More...


Tonington, it's not as simple as that and you know it. Immigration source countries have completely shifted and if this continues annually into the far future you will have a country that will be far different than the Canada seen 30 years ago or today. The question remains: are Canadians fully aware of any and all implications of becoming a far different country than what is seen today? What pressures will exist in 50 years on our current institutions, traditions and values that don't exist now? Actions have consequences. Canada is alone in pursuing immigration so aggressively. When you're a small population country huge change is possible within this century. I look at the recent uproar in Toronto over Hindus wanting to deposit their ashes in local rivers. It's a reminder that we should be fully aware of what can be expected over the next half century as growing and increasingly demanding non-traditional communities assert their interests. We are entitled to know exactly what it is we're getting into.

Tonington, it's not as simple as that and you know it. Immigration source countries have completely shifted and if this continues annually into the far future you will have a country that will be far different than the Canada seen 30 years ago or today. The question remains: are Canadians fully aware of any and all implications of becoming a far different country than what is seen today? What pressures will exist in 50 years on our current institutions, traditions and values that don't exist now? Actions have consequences. Canada is alone in pursuing immigration so aggressively. When you're a small population country huge change is possible within this century. I look at the recent uproar in Toronto over Hindus wanting to deposit their ashes in local rivers. It's a reminder that we should be fully aware of what can be expected over the next half century as growing and increasingly demanding non-traditional communities assert their interests. We are entitled to know exactly what it is we're getting into.

And will that MP represent his constituents' views first or that of his party? And if he chooses the former will he be allowed to run in the next election given that party leaders approve all candidates? And if he chooses to represent his electors will he cede the right to any committee position and possible cabinet placement to others who aren't as responsive to their constituency?
I might as well talk to the wall.

Gilbert, we do need to be more cautious. If Canada felt more like a democracy I might be more comfortable thinking local views would carry to parliament. But there is a divorce between Ottawa and the 300 odd ridings that contribute to it as wide as the Atlantic. Parliament is agenda driven but whose agenda is it?