Bush Bombs Iran Next - Will use Nukes

Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reports that the Bush administration is planning to launch a massive bombing campaign against Iran, and it may include the use of bunker-busting nuclear weapons. A former defense official said “the military planning was premised on the belief that ‘a sustained bombing campaign in Iran will humiliate the religious leadership and lead the public to rise up and overthrow the government.’” This strategy has been met with resistance from some military officials who warn that it could destabilize the region and encourage [NUCLEAR] attacks against Americans.

I been following Mr Hersh for a while now and he speaks the truth, Uncle Sam's going to attack Iran to save us from the Islamic hordes and Bush will install in America a Christian Fundamentaist Theocracy. It's time for Canada to separate from this madness and get on the correct side of the global issues, we need a CLA (Canadian Liberation Army), I,ll be signing up as soon as it happens.

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver

I been following Mr Hersh for a while now and he speaks the truth, Uncle Sam's going to attack Iran to save us from the Islamic hordes and Bush will install in America a Christian Fundamentaist Theocracy. It's time for Canada to separate from this madness and get on the correct side of the global issues, we need a CLA (Canadian Liberation Army), I,ll be signing up as soon as it happens.

That shouldn't be too hard, you can hijack Air Canada and start ramming them into office towers, or even cheaper, strap a few vest bombs around 14 year old kids, that would most notably place you on the "correct" side which you seek.

your suggestion beaver should engage in terrorist acts is mistaken
the canadian liberation army is just and mercifull and only operates in a defensive capability
in contrast to the american imperial army of aggresssion

just keep trollong along ITN

Quote: Originally Posted by cortezzz

your suggestion beaver should engage in terrorist acts is mistaken
the canadian liberation army is just and mercifull and only operates in a defensive capability
in contrast to the american imperial army of aggresssion

just keep trollong along ITN

No I'm not mistaken, he has made these statements in prior threads, he referred to them as "freedom fighters", it's all a point of view, he has his, and I have mine. For example it is my point of view that your reference to American Imperialism has actually prevented the spread of socialism/communism the world over.

You're welcome

You must be blind ITN American Imperialism is the greatest socialist tool ever made, you can't win, you can't even back out gracefully,you're finished. hahahahahahahah

Quote: Originally Posted by cortezzz

your suggestion beaver should engage in terrorist acts is mistaken
the canadian liberation army is just and mercifull and only operates in a defensive capability
in contrast to the american imperial army of aggresssion

For example it is my point of view that your reference to American Imperialism has actually prevented the spread of socialism/communism the world over.

You're welcome

american atrocities in latin america have created the left there
for example
didnt you yourself say that at one point-- or was it toro
i think it was you and it struck me a little out of character for you

verdad.....

Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaver

You must be blind ITN American Imperialism is the greatest socialist tool ever made, you can't win, you can't even back out gracefully,you're finished. hahahahahahahah

And you find it funny if we go down you're coming along for the ride? That is indeed amusing. Perhaps you should diversify your economy before you hope for such an event, you would be in alot better position to be laughing from afar.

It's called making a sacrifice for the children of tommorow, I would see them not have to listen to corporate imperial bull****.

Quote: Originally Posted by cortezzz

american atrocities in latin america have created the left there
for example
didnt you yourself say that at one point-- or was it toro
i think it was you and it struck me a little out of character for you

verdad.....

Yes it was me, I only took exception to Castro's little jungle revolutions all over Latin America funded by the Soviets. Other than that, America's paranoia in reference to communism (especially during the 50's and 60's) shed plenty of blood in Latin America - needlessly.

The left was created (in part) by American interventions in Latin America, but not only American intervention.

of course not only by american interventions
as a reaction to very real right wing repression-- domestic
and just plain exploitation
my query was why do you take exception to the latin american case--
could it be that american interventions-- but not only american interventions have significantly contributed to radicalisation of the middle east

for example the USs--unequivacol support of isreal-- to the detriment of the palestinians

or supporting the repressive shah of iran

or supporting the taliban against the soviets

or supporting saddam against iran

or supporting the saud royal family- i mean is saudi-- a democrasy
doesnt look like one

could the mighty US perhaps thru its influence turn saudi into a democrasy--- without firing a bullet--- does it want to,...

of course no one is innocent here
but come on-- nuking iran..
that would freak the world out
even if its towards industrial targets

it would accelerate the proliferation of nukes worldwide

what do you think would happen if iran got nukes before the states stopped them---
you really think that iran would nuke isreal--- a nuclear power itself--
that talk of their leadership is rhetoric-- and their leadership is crap-- i agree
but then again---americas leadership right now is also crap pure crap

but agian why would they REALLY nuke isreal---
it would be suicide----

you think that this iran-- nuking isreal scenario would be the ultimate suicide attack......

come on and show some compassion for the persians and arabs--the common folk-- they are as much --hermanos-- as the latin americans

I suppose the "correct" side in your mind is Iran's side?

You too want to eliminate Israel Beaver?

Saner commentary here

--

Comments attributed to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian President, saying he wanted to see Israel "wiped off the map" were taken out of context, according to his foreign minister.

This is only an option to use Nuclear bunker busters, as the U.S. Military already has bunker busters that could do the job just as good if it comes to this option in the first place.

Nobody in iran, have said they want to eliminate israel, it is the west media who came up with this story, because the leader of iraan made a speech in front of a university student, and was about "" A world withouth Zionist""