This is a tribal situation and the pent up emotions of hatred are a powerful thing.
Iraq was tribal too but there was oil.
The fact remains the world has not evolved with progress at the same time.
We cannot simply go marching in to every trouble spot and order everyone
to stop killing each other either on moral or economic grounds.
America fought a bloody civil war for four years and they ended up with the
nation becoming one again because the mainstream society decided enough
was enough. Had France and Britain interfered sending troops into the region
the outcome might have been quite different.
If people are hell bent on killing each other they will kill each other until the two
sides have had enough.
It is not our place to go into every troubled country and settle their differences
and bleed our resources dry doing it. What happens inside the borders of a
country is for the people to sort out themselves.
what?I just see myself in a pot of boiling water with all these natives dancing around me.
--Idiot Toronto Mayor
yeah that's why I asked first,Steady now...not necessarily Robert...there have been many, many idiot Toronto Mayors. Some more stoopider than others and some with big flappy lips and loose rattly brain stems.
All you said is the core point that Is letting uncivilized nation rised right or colonizing uncivilized territory right. I think colonizing is right.This is a tribal situation and the pent up emotions of hatred are a powerful thing.
Iraq was tribal too but there was oil.
The fact remains the world has not evolved with progress at the same time.
We cannot simply go marching in to every trouble spot and order everyone
to stop killing each other either on moral or economic grounds.
America fought a bloody civil war for four years and they ended up with the
nation becoming one again because the mainstream society decided enough
was enough. Had France and Britain interfered sending troops into the region
the outcome might have been quite different.
If people are hell bent on killing each other they will kill each other until the two
sides have had enough.
It is not our place to go into every troubled country and settle their differences
and bleed our resources dry doing it. What happens inside the borders of a
country is for the people to sort out themselves.
All you said is the core point that Is letting uncivilized nation rised right or colonizing uncivilized territory right. I think colonizing is right.
You can see HongKong as a example. The most people of HongKong will choose live under Queen of Briain rather than the Chinese GOVT now. Because they live like a gentleman in BE and a animal in Chinese GOVT. The advanced western society have the responsbility to look after the uncivilized world like Holy Roman Empire did.
The Self-Determination of Thomas Woodrow Wilson is completely wrong. Look at what the uncivilized nations did after their self-determination.Killing,fighting,dictatorship. They cant be more civilized by themselfs. The villain was covered by the political right of The Self-Determination. SO, the The Self-Determination rule must be broken. I am waitting for a whole new Holy Roman Ally accross the world.This is a tribal situation and the pent up emotions of hatred are a powerful thing.
Iraq was tribal too but there was oil.
The fact remains the world has not evolved with progress at the same time.
We cannot simply go marching in to every trouble spot and order everyone
to stop killing each other either on moral or economic grounds.
America fought a bloody civil war for four years and they ended up with the
nation becoming one again because the mainstream society decided enough
was enough. Had France and Britain interfered sending troops into the region
the outcome might have been quite different.
If people are hell bent on killing each other they will kill each other until the two
sides have had enough.
It is not our place to go into every troubled country and settle their differences
and bleed our resources dry doing it. What happens inside the borders of a
country is for the people to sort out themselves.
Yes, they also were conquered by the nationalists under Chinese GOVT.You mean rule them as conquered peoples.
The pic is Beijing subway. A woman is peeing.
Ofcouse not. The nationalism is also a disease in western ally. But it is softer. If you lived in China, you will see the nationalism is the only one thing that giving publicity to by the GOVT. In fact the Chinese GOVT is based only on the nationalism.Then you are comfortable with the mass murder of those within those countries that fight?
Hong Kong was free Goob and did have an amazing economy, it isn't all bad when a country is colonized, to conclude that is just as wrong as saying it was civilizing barbarians.You mean rule them as conquered peoples.
Hong Kong was free Goob and did have an amazing economy, it isn't all bad when a country is colonized, to conclude that is just as wrong as saying it was civilizing barbarians.
' conclude that is just as wrong as saying it was civilizing barbarians' I am sorry I dont understand what you mean.Hong Kong was free Goob and did have an amazing economy, it isn't all bad when a country is colonized, to conclude that is just as wrong as saying it was civilizing barbarians.
' conclude that is just as wrong as saying it was civilizing barbarians' I am sorry I dont understand what you mean.