I was just wondering where you got the idea that "pulling out" was an acceptable form of birth control.
It was a joke... be a good Catholic and pull out..
Jesus gives you face palm.
I was just wondering where you got the idea that "pulling out" was an acceptable form of birth control.
It was a joke... be a good Catholic and pull out..
Jesus gives you face palm.
well...I missed that since pulling out has nothing to do with Catholics and birth control, Abstinence and the rhythm method.
Well, pulling out is generally lumped in with the rhythm method and other "non birth control" forms of birth control; so to a religion that basically forbids birth control, they altogether become the shabbos goy of the Catholics.
Harper says he won't reopen abortion debate - Canada Votes 2011 - CBC News#
If Stephen Harper has any integrity, at least he will keep his word and vote it down.
I was referring to Victorian Times as the rule for the current social conservative movement.
They don't have anything else to do accept determine how we should all behave.
They are ignoring the fact that we live in a different world.
It should also be pointed out that Britain has not official human rights constitution, they are
a constitutional monarchy. We do have a bill of individual human rights. Women have the
control of their own bodies and that is good enough for me. There are some rules and as
long as those rules are followed leave things alone. This country is in enough trouble without
opening old wounds.
Human life, yes. Human being, no. Fetuses that are not viable are incomplete. Kind of like a germinated seed can't be called a tree.
Impossible!!! According to the Usual Suspects, he's a fascist social conservative hell bent on Christian/Americanizing Canada!!!In the latest news, it seems Harper does in fact intend to vote it down.
Pppht!!!!But if science accepts that human life begins at conception, should the constitution not also confirm life begins at conception so as to conform with science, or should we ignore scientists and determine it rather by the whims and fancies of politicians?
Tell an expectant mother that the bump, that won't stop moving in her belly, doesn't exist. Man, was your last sentence ever dumb.Are you aware that life does not begin until birth? Or didn't you get the memo? Wether that birth is after 7 months or 9 months is irrelevant unless it can breath on its own. You can not murder something that does not exist.
Athiesm is a religion.I've met anti-abortion atheists, so I doubt you can sum up any argument that simply.
But they do have an overwhelming confidence in science Mach!Honestly, though, I find the motion presented to the House is quite reasonable: he's essentially asking that a committee study the matter of when life begins, which would naturally involve having to invite scientists too. I guess the NDP is scared stiff about that. If they had a little more confidence in science, the NDP would welcome this motion.
Evil hidden agendas aside. What about the science Nugg?:angry6:..........MPs to consider debate on when human life begins - Politics - CBC News
In the case of these damn fundies, human life never begins.
Assholes!!
:angry6:..........MPs to consider debate on when human life begins - Politics - CBC News
In the case of these damn fundies, human life never begins.
Assholes!!
Maybe you lump it in, I never have. Also, the "rhythm method" is a recognized form of birth control, whereas "pulling out" is a teen boys' line used to try and get into a teen girls pants.
the situation respecting a woman’s right to control her own person becomes more complex when she becomes pregnant
Individual human life begins at the moment of birth. Until the fetus leaves the womb and is sustaining itself in the open environment it is a parasitic part of the mother. End of story!!!!!
Tell an expectant mother that the bump, that won't stop moving in her belly, doesn't exist. Man, was your last sentence ever dumb.
Athiesm is a religion.
So pulling the plug on people unable to breath on their own should be easy peasy.OK let me rephrase that for the simple minded. You cannot kill something that is not alive. Until it breathes unaided it is not alive.
Bingo!Using the religious definition of life at contraception would make the mother guilty of murder if she was to spontaneously abort.