Would President Bush go to war to stop Tehran from getting the bomb?
http://www.gnn.tv/headlines/8473/The_Iran_Plans
Headlines : "War on Terror" - The Iran Plans
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:17:55 -0700
Bush has all but announced his plans to bomb Iran. The real reason is likely along the lines of Iran refusing to stop pumping so much oil and it is really messing up the OPEC efforts to get the price of crude oil above $100bbl. Or changing to payment in Euros. or teaming up with Venezueala to usurp OPEC and reduce the cost of gasoline to a reasonable price to the average person...
Whatever the reasons - the publicly announced reasons, corporate reasons, personal or professional reasons - that Bush has for invading Iran, he will tell us it is for America's safety. "A Post9-11 World" you know... such a dangerous place... see all those dead americans lying in american streets? Such a dangerous place now that those terrorists are running amok there anymore.... [sarcasm].
what dream is this??
Who would swallow this story again, right on the heels of Plamegate where Bush "illegally dangerously dishonourably" outs an American agent who provided us with the truth about one of Bush's fear-mongering tales of danger emerging from some Islamic nation across the seas [yellow-cake Nuke material was NOT going from Africa to Saddam, as Bush had warned us , as a reason for going to war on Iraq].
you might... If you still believe in Santa and the tooth fairy.
Thats Tough, but you gotta hear it.
It aint real , dudes
- ITS ABOUT THE OIL, allways has been:
1953 overthrow of govt of IRAN:
http://www.buzzflash.com/reviews/06/04/rev06051.html
[book review "Overthrow", has bit on Iran regime change 1953]
When he says it is for safety, well it is LESS safe for Americans after America changes governments and occupies Islamic nations [duh, who woulda thunk that eh?], most experts and me agree:
[urlhttp://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040806B.shtml[/url]
I am waiting to see how PM Harper will respond to questions of his support for Bush's plans to do a regime change in Iran. We should ask him, it would make him squirm a bit eh.
http://www.gnn.tv/headlines/8473/The_Iran_Plans
Headlines : "War on Terror" - The Iran Plans
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:17:55 -0700
Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reports that the Bush administration is planning to launch a massive bombing campaign against Iran, and it may include the use of bunker-busting nuclear weapons. A former defense official said “the military planning was premised on the belief that ‘a sustained bombing campaign in Iran will humiliate the religious leadership and lead the public to rise up and overthrow the government.’” This strategy has been met with resistance from some military officials who warn that it could destabilize the region and encourage [NUCLEAR] attacks against Americans.
Bush has all but announced his plans to bomb Iran. The real reason is likely along the lines of Iran refusing to stop pumping so much oil and it is really messing up the OPEC efforts to get the price of crude oil above $100bbl. Or changing to payment in Euros. or teaming up with Venezueala to usurp OPEC and reduce the cost of gasoline to a reasonable price to the average person...
Whatever the reasons - the publicly announced reasons, corporate reasons, personal or professional reasons - that Bush has for invading Iran, he will tell us it is for America's safety. "A Post9-11 World" you know... such a dangerous place... see all those dead americans lying in american streets? Such a dangerous place now that those terrorists are running amok there anymore.... [sarcasm].
what dream is this??
Who would swallow this story again, right on the heels of Plamegate where Bush "illegally dangerously dishonourably" outs an American agent who provided us with the truth about one of Bush's fear-mongering tales of danger emerging from some Islamic nation across the seas [yellow-cake Nuke material was NOT going from Africa to Saddam, as Bush had warned us , as a reason for going to war on Iraq].
you might... If you still believe in Santa and the tooth fairy.
Thats Tough, but you gotta hear it.
It aint real , dudes
- ITS ABOUT THE OIL, allways has been:
1953 overthrow of govt of IRAN:
http://www.buzzflash.com/reviews/06/04/rev06051.html
[book review "Overthrow", has bit on Iran regime change 1953]
When he says it is for safety, well it is LESS safe for Americans after America changes governments and occupies Islamic nations [duh, who woulda thunk that eh?], most experts and me agree:
[urlhttp://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040806B.shtml[/url]
I am waiting to see how PM Harper will respond to questions of his support for Bush's plans to do a regime change in Iran. We should ask him, it would make him squirm a bit eh.