Re: Welcome to NHL Hockey!
Dec 16th, 2011The NHL is a non-profit organization.

i don't condone how mike milbury handled the situation, but at least he came to the defense of his son. if it had been me, my dad would have been happy to see my *** get kicked.

as a coach on a minor team of any kind, his behavior would be an embarrassment to the particular team and
also the league overseeing that team.
these kids are 12 years old, to even suggest any kind of defense of this kind for his son, is unacceptable,
he is the adult and the guardian of these players, all of them, not just his son.
He should be taking the opposite stand in any kind of physical altercation with any of these boys, by
making sure fighting etc., is immediately stopped, and players calmed down, and dealt with by officials,
not him, he shouldn't be stepping out on the ice at any time during the game.
That's a difficult question to answer.
The NHL is not a non-profit organization, but neither is it a business that makes or loses money (similar to the NHLPA).
The NHL is a collection of 30 entities, all of whom participate in the financial well-being of the league.
When you purchase that 30 dollar T-shirt, part of the money goes to the manufacturer, part of the money goes to the merchandiser, and the remainder of the money is split evenly among the 30 teams (regardless of which team's logo). Out of that money, teams pay the league a small percentage (somebody has to pay salaries of the league officials and the rents on their buildings on NYC, Montreal, and Toronto). Any money in excess of what the NHL needs to manage their expenses is passed back to the teams evenly.

I think you're missing the point.
Calling them 'sisters' refers to the idea, promoted on here by our resident Canucks expert, that when faced with rough tough boys, like Boston, they can't 'play their kind of game'.
Or, are you guys now saying that they played exactly 'their kind of game' in the playoffs last year?

I think you're missing the point.
Calling them 'sisters' refers to the idea, promoted on here by our resident Canucks expert, that when faced with rough tough boys, like Boston, they can't 'play their kind of game'.
Or, are you guys now saying that they played exactly 'their kind of game' in the playoffs last year?

No. In last year's play-offs Boston intimidated the referees as well as some of the the Canucks.

I think you're missing the point.
Calling them 'sisters' refers to the idea, promoted on here by our resident Canucks expert, that when faced with rough tough boys, like Boston, they can't 'play their kind of game'.
.

Canucks and the sedins don't play boston's type of game, aren't that type of player,
and if they tried to play like that they wouldn't be successful.

Exactly as I said, then.
So don't be surprised when they're called 'sisters'.

Exactly as I said, then.
So don't be surprised when they're called 'sisters'.

They are not called "sisters" by anyone knowledgable about
the Sedins, or hockey in general. Like all proficient goal
scorers, the Sedins put up with more than their share of
punishment around the net but it doesn't keep them from
leading the scoring race.

I am surprised every time, as I thought grown adults wouldn't be so
very disrespectful, not only to danny and hank, but to women.
...
I am a woman, a
woman who is mature, very sports savvy, and have seen it all.

And they have the Stanley Cup to show for it!
Oh, right, it's the President's Trophy that everyone wants. I forgot.
Then you shouldn't be surprised.
But then again, I'm always amazed at the way some people seem to take personal offense at any insults directed at professional athletes, or on the other hand, take personal pride in the accomplishments of professional athletes. They're just pro athletes, performing a service of providing entertainment.
I take pride in my daughter's teams, and how they do, or not. I don't own any pro teams, or players, so whether they're up or down has nothing to do with me.

Totally. Any one who calls the Sedins "sisters" reveals their extreme ignorance.