Tory MP's call to revisit rights-of-unborn law fuels abortion debate

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Tory MP's call to revisit rights-of-unborn law fuels abortion debate

An Ontario Conservative MP says it is time for Parliament to take another look at whether basic human rights should be granted to unborn babies – a move that would put the emotionally charged issue of abortion back on the public agenda.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said repeatedly that his government will not reopen the abortion debate.

But Stephen Woodworth, the MP for Kitchener-Centre, says there is no reason that Canadians can’t have a rational conversation about the matter. “I am just hoping to launch a discussion and let people know what the situation is,” he said in telephone interview.

In a news release issued Wednesday that does not mention abortion directly, Mr. Woodworth points out that the Canadian statute that defines a human being as someone who is completely separate from the mother’s body has its roots in British legal treatises written in the 17th century.

The important question, he said, is whether a 400-year-old law is supported by 21st-century medical science and principles of human rights.

“Whatever view one has on abortion, it would be important to know whether a child is a human being,” he told The Globe and Mail. “And I think it is really ridiculous, in a way, that we have a 400-year-old definition of a human being that has important human-rights implications.”

Mr. Woodworth said, for now, he will see where the public discussion goes and “it may be that in the new year I will take it to another step.”

He did not say what that next step might be. But reports that trickled out of the federal Conservative caucus after the party won a majority government last spring suggested that Mr. Harper had warned his MPs he did not want backbench moves to reopen the abortion issue.

Mr. Harper tried during the election campaign to put to rest the notion that a Conservative government would introduce laws to reduce access to abortions.

“As long as I am Prime Minister, we are not opening the abortion debate,” Mr. Harper declared. “The government will not bring forward any such legislation, and any such legislation that is brought forward will be defeated as long as I am Prime Minister.”

When asked if Mr. Harper knew of Mr. Woodworth’s call for a discussion about the rights of unborn children, a spokeswoman in the Prime Minister’s Office: “We have always been clear, our government has no intention to reopen this debate.”

Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett said Mr. Harper “is the most controlling prime minister we have ever known” and there is no way that a backbench MP like Mr. Woodworth could issue a press release without his knowledge.

“The Prime Minister promised this wouldn’t be reopened during the election, and here it is again,” Ms. Bennett said.

Françoise Boivin, the NDP critic for the status of women, said Mr. Woodworth is a very smart person who has crafted his message in a way that does not appear to address abortion directly. Instead, she said, he asks what seems to be a “benign” question about an outdated law.

“I think it is a bit devious,” Ms. Boivin said. “My question to him would be, ‘Okay, now, why do you want to do that?’”

In 2010, Mr. Harper voted against a private-member’s bill introduced by Conservative MP Rod Bruinooge that would have added new Criminal Code penalties for those who coerce women to have an abortion.

But many Conservative MPs remain strongly opposed to abortion and some, including Maurice Vellacott, Brad Trost and Leon Benoit, have been quite public in their opposition, apparently without sanction from the Prime Minister.

Canada has no legal restrictions on abortion.

The Conservative government of Brian Mulroney tried in 1990 to pass a law that would severely limit access to abortions. It made it through the House of Commons, but was defeated in the Senate in 1991. Since that time, abortion has been treated like all other medical procedures.

Tory MP's call to revisit rights-of-unborn law fuels abortion debate - The Globe and Mail
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Fear not he is simply (pun intended) telling his supporters what they want to hear so they will donate more to his pension campaign. Happens every few months.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Wow, between this and Harper telling the americans what for with the oil pipeline. I may have to rethink my Liberal support.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Fear not he is simply (pun intended) telling his supporters what they want to hear so they will donate more to his pension campaign. Happens every few months.
Exactly. Support must be waning in a few religious neighbourhoods.
 

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
9
Aether Island
Oh goodie!

What kind of rights do these things get?

Human or Animal?

BBC NEWS | Health | Plan to create human-cow embryos

As I saw as reported on Shatner's "Weird or What?!", a monkey-human hybrid went ape in India's capital terrorizing the entire city. Even though the chimera remains at large, if captured, would he get a fair trial as a jury of his peers would be nigh impossible to assemble?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
"You may begin to undermine the whole distinction between humans animals and humans"


Calum MacKellar

Can anybody explain what is the difference between an animal and a human? Is it our self perceived intellect or our bloated egos?


 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
I would like to see Canada's extremist position on abortion "rights" moderated in law........

But that simply is not going to happen.

So you can all relax.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
"You may begin to undermine the whole distinction between humans animals and humans"


Calum MacKellar

Can anybody explain what is the difference between an animal and a human? Is it our self perceived intellect or our bloated egos?



Well we have a tendency to eat more of them than they of us. One difference.
And if you value a chickens life over a persons well I will leave it at that.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
Because he is into religion, because he is into control.......my word, simply look at the route HE has chosen for Canada, against how Canadians want this country to go. It does not want to be a clone of the US.

I LOVE you guys!!! :) SOOO self-deluded it is hilarious!

First of all, Harper wants a debate on abortion about as much as he wants a case of shingles and scabies simultaneously.

Secondly, he was ELECTED.

Thirdly, 62% of Canadians think Canada is going in the RIGHT direction.

Fourth, we are not, and will never be a clone of the USA.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
I LOVE you guys!!! :) SOOO self-deluded it is hilarious!

First of all, Harper wants a debate on abortion about as much as he wants a case of shingles and scabies simultaneously.

Secondly, he was ELECTED.

Thirdly, 62% of Canadians think Canada is going in the RIGHT direction.

Fourth, we are not, and will never be a clone of the USA.

The extreme left does not like it that Canada is right at the top of the list of Countries in good financial shape.
 

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
44
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
Because he is into religion, because he is into control.......my word, simply look at the route HE has chosen for Canada, against how Canadians want this country to go. It does not want to be a clone of the US.

Oh my gosh he's "into religion"!!!? But, how can he do that? Everyone's told me that people who are "into religion" should stay out of politics. Did Harper know when he ran for public office that it was expected of him to compartmentalize his beliefs?!
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Because he is into religion, because he is into control.......my word, simply look at the route HE has chosen for Canada, against how Canadians want this country to go. It does not want to be a clone of the US.

I see a dedicated Liberal runs thru.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
"You may begin to undermine the whole distinction between humans animals and humans"


Calum MacKellar

Can anybody explain what is the difference between an animal and a human? Is it our self perceived intellect or our bloated egos?





You're not going to like my answer, but here it is any ways. God put animals on earth for mankinds stewardship and use.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
You're not going to like my answer, but here it is any ways. God put animals on earth for mankinds stewardship and use.
Stewardship is right. Dominion is a deliberate mistranslation. None the less, humans are animal and I view other animals as my kin.