Search results

au contraire Mr. Dark... I have had much to say about the Pentagon's formal statements on the threats related to climate change - in the past I've quoted directly from assorted past Pentagon Quadrennial Defense Review reports to that end. As an alternate change-up, here's a Pentagon Report...

taxi... still? You've made no progress with your graph phobia while I've been away? None? fixating on the symbolic aspect of Canada's domestic emissions production is a well-worn, tired and weak practice for those who choose to ignore emission outsourcing and emissions associated with exported...

seriously? Do you not equate increased emissions within increased industrialization? The graphic clearly outlines the increasing emissions, by timeline... you can't make the association? Really? there's an expectation the recent U.S.- China emissions reduction agreement will set the tone for...

if you've got nothing substantive and thread related to add, sometimes holding back your attempts at humour might serve you better. Peace Out!

perhaps this handy graphic might give you that perspective - yes?

run a googly - there's no shortage of details on current emission reduction initiatives China has enacted and continues to bring forward. Dealing with rapid industrialization is a most pressing concern to the Chinese government... whether you're willing to accept that fact or not.

China's INDC submission to COP 21... English translation begins on page 17 - enjoy!

my work is done here for today! :mrgreen: CUlater azzholes

you still don't get it! You and your clubhouseBROs mean nothing to me! Laugh away lapping, lapper, lapdog, DuhSleeper

it seems your, uhhh... claimed "independent thought" always breaks down when someone asks you to actually support/substantiate yet another of your statements/claims. You know... the ones you provide no support for... the ones you can't/won't substantiate.

that's it Locutus... that's all ya got... after I punted yet another of your stooopid C&P specials from your regular go-to denier blogger 'Goddard'. That's all ya got? :mrgreen:

those no qualitative measurement involved. Again, it's not a negative slag... there's no perjorative intent. It's simply a label; a statement of fact in relation to positions held. You hold a particular denier position... you're a denier in that regard - no more, no less. You should really look...

simple mind you have! But hey now, since your loyal lapper DuhSleeper has resurrected it once again: why don't you step-up and acknowledge YOUR LIES about Machu Picchu! You know, where you claimed "NO BUSES, NO BUS ROAD". You know, where I showcased YOUR LIES by posting BUS PICS, the ROAD BUSES...

and the principal lapdog surfaces! Again, you also have questions awaiting you... that you're forever running away from. You know, the questions that have to do with you repeatedly stating that, "you have NO REASON/BASIS to claim I lied about visiting Machu Picchu"... and that, "you need NO...

oh my! Such an internet warrior you are! :mrgreen: But hey now... I said no such thing... you shouldn't let your wet dreams carry into the day time! it seems you have a denier block here! Homogenisation is science!!! Surely you're not for accepting inherent biases in the data, are you? Hey...

do you keep it over you 'big swinging dick'? mind your own simpleton business hey Locutus... do I also have the ability to "make you post where I want"? :mrgreen:

you still smartin' ger? Are you finally ready... finally willing... to state your position and unequivocally show that you're not the denier I've stated you are? C'mon... you have my (now stated several times) commitment to provide you an apology... if you simply answer the questions I posed to...

says YOU, the soil-toiling, fake "earth scientist"! :mrgreen:

:mrgreen: Locutus!!!! C'mon Locutus, for years now the UAH hucksters (Uncle Roy in particular) were adamant that RSS was the outlier. And now this? Of course Locutus, you haven't a clue about satellite measurements... you know, all those adjustments that are made in attempting to estimate...

he's simply following your drywall lead! Since you appear to have no control over your loyal lapdogs, I trust you will exercise more caution in your future marginialization attempts. Your drywall actions have consequences! :mrgreen: