Cleveland Ohio RTA Bus Driver Uppercuts Female Passenger


In Between Man
+3
#1

Cleveland Ohio RTA Bus Driver Uppercuts Female Passenger - YouTube

 
Most helpful post: The members here have rated this post as best reply.
karrie
+10
#2  Top Rated Post
Title should read... passenger hits bus driver, bus driver hits back. Gender's moot in this. Being a woman doesn't give you cart blanche to run around hitting men and expect them to sit and take it.

I do have to say though... that chick is tough as nails to get back up after that. Wowzas.
 
captain morgan
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by karrieView Post

I do have to say though... that chick is tough as nails to get back up after that. Wowzas.

I can't believe that she was able to stand after that shot... Tyson or Holyfield would have been in palokaville had they taken that - but this lady still had the wherewithall to go on the attack.
 
#juan
+1
#4
All that anger, and a voice that shatters glass. Amazing she hasn't been maced or shot before now.
The person that should be protected here, is the bus driver.
 
captain morgan
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by #juanView Post

All that anger, and a voice that shatters glass. Amazing she hasn't been maced or shot before now.
The person that should be protected here, is the bus driver.

Maybe she's had run-ins before... Might explain how she wasn't unconscious after that shot.... I still really can't believe it
 
SLM
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by karrieView Post

Title should read... passenger hits bus driver, bus driver hits back. Gender's moot in this. Being a woman doesn't give you cart blanche to run around hitting men and expect them to sit and take it.

I do have to say though... that chick is tough as nails to get back up after that. Wowzas.

LOL.

Lesson learned: Do NOT piss a bitch off.
 
gerryh
+1
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by karrieView Post

Title should read... passenger hits bus driver, bus driver hits back. Gender's moot in this. Being a woman doesn't give you cart blanche to run around hitting men and expect them to sit and take it.

I do have to say though... that chick is tough as nails to get back up after that. Wowzas.


Nope, nope, nope, and again nope.

I don't care what a woman does to a man, he doesn't hit her. Restrain is fine, hit, never. Period. End of discussion.

I know you and my wife disagree with me on this, but...................

I've told my boys, that if I ever catch them hitting a woman that they should be prepared for castration. The same with the word "no". I don't care if she's lying on their bed, naked with their legs spread wide. If they say no, it's no. Period.
 
karrie
+3
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

Nope, nope, nope, and again nope.

I don't care what a woman does to a man, he doesn't hit her. Restrain is fine, hit, never. Period. End of discussion.

I know you and my wife disagree with me on this, but...................

I've told my boys, that if I ever catch them hitting a woman that they should be prepared for castration. The same with the word "no". I don't care if she's lying on their bed, naked with their legs spread wide. If they say no, it's no. Period.

I'm too humanist to care what gender is doing the hitting.... No one should be hitting anyone, and if you start something, you should expect your opponent to fight back.
 
gerryh
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by karrieView Post

I'm too humanist to care what gender is doing the hitting.... No one should be hitting anyone, and if you start something, you should expect your opponent to fight back.


Nope, the line can get blurred then. Some men could then find any excuse as to why "she" deserved it and that he was "only defending" himself. I'm not willing to give ANY lowlife that opportunity. They use it enough as is.
 
gore0bsessed
+1
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by karrieView Post

Title should read... passenger hits bus driver, bus driver hits back. Gender's moot in this. Being a woman doesn't give you cart blanche to run around hitting men and expect them to sit and take it.

lol, the uppercut wasn't justified in the remotest.
 
bill barilko
+1
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

I don't care what a woman does to a man, he doesn't hit her. Restrain is fine, hit, never. Period. End of discussion.

Quite agree-it's called Being Responsible.
 
karrie
#12
Quote: Originally Posted by gore0bsessedView Post

lol, the uppercut wasn't justified in the remotest.

Perhaps not... but not because she was a woman.
 
Angstrom
+2
#13
It reminds me of that McDonnald video where a woman thought she could cut in line, a male told her to get in back, she flips out on him, and he just pulverizes her and leaves. One shot out cold deal.

This girl got back up in this video lol.


Way I see it. if women want to be equals, they should not expect the special treatment they use to have.
 
karrie
+1
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by AngstromView Post

It reminds me of that McDonnald video where a woman though she could cut in line, a male told her to get in back, she flips out on him, and he just pulverizes her and leaves. One shot out cold deal.

This girl got back up in this video lol.


Way I see it. if women want to be equals, they should not be expecting the special treatment they use to have.

Yeah, the good old days when women never got hit...lol.

In my opinion, violence is never the answer, and escalating it should be avoided. If you shouldn't hit someone, you shouldn't hit someone, regardless of what genitalia they're packing.
 
Goober
#15
Question- Could the driver have deescalated the situation.
 
TenPenny
+1
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

I don't care what a woman does to a man, he doesn't hit her. Restrain is fine, hit, never. Period. End of discussion.

You should never hit anyone. Your different rules for men vs women is outdated.

Never hit first is the cardinal rule, no matter the gender of the opponent.
 
Kreskin
#17
She sounds like Sarah Palin.
 
taxslave
+2
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

She sounds like Sarah Palin.

Only more intelligent.
 
Cannuck
#19
Misogyny veiled as chivalry. Either women are equal or they aren't. Clearly Gerry feels having a ****** somehow makes one a lesser human being.
 
gerryh
+1 / -1
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

You should never hit anyone. Your different rules for men vs women is outdated.

Never hit first is the cardinal rule, no matter the gender of the opponent.

Agreed. Never hit first, added, never hit a woman for any reason.

Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

Misogyny veiled as chivalry. Either women are equal or they aren't. Clearly Gerry feels having a ****** somehow makes one a lesser human being.


Nope, women aren't equal. Unlike you, who appears to want to protect some inherent right that you seem you have to beat on women when you feel it is fit, I feel women are superior to men. That should be held up onto a pedestal. They are to be protected, when necessary. Women are mankinds life blood. Without women the human race would die very quickly. They are our Mothers. So, if you feel it's all right to beat on your mother, then you are one poor excuse for a man.
 
Johnnny
#21
While i myself would never hit a women for any reason, i wouldnt really for bad for a women who goes out of her way to pick a fight.....The bus driver was clearly tougher than the lady, and he should have just told her to leave and if she didnt than the authorities should have been brought in to be involved. Now if a female bus driver had beaten the **** out of that lady i also wouldnt have had a problem with it, and would have viewed it the same as a man on man fight.... For the most part us men are physically stronger than most women so naturally its going to be an unbalanced fight.
 
Cannuck
+3
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

Nope, women aren't equal. Unlike you, who appears to want to protect some inherent right that you seem you have to beat on women when you feel it is fit, I feel women are superior to men. That should be held up onto a pedestal. They are to be protected, when necessary. Women are mankinds life blood. Without women the human race would die very quickly. They are our Mothers. So, if you feel it's all right to beat on your mother, then you are one poor excuse for a man.

What a load of nonsense.

The only reason women and only women would need "protection" from men is that you feel they are inherently inferior and unable to protect themselves as well as men. You aren't fooling anybody.

Quote: Originally Posted by JohnnnyView Post

While i myself would never hit a women for any reason...

I wouldn't hit anybody for any reason with the exception that I was in danger. Gerry feels women are incapable of placing a man in danger because they are weak.
 
gerryh
+1
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

What a load of nonsense.

Yup, I can see how you would think that way.
 
Cannuck
+1
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

Yup, I can see how you would think that way.

I'm sure you can. It certainly makes sense.
 
bill barilko
#25
Quote: Originally Posted by KreskinView Post

She sounds like Sarah Palin.

even so.....

Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Question- Could the driver have deescalated the situation.

Yes but he lacked the training and the education to realise he could.
 
gore0bsessed
+1
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by CannuckView Post

Misogyny veiled as chivalry. Either women are equal or they aren't. Clearly Gerry feels having a ****** somehow makes one a lesser human being.

Equal rights somehow means women can take equal punishment from what a man could take? Does not correlate.
 
Cannuck
#27
Quote: Originally Posted by gore0bsessedView Post

Equal rights somehow means women can take equal punishment from what a man could take? Does not correlate.

It has nothing to do with how much punishment one can take. Gerry believes Claire is in need of male protection simply because of her genitalia. He is completely wrong of course.

BBQ Beatdown 6 - Claire Haights beats male opponent - MMA in Thailand - YouTube

 
B00Mer
#28
This Cleveland RTA driver looked to be 220+ pounds, and he hits this lady in the face like she was a man. All he had to do was remove her off the bus, he didn't have to continue to fight her. This is way out of control anger, and not self defense as the women only hit him once and didn't continue to attack, and she should be charged.

He is the supposed to be the professional here and he antagonizes her by saying she was ugly and her face was all cut up.

Also, the bus company should also be responsible for the drivers safety here, the girl was able to assault him.. why??

They do have bus driver cages.. not a very good Union. In a post 9/11 setting I am surprised that more bus companies do not protect their drivers better.



Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

Agreed. Never hit first, added, never hit a woman for any reason.


...and later this evening gerryh is out at the bar and this women (below) gives gerryh a beat down and he goes into a fetal position like a sissy to protect his pretty face,, lol

 
Praxius
+1
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

Nope, nope, nope, and again nope.

I don't care what a woman does to a man, he doesn't hit her. Restrain is fine, hit, never. Period. End of discussion.

So you'd just sit there and get the sh*t kicked out of you, possibly being sent to the hospital due to your injuries?

You'd still do nothing if they pulled a knife or gun to possibly kill you?

If they decided to attack a family member you know wouldn't be able to defend themselves, you'd just sit by and do nothing? Or you'd try and restrain them from harming you or others.... I wonder how long that chivalry mentality will last after they knock a tooth or two out of your head, drive a thumbnail into your eye or drive a knee or two into your nuts.

Sorry, but this isn't anywhere near end of discussion, I don't care if you're male or female, if you decide to attack, you're going down.

I never start a fight, and will use words to get my point across, but once physical violence is added into the situation, all bets are off and I will defend myself.

This isn't the 50's anymore, when most women don't know how to defend themselves or attack.... Most know how to throw a good punch and can cause some serious injury, knowing where to hit.

Fk that old BS of not hitting a girl.... If they attack you, just like a male / any other human, you don't know what they are capable of, you don't know how far they will go and so you need to defend yourself.

I have seen far too many women use this mentality to their advantage and did some damage to guys who just sat there and took it.... Who ended up with permanent scars and other injuries.

Sorry, as they say, equal rights, equal fights.... That bus driver did what he should have. She mouthed off, she escalated the situation and threw the first punch.... And he fuk'd her up for her efforts.

I seen a regular group of teenage b*tches on the bus back in Halifax that were a lot like this mouthy a-hole.

Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

Nope, the line can get blurred then. Some men could then find any excuse as to why "she" deserved it and that he was "only defending" himself. I'm not willing to give ANY lowlife that opportunity. They use it enough as is.

BS on that... I have never once used any excuse nor have I had to fight or be hit by a female, but if I had to, I would.

The only excuse is when you are attacked. If you start the violence, there is no excuse.... But if the violence was brought onto you first, it's time to drive a fist into their fk'n mouth and into the back of their throat.

Don't want to be hit or have the crap beaten out of you? Don't start it by raising your fists and swinging first.

You say some men will find any excuse, well there's no excuse for violence except when you are defending yourself from violence.

If everybody, men and women, adhered to that belief, there wouldn't be any violence to worry about.

And sorry, but self defence is not an excuse... It's a right.
 
CDNBear
+3
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by gerryhView Post

Restrain is fine, hit, never.

It's always amazed me how poor some members comprehension skills are.

The morally bankrupt can't fathom chivalry, let alone understand how someone may actually be chivalrous.
 
no new posts