I don't much care who is technically right. All I know
is you should never underestimate, and never over-react
and have the wisdom to know when to break those 2 rules.
In addition I don't care which team you cheer, or
which side you are on, this news bodes nothing but
bad for all of us if the Persian Gulf is shut down.
Some of you may jump for joy before the worldwide
depression sets in.
And then all of your care for the little guy was a joke
anyway because of your glee over this.
I don't much care who is technically right. All I know
is you should never underestimate, and never over-react
and have the wisdom to know when to break those 2 rules.
In addition I don't care which team you cheer, or
which side you are on, this news bodes nothing but
bad for all of us if the Persian Gulf is shut down.
Some of you may jump for joy before the worldwide
depression sets in.
And then all of your care for the little guy was a joke
anyway because of your glee over this.
I hope for peaceful resolution I don't want to see anyone killed but what will it take to make the US and UK and Canada see that this stupid grab for oil is disasterous and misguided,when the wrong people are placed in positions of power warfare and death always result, for some this is just good business.
I repeat :
I don't care which team you cheer, or
which side you are on, this news bodes nothing but
bad for all of us if the Persian Gulf is shut down.
Some of you may jump for joy before the worldwide
depression sets in.
And then all of your care for the little guy was a joke
anyway because of your glee over this.
Most world leaders know this better than the average
politically responsible citizen.
Since none of your contributions on this thread were correct I see no reason to give your empty boasting much credit, it's nice to have team spirit but the facts speak for themselves and the sites I looked at had US navy sources, at the time of thier posting the torpedo in question was considered a real threat by your own military and US developement of the same weapon was years behind the Russian design.
American military supremacy has fueled arms development, since air superiority has been the problem to address in modren conflict I would expect that there are in existance very capable air defence systems, 60 years of R & D must have come up with strong anti-aircraft systems by now.
The American navy is littered with so many sensor arrays that I have many suspicions about anything getting through them. Not it that it can't happen, just that it is extremely unlikely.
And what's the range of the torpedo/missile? Is it far enough that they can shoot it from a long ways away? Because anything less than 10km is spittint distance to a modern day well equipped navy.
And lastly. In the Falklands War, the Royal Navy managed to wound the ARA Sante Fe (a submarine) so bably that she was abandoned.
oh oh eaglesmake you speaking as confident from that....as you see BUSH tell you about big army of iraq and iraqi people believe him before you...... but as you see your soldiers come to iraq and they hope know to go out you think you have win....... so the real issue that when you see irans power to be big and big you go dirctly and deride from it but if you think as BUSH you want realy to destroy it just to be sure there are no one can stands on the world as america .... so it easy
# iraq hasnt weighty weapon====>>>>>your soldiers destroy it...if you see
# iran will have nuclear weapon and heavy weapon=====>>> your BUSH hope to erase it from world
and but some other country as.... BUSH say that they must keep them self and they must developed their weapon.... but please know that israel have technology and weapon iran must work for hundred of years to reach them... and and america tell the world she must protect israel from iraq......>>iran......>>which after????
we must wait when america finish from iran and then we can see...

Irans chief weapon is the fact that it does have some suicidal "martyrs", One massive quick Kamikazee swarm of all air assets is Irans best bet at even hurting one carrier. Otherwise they will all be taken out within a few days to no effect anyways.
Right or Wrong, America has a better military than anyone else..push comes to shove it probably has a better military than anyone else. It hasn't cut down on Cold war spending, but everyone else has stopped.

Irans chief weapon is the fact that it does have some suicidal "martyrs", One massive quick Kamikazee swarm of all air assets is Irans best bet at even hurting one carrier. Otherwise they will all be taken out within a few days to no effect anyways.
Right or Wrong, America has a better military than anyone else..push comes to shove it probably has a better military than anyone else. It hasn't cut down on Cold war spending, but everyone else has stopped.

The problem being 50% of Irans population is under 25 and hates the current oppressive regime. Airdrop money and fire-arms, the regime will be overthrown by itself..

The Iraqi army did not fight. The Iranian army would fight. That is the difference. A US invasion of Iran would set of a conflict that would make Iraq look like Grenada. In Iraq some folk are against the US being there. In Iran they all would be up in arms. No conventional army has yet to beat a popular resistance movement with widespread public support.

They have hardware, but very soft software. It's the squishy parts that will fail, any war with Iran will open in the ME but I bet it will spread to the states, then we will see what they're made of, jello.