
I was fortunate enough that my parents did not force any religion on me. They were from different protestant religions, not sure which. But being raised in a logging camp we didn't get to a church very often. There was a group that came to camp every sunday to do a church thing for the adults and a sunday school for us that we were forced to go to. As a result I chose not to have any religion. I can't even really be called an atheist because I simply don't care if there is a god or not, and if all the preachers that diddle little kids and kill those who have other beliefs are an example of religious behaviour and gods messengers then I don't want any part of it.
This way I cannot be called a hypocrite.

i am happy with the way i am because i am free to believe what religion i want and i can pick the wisdom of my religion without any pressure on me , but if i were in the other countries who experience İslam , i'm sure i would be an atheist...

Atheists and people who have a religion aren't that different. Both have to make a leap of faith. In the case of Jews, Christians and Muslims, they believe there is a god, even though they can't prove it. Atheists believe there is no god, even though the can't prove it. That's why I'm agnostic. Until I see proof one way or the other, I refuse to commit myself. In the meantime, I try others as I'd have them treat me. We are all brothers and sisters of a very large extended family. Which is why I see the earth_as_one.

Just because you cannot detect an apple growing on the end of one of your fingers, doesn't prove its non-existance. Maybe one is there, but you lack the ability to detect it. I admit the chances are unlikely or even beyond a reasonable doubt, but they aren't zero. Proving the non-existance of something, is a logical impossibility. Just like you can't prove the non-existance of leprechauns, bigfoot and Saddam Hussein's WMD stockpiles.
For the same reason, you can't prove God's non-existance. Therefore atheists have to believe there is no god. Atheism is a belief based system. Like I said, leaps of faith rely upon assumptions.
In your opinion, that there is no God, may be beyond a reasonable doubt. Human beings have a primitive understanding of the Universe. God could be a reasonable approximation of the truth about the nature of the universe and its creation and you can't prove I'm wrong...
g-n
s
t
k)n.1. a. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
Its a philosophical dilema Les. The question of God's existance is non-sensical or not a logical question, since it can't be disproven. It could be proven, but it hasn't. So it remains an unanswered question. Both atheists and theist believe they know the answer but they can't support their believe with conclusive evidence.
That's why Agnosticism is the only logical position regarding this question:
ag·nos·tic (g-n
s
t
k)n.1. a. One who believes that it is impossible to know whether there is a God.
b. One who is skeptical about the existence of God but does not profess true atheism.

I don't have to. I am atheist because I simply accept that there are no gods because I accept there is not a shred of evidence for them. I don't even have to prove anything to myself, let alone anyone else. It isn't a matter of belief or disbelief with me anymore.
Like I said, I don't need a leap of faith to tell me there's no apple there. If you want me to prove there's no apple there, I will call 911 for the guys with extra long arms on their white PJs and direct them to you.Simple, neh? IOW, just because I cannot prove there are no gods doesn't mean there are gods nor does it mean that you can prove there are.

I don't like delving into these kind of threads because they end up being dominated by extremists, however, I will add this; you and I seem to have experienced an extreme difference in aboriginal beliefs. My experince has been with those whose are very close to the beliefs of the the OT; mainly, there is one deity, the Creator, the Great Spirit, and as it was put to me, the Bible was written for those who had fallen out of favour with Him. The native tribes had not yet suffered this fate, but soon would, as we all would or did. The use of the masculine in written or oral history is used the same as it is in contracts, but male and female is a mortal experience, it is non existant in the spirit world, for that reason God cannot be a "she" either.

The aboriginal people believe in an anthropomorphous creator but they alsobelieve the Earth is our mother, that she is the origin of life and the provider of all they need. In that way they view her as a goddess and cohort of the Creator as symbolized by the sun.They also recognized the influence of the moon on the cycles of life, referring to her as Grandmother Moon. So although they believed in the one creator, they also had lesser deities. ..........

Which is fine until we found out that the building blocks for the beginning of life might have come from off-planet. lol
Still, it all seems more natural than having some god invent itself in order to invent a universe, etc. That's just stretching the rubber band of reason til it breaks.

Kinda like the Genesis bomb on Startrek. But the qualifier is the "might" have.
gods tend to get in the way of reasonable thought and personal responsibility.

either way, responsibility is not needed when you can blame gods and demons for your actions.

The beauty in never saying it's my fault.. Us humans have a great way to wash away "sin"..

A prime example of 3 men that don't have a clue what they are talking about.

Good evening gerryh. I was brought up catholic so I know a little bit about that institution. I have also spent most of my adult life studying comparative religions and philosophies, so I do know something about that. Any yes, I have a lot of strong opinions about the subject, some of them almost as strong as your own, though I doubt we would agree much on the subject. None the less, I do respect your right to believe what you want but I was hoping that you would at least have a counter argument to the views expressed. Please take into consideration, the those views that I express are only my opinion and in no way reflect upon your belief system, just mine. I am open to be proven wrong.

For the same reason, you can't prove God's non-existance. Therefore atheists have to believe there is no god. Atheism is a belief based system.
In your opinion, that there is no God, may be beyond a reasonable doubt. Human beings have a primitive understanding of the Universe. God could be a reasonable approximation of the truth about the nature of the universe and its creation and you can't prove I'm wrong...

Sorry.... been through these threads and have already seen what you and your buddies do when it comes to discussion, as a matter of fact, my comments above are right in line with how you guys "discuss" things in the spirituality threads when it comes to Christianity, Islam, and Catholicism in particular.

The aboriginal people believe in an anthropomorphous creator but they alsobelieve the Earth is our mother, that she is the origin of life and the provider of all they need. In that way they view her as a goddess and cohort of the Creator as symbolized by the sun.They also recognized the influence of the moon on the cycles of life, referring to her as Grandmother Moon. So although they believed in the one creator, they also had lesser deities.
They also believed in the power of animal and plant spirits to help them navigate through life. Every animal has a set of characteristics that correspond to various human traits and virtues. Thus a bear represent inner strength, coyote is cunning, deer is beauty and innocence, wolf is wisdom, etc. Animals can help a person know themselves better and help through trying times.
I don't think your understanding is different than mine but you may not have delved into it to the extent that I have.