#121
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 12th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by #juan
Duh!!!I don't care what the court says.
Does that really change anything? Of course not.
Ruby Dhalla
#122
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 12th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by L Gilbert
The suit was dropped and the government paid court costs. Mulroney did not receive $50 million.Reminds me, I think if I was gov't I'd make Bullroney pay back the $50M that he got in the defamation suit he brought against Canada.
--
Conservative
#123
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009
Ruby Dhalla is a liar. Not only is she a blatant liar, (almost expected in a politician) she is one nasty piece of work. Vicious, vindictive, and bordering on a slave-master, no respect for the law, elitist to the core. According to the Globe and Mail, the carefgivers were forbidden to sit at the same level as their superiors.
Thankfully, The testimony of the lady from Toronto's social agency yesterday (the one who made the "Pinnochio" crack
) fried the psycho-Bitch completely....... Ruby is toast.
Mulroney is scum........when he said he met KHS for "coffee" he PERJURED himself.....he lied under oath.....he did NOT meet KHS for "coffee": he met him to conduct business. I don't understand why no one has put it to him that way.
The slithering snake, the piece of crap..........after all his protestations that he was an "honest man"........enough to make you hurl.
Time to bring back the Stocks......for both of them. A week in the stocks would work wonders for their egos....and be soooo satisfying for the rest of us.
Thankfully, The testimony of the lady from Toronto's social agency yesterday (the one who made the "Pinnochio" crack
) fried the psycho-Bitch completely....... Ruby is toast.Mulroney is scum........when he said he met KHS for "coffee" he PERJURED himself.....he lied under oath.....he did NOT meet KHS for "coffee": he met him to conduct business. I don't understand why no one has put it to him that way.
The slithering snake, the piece of crap..........after all his protestations that he was an "honest man"........enough to make you hurl.
Time to bring back the Stocks......for both of them. A week in the stocks would work wonders for their egos....and be soooo satisfying for the rest of us.
Last edited by Colpy; May 15th, 2009 at 10:31 AM..
No Party Affiliation
#124
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Walter
Okay, the ex-prenier or PM or whatever he was (seems LA Times can't decide what he was lol) should pay back the $750,000 then.The suit was dropped and the government paid court costs. Mulroney did not receive $50 million.
--
Careful Colpy, you're starting to froth at the mouth and might pop an artery or something.
#125
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009
Phuk em. If they do the crime...do the time. Lib or Con. This is not about Liberals vs Conservative, as some would like to believe, but it's about a crooked politician who is about to get a smackdown.
Free Thinker
#126
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy
LoL, the stocks. I must say I oppose this on moral grounds, a person's dignity----Time to bring back the Stocks......for both of them. A week in the stocks would work wonders for their egos....and be soooo satisfying for the rest of us.
<hurls rotten cabbage>
---- should never be impugned in such fashion.
No Party Affiliation
#127
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy
That may have been true - and then this came out:Thankfully, The testimony of the lady from Toronto's social agency yesterday (the one who made the "Pinnochio" crack
--
Interesting that these nannies have made the same allegations against others too...
I don't think this is so cut and dry.
Conservative
#128
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by pegger
Yeah....not exactly cut and dried is correct, but I do think Agatha Mason trumps a hired lawyer........and I don't see that two sets of allegations discredits anyone. Caregivers are habitually abused.....they work, after all, for the rich.....That may have been true - and then this came out:
--
Interesting that these nannies have made the same allegations against others too...
I don't think this is so cut and dry.
How is this crap going to get them permanent resident status? One would assume they would be risking exactly the opposite......Dhalla is not without power, and the Liberals usually rule in this country.
I think the allegations are true........I thought so when they first came out, and after hearing testimony from Mason, I am sure Ruby is lying through her teeth.
#129
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009
In the 'old days', the politician involved was usually a man, and the whole thing could simply be passed off as a misunderstanding, because usually the person dealing with nannies and caregivers was the woman of the household. This allowed for a nice bit of wiggle room to keep the policitian from being directly implicated.
In this case, it's much harder, because the politician is the woman, and it seems like she is trying to put the responsibility for caregiver/nannies on her brother, but no matter what, in most families, it's the women who deal with this stuff practically, so she can't wiggle out.
I'm off to Tims, going to see if I can find any German busuinessmen with envelopes full of cash.
In this case, it's much harder, because the politician is the woman, and it seems like she is trying to put the responsibility for caregiver/nannies on her brother, but no matter what, in most families, it's the women who deal with this stuff practically, so she can't wiggle out.
I'm off to Tims, going to see if I can find any German busuinessmen with envelopes full of cash.
No Party Affiliation
#130
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009
I think I'll stick to voting for indies until one gets in and starts doing stupid things like party people seem to love doing. Then I'll have to reassess the issue of voting for them.
Um, good luck, TP.
Um, good luck, TP.
No Party Affiliation
#134
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009
You took an extra dose of goof this morning, LM?
#135
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by L Gilbert
You seem to forget that to some people........The Red Book is a Bible....You took an extra dose of goof this morning, LM?
No Party Affiliation
#136
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009
Yeah, I know it's a bible to some. And it makes me shake my head sometimes and laugh other times.
Quote:
quoting Paul Martin
Screw the Red Book... Don't tell me what's in the Red Book. I wrote the goddamned thing. And I know that it's a lot of crap.
#137
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by L Gilbert
Interesting. I'm leaning that way too. Could you imagine if even only 30% of MP's were indies. That would be ore than enough to give parties a run for our votes.I think I'll stick to voting for indies until one gets in and starts doing stupid things like party people seem to love doing. Then I'll have to reassess the issue of voting for them.
Um, good luck, TP.
But, Alas, we have too many Liberalmen and True Blew conservatives who'll vote for the party come hell or high waters even if the candidates is a complete doofus. But hey, we like the party colours and the nifty desin on the banner, and the party leader's got a certain hollywood charm, so the candidate must be good, right?
#138
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Liberalman
Right on, Liberalman, that's telling them. Yup, we should ask people as soon as they walk through the door what their ideological leanings are, and if they answer wrongly, we kick them out of the court house. Now that would be a great leap forward for justiceThe nanny rep who testified is a Conservative hack
#139
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Liberalman
Maybe, maybe not. I agree that those MP's who'd brought the issue up in Parliament were likely trying to win some poticial brownie points by sticking their legislative noses into judicial affairs. So much for division of powers.The Conservative party planned this smear
As for those MPs who did that, sure, I fully agree with grilling them on that decision. But judge the MP, not the party. To assume that a party member must be a borg is ridiculous. Some are, but not all are.
Conservative
#140
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Liberalman
Don't be an idiot.The nanny rep who testified is a Conservative hack
She is an immigrant, without permanent resident status.
she can't even vote.
Ruby Dhalla is a vicious lying psycho-bitch.
No Party Affiliation
#141
Re: Ruby Dhalla
May 15th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy
Open minded I see... Very non-partisan, objective view.Ruby Dhalla is a vicious lying psycho-bitch.
#142
Liberal M.P.Dalahia got off easy on this one
Jun 11th, 2009
Liberal M.P.Dalahia got off easy on this one..
This "importing foreign labour" program has to be reviewed...Stopped?..
Of course these 3 hired women were trying to get into Canada.That is the purpose of the program isn't it?..
What ever happened to these women?
Haven't heard much of them..?..
Guess sometimes being a public political figure can also be a good thing..!...
This program and issue smells of abuse..
This "importing foreign labour" program has to be reviewed...Stopped?..
Of course these 3 hired women were trying to get into Canada.That is the purpose of the program isn't it?..
What ever happened to these women?
Haven't heard much of them..?..
Guess sometimes being a public political figure can also be a good thing..!...
This program and issue smells of abuse..
No Party Affiliation
#143
Re: Ruby Dhalla
Sep 17th, 2009Quote: Originally Posted by Colpy
At the risk of re-animating this thread.... looks like your beloved Cons are so lily white eitherNow, I been waiting for days for someone to bring this up.
I didn't want to do it, for fear someone would think I was Liberal-bashing> (Perish the thought!)
Dear Ruby, Sweetheart of the Liberal Party of Canada, Cabinet minister, uncontested loveliest of them all, Champion of Canadian multiculturialism..........appears to be, in reality, an elitist psycho-bitch. (My heart leaps with joy!)
Of course - it's only cocaine possession, as charged by the police - nothing so evil as unsubstantiated claims...
Similar Threads
23