Alberta to release climate change policy at Edmonton science centre
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
banned? It's simply a matter of encouraging meaningful discourse... something that stems from the top-down, from moderator action. If you will indulge a simple question: why do "you" (the royal CC moderator you) continue to allow the most purposeful thread disruption/derailing with the most inane and unrelated shyte throwing comments that continue to populate most of these CC threads... comments that come from the same ole crew here?
hey SLM... see drywall/drywaldo for case in point!
from the CC Forum Rules: "This site is intended to be a medium for public discussion. You are free to express your views forcefully but we require you to remain civil. Insults, hate speech, and deliberately inflammatory statements, commonly known as trolling, are not acceptable. Do not threaten anyone or any group or suggest they are deserving of harm."
from the CC Forum Rules: "This site is intended to be a medium for public discussion. You are free to express your views forcefully but we require you to remain civil. Insults, hate speech, and deliberately inflammatory statements, commonly known as trolling, are not acceptable. Do not threaten anyone or any group or suggest they are deserving of harm."
Since day one, you've done everything in your power to have anything but.
If she were step that up, you wouldn't be here.
You do NOTHING to encourage meaningful discourse of any kind. You haven't since the moment you arrived here. You were nose in the air, ignorant to people who gave your posts serious replies long before you ever caught the freaking attention of Bear or Captn Morgan or Petros. This is when people got fed up with you.
And you still do nothing to encourage it. You come on here, again, talking about nothing but how horrific the forum is and there is no discussion. Fine, then there is no reason for you to be here. Get out.
Because we both know that unless you back off, this is only going to end one way.
and you would? Your posts are nothing but purposeful insults, disruption, derailing... well, other than the ones where you and your clubhouse bro's shuck & jive and high-five each other!
I've had significant meaningful discussion with many members here... I do note most of them have given up and moved on! Wonder why. As for any of this clubhouse crew giving me any serious reply, that has never happened. This board is nothing but an echo-chamber that is ruled by the usual suspects... and they likee their own echo!
I just posted a most meaningful extract from the CC Forum Rules... let me do it again, and if you'll indulge, perhaps suggest why CC moderators choose to ignore it? Again: "This site is intended to be a medium for public discussion. You are free to express your views forcefully but we require you to remain civil. Insults, hate speech, and deliberately inflammatory statements, commonly known as trolling, are not acceptable."
I seem to get a pass, so long as I cannibalize trolls.
YOU, and Fluffer, should think about that for a minute.
.. And you wonder why you are received in the fashion you are.
Got anymore failed models to lean on as proof-positive?.. I know, you ought to substantiate these failed models with a bunch of unrealized predictions, that'll fix all of us that don't march lock step with you
I'm reporting you to PETA
Let's really hope that he follows through this time
If coal plants emit CO2 then they are taxed on that. A tree or any other plant eats CO2 as their 'air' and they emit O2, a gas that is helpful to people. That would suggest an office building that has the walls covered in vines produces a measurable amount of O2 and a certain amount of CO2 would get a reduction in it's overall carbon foot-print. Producing an anti-greenhouse gas. On a larger scale Canada's swamp spruce are small in size but many in number are capable of altering the air composition but nobody lives there to take advantage of it.
What should be done is a study that concludes that being exposed to air that is 23% O2 rather than 20% or lower has detrimental health effects. Cars would be required to produce a certain amount of ozone to balance out the CO2 emissions. Ozone breaks down in about 20 minutes to 'harmless gasses'. A high voltage spark is all it takes to produce ozone so each plug wire could have a number of breaks in it that would have 5 blue sparks before the power was applied to the spark plug.
Total output of gas is CO2 + O3 = <CO2 overall
You don't seem to like this place much.....
one tiny little question?
Do you always shop at stores you don't like or eat at restaurants where you hate the food?
Won't have time... Notley timed her freak-show to be (coincidentally) 1 hour before the CFL West final between Calgary and Edmonton.
No surprise that her policy will be tax increases