of a country that violates the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights?
Firstly, St Albert Alberta was that way many years ago, secondly, same thing in many native communities.
I am not sure that we can say that it is violates the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights but, yes, I don't really mind is it's in the ROC or in any other country.
The UNHCHR has officially stated that the separate school system violated the non-discriminaton provision of the ICCPR.
Ok
I don't know who/what are UNHCHR and ICCPR... but.... that's the problem of the ROC... if it's a problem. I don't care.
UN High Commission for Human Rights and the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights.
Also, the ICCPR does not distinguish between provinces, or Quebec or Ontario. Its official criticisim is always against the state, Canada and so reflects badly on Quebec too. In the same way, when the UNHCCPR had criticized parts of BIll 101 for violating the ICCPR, it did not criticize Quebec for it, but Canada, again, making all of Canada look bad.
Canada is a federation. I am sure that they know that at UN. If they don't.... I do.
Now, I can't tell how bad is this "blame" because I am not aware of this affair... and like I said, I have no interest in it as long as I don't feel concerned by this.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms has been a disaster.. and has fomented a judicial tyranny in this country.. by an arrogant and completely unaccountable SCOC.. which has declared itself to be a law unto itself.
The Catholic Church, providing you discern exactly what it's message is through its opaque political bureacracy and mixed messages, and by way of its dogmas on faith, liberty and morals..in fact offers the only path to true freedom.. the Way, the Truth and the Life.
That is something that Justin Trudeau, our drooling dolt of a PM and the arch 'post' Catholic politician has nary an inkling of understanding.
The Catholic Church, providing you discern exactly what it's message is through its opaque political bureacracy and mixed messages, and by way of its dogmas on faith, liberty and morals..in fact offers the only path to true freedom.. the Way, the Truth and the Life.
That is something that Justin Trudeau, our drooling dolt of a PM and the arch 'post' Catholic politician has nary an inkling of understanding.
Last edited:
theoriticly yes...
but no... it's not what I mean...
sorry, a should precise that I agree that the Charter is a complete desaster.
theoriticly yes...
but no... it's not what I mean...
sorry, a should precise that I agree that the Charter is a complete desaster.
Everyone from the far right to the far left, Quebec sovereignists, indigenous people, federalists, world federalists, religionists and secularists with half a brain can agree to that. And people say Canadians can't find something to agree on!
Everyone from the far right to the far left, Quebec sovereignists, indigenous people, federalists, world federalists, religionists and secularists with half a brain can agree to that. And people say Canadians can't find something to agree on!
The problem is to find agreement on its revision.
Does anyone know what this thread was supposed to be about?
Is it that they won't perform last rites and funerals for Dr assisted suicides or something lse?
Is it that they won't perform last rites and funerals for Dr assisted suicides or something lse?
Everyone from the far right to the far left, Quebec sovereignists, indigenous people, federalists, world federalists, religionists and secularists with half a brain can agree to that. And people say Canadians can't find something to agree on!
Quebecers and canadians agree on this but for opposite reason most of the time ;-)
It's like Charlottetown agreement
i have been told that were canadians and Quebecers share the same point of view is about the shoes removing in the house.