That's why the Dems, not Trump, are trying to change the rules of the elections?
There's three choices for this election.
Go out and vote in person, possibly exposing yourself and your family to Covid.
Vote by absentee ballots.
Don't vote.
So preferably, choice one or choice two is all there is as options, because choice three shouldn't be.
But choice one isn't exactly safe, especially if say in a person's family there IS an immuno compromised person. So choice two is all they have.
If it were just one or two or a few 'choice two' answers, I doubt there'd be issues, but we're talking MILLIONS of people choosing two as their only way to vote this year.
Even if they vote early, counting could take days if done by hand.
What YOU are advocating, TM, is that those people's votes don't matter. What people are trying to do via the court is say that "your vote DOES matter, though we may not get to counting it on the night of the election due to so many voting by absentee. We need time. The only way to get that time is via the courts."
The current system of voting in the US is not able to handle MILLIONS of people voting by absentee ballts/mail in ballots. They're not asking to vote AFTER election day, they're asking to be allowed to keep COUNTING past election night so everyone's vote is counted.
So my question to you is why are you against people's votes mattering/being counted?