Senior Cleric Attacks Women

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,666
7,116
113
Washington DC
Former highest-ranking U.S. cardinal blames ‘feminization’ for the Catholic Church’s problems

By Terrence McCoy January 13

Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke is a man with a lot of enemies. The former archbishop of St. Louis, who once said supporters of abortion rights shouldn’t receive communion, became the highest-ranking American in the Vatican during the tenure of former Pope Benedict on the strength of unabashed conservatism. But as soon as Pope Francis arrived on the scene, that same conservatism turned divisive when Burke criticized Francis’s progressive policies.

For example, Burke, who headed the Vatican’s highest court of canon law, lampooned Francis in a Buzzfeed interview late last year. He said Francis had “done a lot of harm. … The pope is not free to change the church’s teachings with regard to the immorality of homosexual acts.” Weeks later, the pope booted the rampaging cardinal, who had come to symbolize the so-called “Culture Wars” roiling the Vatican, demoting him to a ceremonial post with the charity group Knights of Malta.

At the time, many believed the demotion would in some ways empower the cardinal to take more vocal stances against what he perceives to be a wayward church. Those suspicions have now been realized.

Last week, Cardinal Raymond Burke delivered a whopper of a manifesto in an interview with something called “The Emangelization,” which seeks to restore a sense of manliness to men in the church. In the interview, Burke offered a lengthy meditation on what he perceives to be the problem with the modern church. Most of them began, he said, with the advent of the women’s rights movement during the 1960s, which pushed for female participation in the Catholic Church. He derided it as “radical feminism.”

When that happened, the “goodness and importance of men became very obscured,” which gave rise to a “very feminized” Church, he said: “There was a period of time when men who were feminized and confused about their own sexual identity had entered the priesthood; sadly some of these disordered men sexually abused minors; a terrible tragedy for which the Church mourns.”

While he directs most of his ire at “radical feminists,” he also appears rankled by ordinary women doing ordinary Church activities. To him, that act alone constitutes the dangerous feminization of the Church that has alienated, disenchanted and made men sexually confused.

“Apart from the priest, the sanctuary has become full of women,” Burke continued. “The activities in the parish and even the liturgy have been influenced by women and become so feminine in many places that men do not want to get involved. Men are often reluctant to become active in the Church. The feminized environment and the lack of the Church’s effort to engage men has led many men to simply opt out.”

Most priests started off as altar boys, a position, he said, that “requires a certain manly discipline.” But then in 1983, the Church dropped its ban on girls serving as altar assistants. That move, Burke said, made young men uncomfortable and unwilling to participate in altar services, leading to an eventual shortage of priests. “The introduction of girl servers also led many boys to abandon altar service,” he told Emangelization. “Young boys don’t want to do things with girls. It’s just natural. The girls were also very good at altar service. So many boys drifted away over time.”

That church decision was just one aspect of what Burke perceived as a nascent “radical feminist movement” that would lead the Church to “constantly address women’s issues at the expense of addressing critical issues important to men … the critical impact of manly character; the emphasis on the particular gifts that God gives men.”

Burke didn’t just see the changes inside the Church. He saw it everywhere. Men, thanks to women wanting equality, were scared. “Young men [were] telling me that they were, in a certain way, frightened by marriage because of the radicalizing and self-focused attitudes of women that were emerging at that time,” he told his interviewer, Matthew James Christoff. “These young men were concerned that entering a marriage would simply not work because of the constant and insistent demanding of rights of women. … Sadly, Church has not effectively reacted to these destructive cultural forces; instead the Church has become too influenced by radical feminism and has largely ignored the serious needs of men.”

And men had lots of serious issues, Burke said. Like addiction to pornography. And masturbation. “This is lethal for men, especially young men,” he said. “Young men may begin to engage in the sexual sin of masturbation. Men have told me that when they were teenagers, they confessed the sin of masturbation in the confessional and priests would say, ‘Oh, that’s nothing you should be confessing. Everybody does that.’ That’s wrong. These are sinful acts.”

Still, Burke expressed some optimism. He was pleased by the manliness of some new priests. “Our seminaries are beginning to attract many strong young men who desire to serve God as priests,” he said. “The new crop of young men are manly and confident about their identity. This is a welcome development.”

In all, it was a grave discussion between two men on the state of man, which ended with them congratulating each other for doing everything they can do for men.

“Matthew, I want to commend you,” Burke told the interviewer.

“Praise God,” Christoff replied.

Then they both laughed.

Former highest-ranking U.S. cardinal blames ‘feminization’ for the Catholic Church’s problems - The Washington Post

Not surprising. Their god-book demands the repression of women. Don't imagine we'll hear many Christians condemning this bigot.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
I don't agree with all of that old priests opinions, he is right about one thing. Birth rates will drop dramatically with equal rights of women.

Cause no one wants to marry those crazy feminists.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Not surprising. Their god-book demands the repression of women. Don't imagine we'll hear many Christians condemning this bigot.
That's what you end up with when you let the Church make improvements to the original book which was not given in Latin. Firts the 'authorities' fuk up a perfectly good document (bible or constitution, take you pick the outcome is the same) and then you get the corrupted version and then you do **** to correct it and then lay the blame on the author of the original book which is unlike what the RCC pedals.
A question for points. How much does God dislike women when it is a woman who wrote the Gospel of John (the Baptist) and Revelation? (and is the subject of 3 Epistles)
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
That's what you end up with when you let the Church make improvements to the original book which was not given in Latin. Firts the 'authorities' fuk up a perfectly good document (bible or constitution, take you pick the outcome is the same) and then you get the corrupted version and then you do **** to correct it and then lay the blame on the author of the original book which is unlike what the RCC pedals.
A question for points. How much does God dislike women when it is a woman who wrote the Gospel of John (the Baptist) and Revelation? (and is the subject of 3 Epistles)

So I would guess you can read Hebrew and Aramic the languages of the first written Bible, because the first translation was in Latin then later on all the other languages....
If you can read Hebrew...prove it!
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
With overpopulation it's a good way to control the problem.

But we need population growth so we are forced to import population.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
So I would guess you can read Hebrew and Aramic the languages of the first written Bible, because the first translation was in Latin then later on all the other languages....
If you can read Hebrew...prove it!
Pull out some words.

The Bible was in Hebrew for the OT and Greek for the NT. The KJV1611 edition had the OT translated by Jews in Jerusalem. You going to promote they fuked it up when translating it into English?

Link up there fat boy cause you are full of **** once again? This is from the KJV1611 preface.
"If you ask what they had before them, truly it was the Hebrew text of the Old Testament, the Greek of the New. "

This guy would get along perfectly with the muzzies.
I play good with everyone, you would be the one in danger shortly after opening your yapper.

You be sure to let us know when we get close to extinction, mmm-kay?
Trying to take all the fun away?
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
It was a fireside story, spoken until there was no danger of Romans finding text long before it was written down - thus likely to be tainted by exaggerations and gossip.

I'm sure you're familiar with that....
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
It was a fireside story, spoken until there was no danger of Romans finding text long before it was written down - thus likely to be tainted by exaggerations and gossip.

I'm sure you're familiar with that....
Yep, Dex adopted that version, that doesn't make it the right one.. I can see where having a book called Romans might have put a kink into that stealth move. Especially Chapter 13 where it tells Christians to pay their taxes and don't cause the Government to put you in jail or kill you.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
How many women do you know that use a whet-stone on their knitting needles? Sometimes it's the quiet ones you have to watch out for.

To the poster above, that answer in the post before your question answer your question?
 
Last edited: