Bush Bombs Iran Next - Will use Nukes

[Karlin]

Would President Bush go to war to stop Tehran from getting the bomb?
http://www.gnn.tv/headlines/8473/The_Iran_Plans
Headlines : "War on Terror" - The Iran Plans
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:17:55 -0700

Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reports that the Bush administration is planning to launch a massive bombing campaign against Iran, and it may include the use of bunker-busting nuclear weapons. A former defense official said “the military planning was premised on the belief that ‘a sustained bombing campaign in Iran will humiliate the religious leadership and lead the public to rise up and overthrow the government.’” This strategy has been met with resistance from some military officials who warn that it could destabilize the region and encourage [NUCLEAR] attacks against Americans.

Bush has all but announced his plans to bomb Iran. The real reason is likely along the lines of Iran refusing to stop pumping so much oil and it is really messing up the OPEC efforts to get the price of crude oil above $100bbl. Or changing to payment in Euros. or teaming up with Venezueala to usurp OPEC and reduce the cost of gasoline to a reasonable price to the average person...


Whatever the reasons - the publicly announced reasons, corporate reasons, personal or professional reasons - that Bush has for invading Iran, he will tell us it is for America's safety. "A Post9-11 World" you know... such a dangerous place... see all those dead americans lying in american streets? Such a dangerous place now that those terrorists are running amok there anymore.... [sarcasm].

what dream is this??
Who would swallow this story again, right on the heels of Plamegate where Bush "illegally dangerously dishonourably" outs an American agent who provided us with the truth about one of Bush's fear-mongering tales of danger emerging from some Islamic nation across the seas [yellow-cake Nuke material was NOT going from Africa to Saddam, as Bush had warned us , as a reason for going to war on Iraq].

you might... If you still believe in Santa and the tooth fairy.
Thats Tough, but you gotta hear it.
It aint real , dudes
- ITS ABOUT THE OIL, allways has been:
1953 overthrow of govt of IRAN:
http://www.buzzflash.com/reviews/06/04/rev06051.html
[book review "Overthrow", has bit on Iran regime change 1953]


When he says it is for safety, well it is LESS safe for Americans after America changes governments and occupies Islamic nations [duh, who woulda thunk that eh?], most experts and me agree:
[urlhttp://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040806B.shtml[/url]


I am waiting to see how PM Harper will respond to questions of his support for Bush's plans to do a regime change in Iran. We should ask him, it would make him squirm a bit eh.

 

[darkbeaver]

RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

I been following Mr Hersh for a while now and he speaks the truth, Uncle Sam's going to attack Iran to save us from the Islamic hordes and Bush will install in America a Christian Fundamentaist Theocracy. It's time for Canada to separate from this madness and get on the correct side of the global issues, we need a CLA (Canadian Liberation Army), I,ll be signing up as soon as it happens.

 

[I think not]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

I been following Mr Hersh for a while now and he speaks the truth, Uncle Sam's going to attack Iran to save us from the Islamic hordes and Bush will install in America a Christian Fundamentaist Theocracy. It's time for Canada to separate from this madness and get on the correct side of the global issues, we need a CLA (Canadian Liberation Army), I,ll be signing up as soon as it happens.

That shouldn't be too hard, you can hijack Air Canada and start ramming them into office towers, or even cheaper, strap a few vest bombs around 14 year old kids, that would most notably place you on the "correct" side which you seek.

 

[zoofer]

I suppose the "correct" side in your mind is Iran's side?

You too want to eliminate Israel Beaver?

Saner commentary here

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/010951.php#comments

 

[cortezzz]

beep beeep beeep
oops sorry
that was my anti-islamic
anti-iranian
anti-palestinian

detector going off

which one of you did that

 

[cortezzz]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

I been following Mr Hersh for a while now and he speaks the truth, Uncle Sam's going to attack Iran to save us from the Islamic hordes and Bush will install in America a Christian Fundamentaist Theocracy. It's time for Canada to separate from this madness and get on the correct side of the global issues, we need a CLA (Canadian Liberation Army), I,ll be signing up as soon as it happens.

That shouldn't be too hard, you can hijack Air Canada and start ramming them into office towers, or even cheaper, strap a few vest bombs around 14 year old kids, that would most notably place you on the "correct" side which you seek.

your suggestion beaver should engage in terrorist acts is mistaken
the canadian liberation army is just and mercifull and only operates in a defensive capability
in contrast to the american imperial army of aggresssion

just keep trollong along ITN

 

[zoofer]

Must be self induced.
Try just carrying one Radical Islamofascist detector instead. I will test it for you.

 

[I think not]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

your suggestion beaver should engage in terrorist acts is mistaken
the canadian liberation army is just and mercifull and only operates in a defensive capability
in contrast to the american imperial army of aggresssion

just keep trollong along ITN

No I'm not mistaken, he has made these statements in prior threads, he referred to them as "freedom fighters", it's all a point of view, he has his, and I have mine. For example it is my point of view that your reference to American Imperialism has actually prevented the spread of socialism/communism the world over.

You're welcome

 

[darkbeaver]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

your suggestion beaver should engage in terrorist acts is mistaken
the canadian liberation army is just and mercifull and only operates in a defensive capability
in contrast to the american imperial army of aggresssion

just keep trollong along ITN

No I'm not mistaken, he has made these statements in prior threads, he referred to them as "freedom fighters", it's all a point of view, he has his, and I have mine. For example it is my point of view that your reference to American Imperialism has actually prevented the spread of socialism/communism the world over.

You're welcome

You must be blind ITN American Imperialism is the greatest socialist tool ever made, you can't win, you can't even back out gracefully,you're finished. hahahahahahahah

 

[I think not]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

You must be blind ITN American Imperialism is the greatest socialist tool ever made, you can't win, you can't even back out gracefully,you're finished. hahahahahahahah

And you find it funny if we go down you're coming along for the ride? That is indeed amusing. Perhaps you should diversify your economy before you hope for such an event, you would be in alot better position to be laughing from afar.

 

[cortezzz]

beep beep beep

 

[cortezzz]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

your suggestion beaver should engage in terrorist acts is mistaken
the canadian liberation army is just and mercifull and only operates in a defensive capability
in contrast to the american imperial army of aggresssion

For example it is my point of view that your reference to American Imperialism has actually prevented the spread of socialism/communism the world over.

You're welcome

american atrocities in latin america have created the left there
for example
didnt you yourself say that at one point-- or was it toro
i think it was you and it struck me a little out of character for you

verdad.....

 

[I think not]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

american atrocities in latin america have created the left there
for example
didnt you yourself say that at one point-- or was it toro
i think it was you and it struck me a little out of character for you

verdad.....

Yes it was me, I only took exception to Castro's little jungle revolutions all over Latin America funded by the Soviets. Other than that, America's paranoia in reference to communism (especially during the 50's and 60's) shed plenty of blood in Latin America - needlessly.

The left was created (in part) by American interventions in Latin America, but not only American intervention.

 

[darkbeaver]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

You must be blind ITN American Imperialism is the greatest socialist tool ever made, you can't win, you can't even back out gracefully,you're finished. hahahahahahahah

And you find it funny if we go down you're coming along for the ride? That is indeed amusing. Perhaps you should diversify your economy before you hope for such an event, you would be in alot better position to be laughing from afar.

It's called making a sacrifice for the children of tommorow, I would see them not have to listen to corporate imperial bullshit.

 

[Johnny Utah]

This is only an option to use Nuclear bunker busters, as the U.S. Military already has bunker busters that could do the job just as good if it comes to this option in the first place.

 

[I think not]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

It's called making a sacrifice for the children of tommorow, I would see them not have to listen to corporate imperial bullshit.

They will have to listen to corporate imperial bullshit, it might only be in Chinese, but still corporate bullshit nonetheless.

 

[cortezzz]

Re: RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

american atrocities in latin america have created the left there
for example
didnt you yourself say that at one point-- or was it toro
i think it was you and it struck me a little out of character for you

verdad.....

Yes it was me, I only took exception to Castro's little jungle revolutions all over Latin America funded by the Soviets. Other than that, America's paranoia in reference to communism (especially during the 50's and 60's) shed plenty of blood in Latin America - needlessly.

The left was created (in part) by American interventions in Latin America, but not only American intervention.

of course not only by american interventions
as a reaction to very real right wing repression-- domestic
and just plain exploitation
my query was why do you take exception to the latin american case--
could it be that american interventions-- but not only american interventions have significantly contributed to radicalisation of the middle east

for example the USs--unequivacol support of isreal-- to the detriment of the palestinians

or supporting the repressive shah of iran

or supporting the taliban against the soviets

or supporting saddam against iran

or supporting the saud royal family- i mean is saudi-- a democrasy
doesnt look like one

could the mighty US perhaps thru its influence turn saudi into a democrasy--- without firing a bullet--- does it want to,...

of course no one is innocent here
but come on-- nuking iran..
that would freak the world out
even if its towards industrial targets

it would accelerate the proliferation of nukes worldwide

 

[darkbeaver]

RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS IS SEEN BY THE CORPORATE WORLD AS A GOOD THING.

 

[Toro]

RE: Bush Bombs Iran Next

There will not be full-scale war with Iran.

Military strikes, maybe, but I even doubt that.

 

[cortezzz]

well lets hope that your right