BushCo crimes - lets do the world a favour


I think not
Avatar
#151
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze

Quote: Originally Posted by I think not

The Iraqis speak to the world everyday, unfortunately all of us listen to our bias because it serves our self-gratifying need to say "I told you so".


speak for yourself...ITN.


How is one to consider an orchestrated interview with an Iraqi on CNN as a valid opionion of the Iraqis??? The media will not interview or play any Iraqi that is discontent with the occupation... sheesh. Speaking of bias......seems media like CNN have that one taped and orchestrated. They present exactly what they think will 'play ' to the US public...........( who have long ago stopped thinking for themselves.. ) That is a generality. There are many USers who still do use their cerebral matter and reason things beyond what they have been spoon fed.

If the fringe left posters on this board are indicative of unbias opinion, I'll stick to being "brainwashed" by CNN. And btw OB, a nice chunk of the Canadian population supported Bush in Iraq, which channels do they watch and get dumbed down?
 
Curiosity
Avatar
#152
Quote: Originally Posted by bluealberta

My points were simply to show that there is another side to this story, and I also agree that none of us knows the whole story, only the CNN version or Fox version, which are usually different.

The point about a better life is that women are now more than just posessions, able to actually show their faces in public without fear of death, and the citizens of Iraq have the right to vote, something we take very casually, something they appear to take very seriously, as evidenced by voting amid bombings BY THEIR OWN PEOPLE.

Do you not ever wonder who funds these terrorists who are blowing up cars, themselves, innocent kids and moms and dads? Maybe if more time was spent tracking down the source of their funds (Syria?) and putting an end to that, the real triumph of democracy in Iraq could be seen all the time.

As for Albertans, you show your ignorance, there are numerous Albertans in Iraq, oil and otherwise involved.

bluealberta

I have found many credible (and later proven) incidents reported by the military blog network. I have learned to trust a couple of them, especially when they go off line for a couple of weeks and then return to post with permission from their superiors what they have accomplished.

Nobody is editing their blogs either. It is fascinating stuff. I would rather leave the politics out of it - no doubt the Pentagon isn't sharing everything anyway - they never do - especially with politicians! (Unless they want funding of course).
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
Avatar
#153
Quote:

Maybe if more time was spent tracking down the source of their funds (Syria?) and putting an end to that, the real triumph of democracy in Iraq could be seen all the time.

So, why don't they expend the energy in tracking the money trail to get better control of those that fund, perpetuate and foster terrorists???

So why hasn't the bush cabal located and captured OBL yet. OBL has a money trail......too. (maybe a different currency ).

oh that's right.........OBL ..Who???

Glamorizing the new Iraq as it is now is not painting the truthful picture. Cultural values take a long time to change. Learning to live in a democracy will take a long time too. and that is when they define what democracy means to them and how it translates into their every day lives.

One has no idea just how much "freedom" the women have in Iraq which is still a male dominated society. don't know how anyone can equate voting with a democratic society when so much of the gov't is under such intense security. As long as they live under the threat of US bombs, or terrorist bombs.......they do not live in a democracy. Most of the election propaganda has been for show anyhow. Something to be televised and used politically by the bush cabal. Most Iraqis feel the election was rigged.

so where is the truth in all this??
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
Avatar
#154
Quote: Originally Posted by I think not

Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean BreezeQuote: Originally Posted by I think notThe Iraqis speak to the world everyday, unfortunately all of us listen to our bias because it serves our self-gratifying need to say "I told you so".
speak for yourself...ITN.
How is one to consider an orchestrated interview with an Iraqi on CNN as a valid opionion of the Iraqis??? The media will not interview or play any Iraqi that is discontent with the occupation... sheesh. Speaking of bias......seems media like CNN have that one taped and orchestrated. They present exactly what they think will 'play ' to the US public...........( who have long ago stopped thinking for themselves.. ) That is a generality. There are many USers who still do use their cerebral matter and reason things beyond what they have been spoon fed.If the fringe left posters on this board are indicative of unbias opinion, I'll stick to being "brainwashed" by CNN. And btw OB, a nice chunk of the Canadian population supported Bush in Iraq, which channels do they watch and get dumbed down?

Quote has been trimmed

a no brainer: they watch CNN.

What is with the branding of people into groups??? the fringe left, the left, the right , right wing fanatical SOB and on it goes. Sheesh. Putting people into little pigeon holes is exactly what an autocratic society does.......when it stops thinking and being creative. So much easier that way than to address people on an individual level. So much easier to feed one's own prejudice. No branding, no prejudice........and the US just has to have something to be prejudiced about.

Pathetic..

but each to his own...... as long as one understands there are no winners in crap like that.
 
I think not
Avatar
#155
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze

One has no idea just how much "freedom" the women have in Iraq which is still a male dominated society. don't know how anyone can equate voting with a democratic society when so much of the gov't is under such intense security. As long as they live under the threat of US bombs, or terrorist bombs.......they do not live in a democracy. Most of the election propaganda has been for show anyhow. Something to be televised and used politically by the bush cabal. Most Iraqis feel the election was rigged.

so where is the truth in all this??

Oddly enough the UN has given its blessing with the Iraq elections, did you miss that post?
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
Avatar
#156
Quote: Originally Posted by I think not

Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze

One has no idea just how much "freedom" the women have in Iraq which is still a male dominated society. don't know how anyone can equate voting with a democratic society when so much of the gov't is under such intense security. As long as they live under the threat of US bombs, or terrorist bombs.......they do not live in a democracy. Most of the election propaganda has been for show anyhow. Something to be televised and used politically by the bush cabal. Most Iraqis feel the election was rigged.

so where is the truth in all this??

Oddly enough the UN has given its blessing with the Iraq elections, did you miss that post?

surprised that the name of the UN Is even invoked here as didn't the USR claim LOUD and FIERCE that the UN is irrelevant.??? So null and void on that on. or is the UN ok.......as long as it does what the US approves of or blindly supports the US??? Doesn't seem all that fair now......does it.?? But then who said politics were "fair"???
 
I think not
Avatar
#157
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze

a no brainer: they watch CNN.

What is with the branding of people into groups??? the fringe left, the left, the right , right wing fanatical SOB and on it goes. Sheesh. Putting people into little pigeon holes is exactly what an autocratic society does.......when it stops thinking and being creative. So much easier that way than to address people on an individual level. So much easier to feed one's own prejudice. No branding, no prejudice........and the US just has to have something to be prejudiced about.

Pathetic..

but each to his own...... as long as one understands there are no winners in crap like that.

You mean as opposed to when others call everybody just to the right of Karl Marx philosophies a neo-con?
 
I think not
#158
Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze

surprised that the name of the UN Is even invoked here as didn't the UN claim LOUD and FIERCE that the UN is irrelevant.??? So null and void on that on. or is the UN ok.......as long as it does what the US approves of or blindly supports the US??? Doesn't seem all that fair now......does it.?? But then who said politics were "fair"???

How does this rant dismiss the UN's statement? It doesn't.
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
Avatar
#159
Quote: Originally Posted by I think not

Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze

surprised that the name of the UN Is even invoked here as didn't the UN claim LOUD and FIERCE that the UN is irrelevant.??? So null and void on that on. or is the UN ok.......as long as it does what the US approves of or blindly supports the US??? Doesn't seem all that fair now......does it.?? But then who said politics were "fair"???

How does this rant dismiss the UN's statement? It doesn't.

 
bluealberta
#160
Quote: Originally Posted by I think not

Quote: Originally Posted by Ocean Breeze

surprised that the name of the UN Is even invoked here as didn't the UN claim LOUD and FIERCE that the UN is irrelevant.??? So null and void on that on. or is the UN ok.......as long as it does what the US approves of or blindly supports the US??? Doesn't seem all that fair now......does it.?? But then who said politics were "fair"???

How does this rant dismiss the UN's statement? It doesn't.

To put it back to you, OB, when the UN says something you don't like, is it then irrelvant to YOU?

At the end of the day, I for one, believe that Iraq is much better off now than it was with Saddam. You remember Saddam right? You know, they guy who killed babies if he or his henchmen saw a mom or dad even acknowlege the US troops when they first arrived? May be a simple statement, but sometimes the simpler, the better.

From what I hear, the Afghanis were pretty damn happy to have the US and allied troops in their country when the earthquake hit.
 
jimmoyer
Avatar
#161
Well, first, Ocean Breeze, I thank you for still
hanging in there and I hope others who do agree with
you do not depart out of disgust from those of us
who disagree.

I hope Moghrabi, Karlin, Hard Luck Henry and others
do not leave out of disgust with more conservative
view points.

Ocean Breeze, thanks again for having a hardy spirit.

And now that issue of labels on groups of people.

Yeah, Ocean Breeze, you're right that labels often
are somewhat unjust and inaccurate and cause intolerance.

On the other hand, we all know where most of us
sit in the spectrum, and so if we could use the label
as a practical shorthand so to speak, it would save us
the trouble of a paragraph or two.

And all words are labels.
If we start ommitting some labels, we're missing
the practicality of it all, making it more cumbersome
and more wordy than the convenience of one word.

Yet, again, Ocean Breeze' admonition about the
labels encouraging intolerance is still worthwhile, but not to the point where
it loses practicality in that all words are labels
and that all our posts becomes a politically correct
tiresome excercise.

Hmmm....perhaps it is.
 
Ocean Breeze
Free Thinker
Avatar
#162
Quote:

To put it back to you, OB, when the UN says something you don't like, is it then irrelvant to YOU?

nice try , but no cigar.


(an aside.........but this used to be a nicely balanced board /forum........and suddenly it has become something else entirely. ........and not a pleasant place to be. Seems the same people who favor discussing/attacking the posters as opposed to the topics are back in full form and doing just that... which implies a serious learning disability. )

but there is a time for everything and sometimes the time has come....

very sad.....and one has to be a masochist to hang around such pathology..

Happy new year everyone....... and time for a major hiatus at this end.

ta ta and have fun.
 
jimmoyer
Avatar
#163
Hey Ocean Breeze, I felt the same way, but hope
you stay and I wish for all of us just to be a little
more tolerant.
 
Curiosity
Avatar
#164
Ocean Breeze

Looks as if you were trying to find a reason for exit - which is sad considering you have built up such a case for argument.

I understand you are in a terrible place right now as your long time forum has been split and you have lost people you care about here.
But why not stay and continue the good work which was going on before?

Why not hang in there when you calm down and try to dissect some of the arguable points and let's come to an understanding.

I walked into the middle of something which seemed terribly passionate to you..... don't leave it unresolved.

Or do you wish it to be?

You seem much more knowledgable than that.

I would like to be convinced that what you write is credible evidence, not just your personal impassioned opinion. This is a war, peoples' lives are being torn apart, and arguing impotently without back up and rationale debate, we are doing little to help the people understand....

Hell I'm still trying to figure out what USR is of which you write...
 
FiveParadox
Liberal
Avatar
#165
On the Subject of the United Nations

In my opinion, if the United Nations were to be reformed so as to prevent one nation (such as a permanent member of the Security Council) from exercising a veto on any motion or measure with which it may happen to disagree. This renders the assembly ineffective, and somewhat less legitimate.

At the very least, a veto should only be invoked if a majority of members of the Security Council consent to the exercise, rather than one single nation holding such sweeping power. Furthermore, the activities of the United Nations should be made more publicized by the mainstream media; if citizens knew of some of the studies and ideas coming out of the UN, perhaps people would appreciate the body more than the mainstream currently seems to.

On the Subject of Iraq

Perhaps the Speaker of the House of Commons of Canada should invite the Speaker of the corresponding Parliamentary institution in Iraq to attend one of the next session's sittings of the Canadian Commons. If Iraq is indeed becoming sovereign, then Canada should embrace the Parliament of Iraq; in fact, I would be in favour of establishing Interparliamentary Committees between Canada and Iraq to discuss matters of international concern.
 
jimmoyer
Avatar
#166
Very good post, Wednesday's child !!

I'd like to advise the conservatives that we are
guests in a house "THEY" created and it would be
ashame to see all of the original membership feel
they have to leave their own house.

And telling them to have more toughness is no way
to go about it.

We guests should be more civil without
losing resilience in our points of view.

This place is not about singing to the choir.

It's about having a two-way conversation.

It's about us agreeing that NO ONE has a monopoly
on one truth.
 
Curiosity
Avatar
#167
On the Iraq Elections

Parts I through IV

--
 
doug
#168
<Snip> Stick with the topic, avoid personal attacks. Your comments have been posted in the moderator thread. Smarten up. Cosmo


As you well know my deleted response was in reference to this. Are you suggesting my response was erroneous? Do you always delete/edit posts you personally find offensive regardless of thier provenance?

Quote:

(an aside.........but this used to be a nicely balanced board /forum........and suddenly it has become something else entirely. ........and not a pleasant place to be. Seems the same people who favor discussing/attacking the posters as opposed to the topics are back in full form and doing just that... which implies a serious learning disability. )

but there is a time for everything and sometimes the time has come....

very sad.....and one has to be a masochist to hang around such pathology..

Happy new year everyone....... and time for a major hiatus at this end.

ta ta and have fun.

 
Curiosity
Avatar
#169
Quote: Originally Posted by jimmoyer

Very good post, Wednesday's child !!

I'd like to advise the conservatives that we are
guests in a house "THEY" created and it would be
ashame to see all of the original membership feel
they have to leave their own house.

And telling them to have more toughness is no way
to go about it.

We guests should be more civil without
losing resilience in our points of view.

This place is not about singing to the choir.

It's about having a two-way conversation.

It's about us agreeing that NO ONE has a monopoly
on one truth.

JimMoyer

Thank you - I am not certain about "conservative house and guests" because these again are labels. I see in a re-read now that you mean this forum was a liberal one and as conservatives, these writers are "guests". I think I have it now. Sorry!

There is not one person here who would run to the aid of another and look for a label describing the political party to which the injured belonged before taking action in getting help.

Forums are places to find a resolution or meeting of the ways which clear to understanding. It is not to lay blame on others or to "win" because in war there is no "win". This isn't much of a sport because in the long run we are all affected no matter the outcome of any war. Politics are for the empty rhetoric when the guns stop firing and history will be written and re-written to suit.

Meanwhile people like you and I have an opportunity to avail ourselves of both sides of the argument, sort out our own feelings and try to make sense from what is handed down - which the military ultimately pays for in sacrifice.

If there are gross errors made by George Bush, the Republican Party, the Pentagon, and all the others being labeled here, history will soon tell us their sad story and it will be well known for all of us to learn from.

Meanwhile, we waiting to see the outcome of the drama being played out on the world stage, can argue impotently one side or the other and form teams to outwit the others, or we can wipe out the lines of demarcation and the labels and realize we are all in this together like it or not... and better we discuss it now so we don't go down this path again any time soon.

The people in Iraq are not stupid, nor are they idiots, and I hope they are taking every advantage of the things offered to them by the blood of their own people and the blood of the young from other lands.... and make something of their new lives....women included.

If you will think back on how Japan is now....how Germany is now....how Britain is now.....how Russia and its satellite nations are now.... how South Korea is now.... how North Korea is now.... how Vietnam is now.....some things have been accomplished - poorly perhaps - violently certainly - but progress has been made.

Sadly we are still living in the messy thoughts of what Queen Victoria's children bequeathed us...what a dysfunctional family that must have been!
 
Cosmo
Avatar
#170
Albertablue ... ITN ... The two of you are here on a trial basis after being banned. If you choose to attack a valuable, established member of this forum, you will be given another invitation to move along. Particulary when it is a tag team effort.

There have been some changes here ... some folks have left, others have arrived, but there is still no room for bull****. This did not become a free-for-all overnight. If you can't be civil in the political threads, I suggest you scoot on over to the joke thread and lighten up.

Ocean ... I hope you will reconsider. Your input is highly valued here.

Cosmo
 
Jo Canadian
#171
 
Jo Canadian
#172
 

Similar Threads

32
Lets see what the Leftys would do........
by EastSideScotian | Jun 21st, 2006
139
lets cut and run
by cortez | Mar 22nd, 2006
6
BushCo. Humor
by Ocean Breeze | Nov 28th, 2005
no new posts