Ford finally faces legal action.

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
Ford finally faces legal action.
or doesn't...

Stay tuned for more spin doctoring!


Carry on
Ruff.


Well, it is a good thing that you are retired now and we no longer trust you with weapons or heavy machinery, because I think you might be off your rocker.

Dale served him with a libel notice and got exactly what he asked for. What better result could he have hoped for?
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,483
678
113
59
Alberta
Well, it is a good thing that you are retired now and we no longer trust you with weapons or heavy machinery, because I think you might be off your rocker.

Dale served him with a libel notice and got exactly what he asked for. What better result could he have hoped for?

You are the gift that just keeps on giving...
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
And the reporter did not accept it. He then stated that legal action would continue.

I think you are a bit behind in the news cycle. He did accept it when "Ford"(aka his lawyers) actually retracted his statement and apologized.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
I think you are a bit behind in the news cycle. He did accept it when "Ford"(aka his lawyers) actually retracted his statement and apologized.

Rob Ford releases humbling apology admitting there was ‘absolutely no basis’ to kids remarks about reporter | National Post
It was Mr. Ford’s second official apology to Mr. Dale. On Tuesday, he said in council chambers that he “never called Mr. Dale a pedophile” and did not intend to suggest as much, but the reporter rejected it as insufficient, claiming Mr. Ford “didn’t retract anything at all.”

Reading a statement on Tuesday, Mr. Ford had said he “never called Mr. Dale a pedophile. I have never used that word to describe Mr. Dale. I do not believe Mr. Dale is a pedophile, nor did I intend to suggest that in my comments. It is unfortunate that the word I did not say has been ascribed to me by the media but I wish to sincerely apologize again to Mr. Dale if my actual words have caused him any harm or personal offence.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
Rob Ford releases humbling apology admitting there was ‘absolutely no basis’ to kids remarks about reporter | National Post
It was Mr. Ford’s second official apology to Mr. Dale. On Tuesday, he said in council chambers that he “never called Mr. Dale a pedophile” and did not intend to suggest as much, but the reporter rejected it as insufficient, claiming Mr. Ford “didn’t retract anything at all.”

Reading a statement on Tuesday, Mr. Ford had said he “never called Mr. Dale a pedophile. I have never used that word to describe Mr. Dale. I do not believe Mr. Dale is a pedophile, nor did I intend to suggest that in my comments. It is unfortunate that the word I did not say has been ascribed to me by the media but I wish to sincerely apologize again to Mr. Dale if my actual words have caused him any harm or personal offence.

The key part missing in his statement on Tuesday was the retraction. He didn't retract his statements, but actually reaffirmed them. Obviously that is not what his libel noticed called for.
 

Cobalt_Kid

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,760
17
38
Wonder which lawyer wrote Ford's "apology".

Daniel Dale Drops Rob Ford Lawsuit After Mayor Issues Second Apology

"Further to my public apology to Daniel Dale yesterday, I want to be as clear as possible with respect to the extent of the apology and ensure that it addresses Mr. Dale's concerns about comments which aired during my interview with Conrad Black on ZoomerMedia.

"An incident involving Mr. Dale occurred near my residence in May 2012, more than 1 1/2 years ago.

"In my interview with Mr. Black, I recounted that I caught the individual, 'on the bricks, over the fence, taking pictures' and that he 'dropped his phone, dropped his camera and everything.' Also I stated 'it was on my property, on the fence. And he had cinderblocks that he had to step on to get over the fence. And he started taking pictures.'

"This recollection of the incident is inaccurate in that I never saw Mr. Dale standing on bricks or cinderblocks, never saw Mr. Dale looking over my fence and never saw Mr. Dale taking any pictures. There is no basis for saying as I did on December 17 and in the past that Mr. Dale was 'lurking' or 'leering' near or over my fence or behaving surreptitiously and I should not have said that. In the interview with Mr. Black I was recounting what I had initially been told by a neighbour. There was a police investigation at the time and no charges were laid against Mr. Dale, who I understand told police that he never stood on cinderblocks, never looked over my fence and never took photographs of my backyard. There was no basis for me to say that Mr. Dale was ever in my backyard or on my property and I should not have said that. Accordingly, I apologize to Mr. Dale for the inaccurate manner in which I described the incident of May 2012.

"With respect to my recollection that Mr. Dale at the time of the incident dropped his phone, dropped his camera and everything. I apologize to Mr. Dale for the impression that these words suggest Mr. Dale was at the time carrying a separate camera. Mr. Dale was carrying a cell phone, with photograph capabilities, and this is what I meant during my conversation with Mr. Black. I am unaware of any pictures Mr. Dale took with his phone of land near my property, and therefore I apologize to Mr. Dale if the words I spoke to Mr. Black left the impression that Mr. Dale had taken photographs of my backyard. I understand from Mr. Dale that while he had attempted to take a photograph of land adjacent to my actual property, the battery power on his phone died at the time of taking a photograph and therefore no photograph of adjacent land was ever saved onto the phone. Accordingly, I once again apologize to Mr. Dale for the imprecise and inaccurate manner in which I described the events which followed our encounter in May 2012.

"Finally there was absolutely no basis for the statement I made about Mr. Dale taking pictures of children, or for any insinuations I made. I should not have said what I did and I wholly retract my statements and apologize to Mr. Dale without reservation for what I said.

"I sincerely hope that Mr. Dale will accept my personal apology for my comments and all harm my words may have caused him."
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,483
678
113
59
Alberta

Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.

Or maybe not so much...
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.Ford finally faces legal action.

Or maybe not so much...

Care to explain how being served with a libel notice is not legal action?


It is also funny that they didn't even trust him to read the damn thing in public. You just know he would have ad libbed something horrific.

"Oh and the last thing was Daniel Dale, it says that I said he wanted to @#$%$ @#$ @$# !@# @#$ %$#$ little !@#%@....."
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,483
678
113
59
Alberta
Care to explain how being served with a libel notice is not legal action?



It is also funny that they didn't even trust him to read the damn thing in public. You just know he would have ad libbed something horrific.

"Oh and the last thing was Daniel Dale, it says that I said he wanted to @#$%$ @#$ @$# !@# @#$ %$#$ little !@#%@....."

You back
again. Come to join your buddy
COBALT KID in a little damage control posting.
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
You back
again. Come to join your buddy
COBALT KID in a little damage control posting.

So that would be a no, you can't explain how being served with a notice of libel is not a legal action?

I don't know if you are aware, but rightness or wrongness is not proportional to the number or size of the emoticons that you use.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,483
678
113
59
Alberta
So that would be a no, you can't explain how being served with a notice of libel is not a legal action?

I don't know if you are aware, but rightness or wrongness is not proportional to the number or size of the emoticons that you use.

Thank you Bornruff you continue to give and give.

No emoticon required.

Cobalt: Now he's going to start paying a legal price for his irresponsibility.

Cobalt: RoFo is probably going to need those millions he and his brother love to throw around like confetti.

Or maybe not so much...
 

BornRuff

Time Out
Nov 17, 2013
3,175
0
36
Cobalt: Now he's going to start paying a legal price for his irresponsibility.

Cobalt: RoFo is probably going to need those millions he and his brother love to throw around like confetti.

Or maybe not so much...

Answer me this. Why do you think that this matter didn't go further?