Dollar tops 94 cents US
- Thread starter CBC News
- Start date
Hey Toro, what do you make of this ?
Kuwait split raises questions over longevity of the dollar
By Jim Grant
May 31 2007
When the Roman emperor Constantine struck off a new gold coin, he expected it to give good, durable service. And the extra-durable solidus did - about 700 years' worth. Modern monetary systems have a somewhat shorter shelf life.
That the current monetary system may not last for the ages was underscored the other day by Kuwait's decision to uncouple its dinar from the US dollar. For years, the two had been lashed together as a preliminary to the projected creation of a common Persian Gulf currency.
But the more the dollar's value sagged, the more dollars the members of the Gulf Co-operation Council have had to absorb just to maintain the desired exchange rates. Naturally, the central banks of the participating countries did not acquire their dollars with nothing. They printed the local currencies with which to buy them and the more they printed, the more that inflation welled up. Now Kuwait has chosen to go its own way, leaving Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain to ponder their tolerance for open-ended dollar-buying. Little Kuwait just might be the herald of big change, both in the dollar's fortunes and the world's monetary organisation. To a degree, the world turns on open-ended dollar buying and the muscular feats of money-printing it calls forth.
Hard-working Asians (and oil-blessed Arabs) consume much less than they produce. Americans, on the other hand, produce much less than they consume. But the savers and spenders do have something in common. The workers are happy to receive dollars, and the consumers are more than happy to print them. Unlike the solidus, a greenback has no intrinsic value. It is faith-based. Here is a new idea in the world. Certainly, the unsystematic world monetary system is a new arrangement. Up until 1971, the dollar was collateralised by gold. If you were a central bank, $35 would get you an ounce on demand. The system gave good, durable service until the US started to run out of bullion. On August 15 1971, the dollar became uncollateralised. Exchange rates started to float - or to sink or be pegged. Governments made it up as they went along.
That the paper dollar finds favour the world over must be counted as one of the greatest achievements in the annals of money. To be sure, the central banks of the Middle East and Asia have had their own reasons for stockpiling the greenback and US securities. But their self-interest doesn't detract from the rarity of the historical moment. To paraphrase Richard Nixon, the president who closed the US gold window, we are all dollar bulls now.
Or rather, we are up to a point of saturation, a point that Kuwait seems to have finally reached. Its neighbours, too, appear to be on the edge of dollar surfeit. Broad money growth in the Gulf region is running at 20 per cent, in no small part a consequence of rampant dollar absorption.
"Inflation is a hot topic in the kingdom," the Financial Times reported from Riyadh recently, "as city residents feel the pinch of rental and price increases suddenly feeding into an economy that has grown used to inflation of around 1 per cent a year since the 1970s." The Saudi statistics gatherers today acknowledge a current rate of 3 per cent.
Since the international gold standard perished in 1914, successive global monetary systems have been brought down by external shocks or internal contradictions. Inflation is the bane of our non-system system. Inflation is a disease of one main cause but varied symptoms. A surfeit of money can cause derangement at the checkout counter (India), in the real-estate market (Russia) or on the stock exchange (China).
By upsetting the integrity of prices, it can disturb the architecture of production. In most of the dollar-buying states, monetary growth is fast enough to upset the eternal rest of Milton Friedman. In all cases, a slower pace of dollar absorption is an integral part of a monetary cure. It will be said that only some members of the dollar-buying bloc want to be cured. The rest - notably, China - are happy to keep on cranking the monetary presses. But the upward track of US interest rates and the downward path of the dollar exchange rate tell a different story. One thing's for sure, the greenback ain't the solidus.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/f2f3a8a8-0f12-11dc-b444-000b5df10621.html
Kuwait split raises questions over longevity of the dollar
By Jim Grant
May 31 2007
When the Roman emperor Constantine struck off a new gold coin, he expected it to give good, durable service. And the extra-durable solidus did - about 700 years' worth. Modern monetary systems have a somewhat shorter shelf life.
That the current monetary system may not last for the ages was underscored the other day by Kuwait's decision to uncouple its dinar from the US dollar. For years, the two had been lashed together as a preliminary to the projected creation of a common Persian Gulf currency.
But the more the dollar's value sagged, the more dollars the members of the Gulf Co-operation Council have had to absorb just to maintain the desired exchange rates. Naturally, the central banks of the participating countries did not acquire their dollars with nothing. They printed the local currencies with which to buy them and the more they printed, the more that inflation welled up. Now Kuwait has chosen to go its own way, leaving Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain to ponder their tolerance for open-ended dollar-buying. Little Kuwait just might be the herald of big change, both in the dollar's fortunes and the world's monetary organisation. To a degree, the world turns on open-ended dollar buying and the muscular feats of money-printing it calls forth.
Hard-working Asians (and oil-blessed Arabs) consume much less than they produce. Americans, on the other hand, produce much less than they consume. But the savers and spenders do have something in common. The workers are happy to receive dollars, and the consumers are more than happy to print them. Unlike the solidus, a greenback has no intrinsic value. It is faith-based. Here is a new idea in the world. Certainly, the unsystematic world monetary system is a new arrangement. Up until 1971, the dollar was collateralised by gold. If you were a central bank, $35 would get you an ounce on demand. The system gave good, durable service until the US started to run out of bullion. On August 15 1971, the dollar became uncollateralised. Exchange rates started to float - or to sink or be pegged. Governments made it up as they went along.
That the paper dollar finds favour the world over must be counted as one of the greatest achievements in the annals of money. To be sure, the central banks of the Middle East and Asia have had their own reasons for stockpiling the greenback and US securities. But their self-interest doesn't detract from the rarity of the historical moment. To paraphrase Richard Nixon, the president who closed the US gold window, we are all dollar bulls now.
Or rather, we are up to a point of saturation, a point that Kuwait seems to have finally reached. Its neighbours, too, appear to be on the edge of dollar surfeit. Broad money growth in the Gulf region is running at 20 per cent, in no small part a consequence of rampant dollar absorption.
"Inflation is a hot topic in the kingdom," the Financial Times reported from Riyadh recently, "as city residents feel the pinch of rental and price increases suddenly feeding into an economy that has grown used to inflation of around 1 per cent a year since the 1970s." The Saudi statistics gatherers today acknowledge a current rate of 3 per cent.
Since the international gold standard perished in 1914, successive global monetary systems have been brought down by external shocks or internal contradictions. Inflation is the bane of our non-system system. Inflation is a disease of one main cause but varied symptoms. A surfeit of money can cause derangement at the checkout counter (India), in the real-estate market (Russia) or on the stock exchange (China).
By upsetting the integrity of prices, it can disturb the architecture of production. In most of the dollar-buying states, monetary growth is fast enough to upset the eternal rest of Milton Friedman. In all cases, a slower pace of dollar absorption is an integral part of a monetary cure. It will be said that only some members of the dollar-buying bloc want to be cured. The rest - notably, China - are happy to keep on cranking the monetary presses. But the upward track of US interest rates and the downward path of the dollar exchange rate tell a different story. One thing's for sure, the greenback ain't the solidus.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/f2f3a8a8-0f12-11dc-b444-000b5df10621.html
Did you confuse this thread with the "my dick is bigger then your dick? thread Blackleaf?
Yes Blackleaf, I so envy your currency cock. Now why don't you be a good lad and stick your currency dick where the sun don't shine?
So we got Big Currency Members and Little Wee Currency Members.
So is the Euro the new Viagradinero ?
Will Kuwait get large by going Euro ?
Es poco la dolares ?
Es giganto euro ?
So is the Euro the new Viagradinero ?
Will Kuwait get large by going Euro ?
Es poco la dolares ?
Es giganto euro ?
Blimey, my flatmate was sort of correct...
Does this mean the US dollars that have been printed are much more than the reserved gold?
So over time it would be merely paper...
I actually didn't read that at all from Blackleaf's post...
But speaking of which, you guys are still considered prosper... imagine say in Indonesia 1US$ is about 8,791 Rupiah (IDR) according to today's Yahoo Finance...
Imagine of they decided to get rid of that annoying paper for their 1 and 2 Rupiah bills and replace them with big coins with birds and bears on them. Immagine goint to the store with that and buying a $1 USD soda.
Except that you seem to hail from Canada which makes you dick about 2 1/2 times smaller than you claim it is. :lol: