Hawkings former plumber
Posts: 9,291 
Videos: 1
Location: RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia Drive Apt 911
Videos: 1
Location: RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia Drive Apt 911
December 18th, 2007, 02:23 PM
Hello, praxius, welcome to here, have a nice time.
Hello, praxius, welcome to here, have a nice time.
Bright Spark
Posts: 476
Location: Zurich
Location: Zurich
December 18th, 2007, 03:15 PM
So, we all pull out of Afghanistan, announcing it a failed state and proposing to split Afghanistan between Iran and Pakistan. If they (Paki and Ira) disagree but want the land, we'll drop by when the war is over and pick up the pieces Soviet style, creating UN protectorate or something. If one doesn't want the land, we give it to the other. If they agree and want the land we'll split it between them and forget about Afghanistan.
Then we are back to dealing with Iran and Afghanistan only. Surely we couldn't give a more decrepit hole to two more deserving rats.
So, we all pull out of Afghanistan, announcing it a failed state and proposing to split Afghanistan between Iran and Pakistan. If they (Paki and Ira) disagree but want the land, we'll drop by when the war is over and pick up the pieces Soviet style, creating UN protectorate or something. If one doesn't want the land, we give it to the other. If they agree and want the land we'll split it between them and forget about Afghanistan.
Then we are back to dealing with Iran and Afghanistan only. Surely we couldn't give a more decrepit hole to two more deserving rats.
House Member
Posts: 4,518
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
December 18th, 2007, 04:00 PM
For goodness sake --- that was in 1971, dealt more with the nation's historic ethnic divide, and has no bearing on Musharraf and his crimes on the people of Pakistan today!
Since you are continually evading the issue, I suppose this is your concession that Musharraf should be sent to the gallows where he belongs.
Quoting Zzarchov
Oh it was a democracy eh?
Aren't you forgetting about Bangladesh seperating from Pakistan and WHY?
Aren't you forgetting about Bangladesh seperating from Pakistan and WHY?
For goodness sake --- that was in 1971, dealt more with the nation's historic ethnic divide, and has no bearing on Musharraf and his crimes on the people of Pakistan today!
Since you are continually evading the issue, I suppose this is your concession that Musharraf should be sent to the gallows where he belongs.
House Member
Posts: 3,096
December 18th, 2007, 08:01 PM
Because he took control over a country without resistance?
You act like he's Pinochet, involved in some gunbattle for power, murdering the rightful ruler. Those in power before him robbed the country blind then ran off leaving the place as they had what they wanted and had no more real use for the office. He got the place back on its feet then held elections.
Sure it isn't a picture perfect story, but its a far cry from a brutal dictator.
Because he took control over a country without resistance?
You act like he's Pinochet, involved in some gunbattle for power, murdering the rightful ruler. Those in power before him robbed the country blind then ran off leaving the place as they had what they wanted and had no more real use for the office. He got the place back on its feet then held elections.
Sure it isn't a picture perfect story, but its a far cry from a brutal dictator.
House Member
Posts: 4,518
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
December 19th, 2007, 07:35 AM
You keep changing the subject. Therefore, thanks for conceding that Pakistan's Musharraf deserves the hanging tree.
Quoting
Living until they die of old age?
Jeez, stop blaming Bush, its not his fault he got elected. Thats America's fault.
Jeez, stop blaming Bush, its not his fault he got elected. Thats America's fault.
You keep changing the subject. Therefore, thanks for conceding that Pakistan's Musharraf deserves the hanging tree.
House Member
Posts: 3,096
December 19th, 2007, 09:42 AM
Im changing the subject? You brought up Bush.
Game set and match, if changing the subject to Bush means your wrong (by your own words), I guess you concede you need stronger meds than you can get over the counter and should probably read a few more books and maybe get some life experience before making statements about places far away and death of those in them
Im changing the subject? You brought up Bush.
Quoting gopher
I suppose you mean to say Bush should have the same fate as Musharraf and Pinochet.
Game set and match, if changing the subject to Bush means your wrong (by your own words), I guess you concede you need stronger meds than you can get over the counter and should probably read a few more books and maybe get some life experience before making statements about places far away and death of those in them
The Angry Beaver
Posts: 3,660
Location: Atlantic Canada
Location: Atlantic Canada
December 19th, 2007, 10:20 AM
Quoting Zzarchov
Actually there is a lot of evidence which points towards both his elections being rigged so that he won (Against Gore and against Kerry) So it very well could be his fault... but it's also the fault of those who never did anything to question this.
Living until they die of old age?
Jeez, stop blaming Bush, its not his fault he got elected. Thats America's fault.
Jeez, stop blaming Bush, its not his fault he got elected. Thats America's fault.
House Member
Posts: 4,518
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
December 20th, 2007, 08:50 PM
```Game set and match, if changing the subject to Bush means your wrong```
Nice try. But wrong again.
The basis of this thread is that Bush needs to invade Pakistan in order to be consistent in his alleged principles.
pwned!
```Game set and match, if changing the subject to Bush means your wrong```
Nice try. But wrong again.
The basis of this thread is that Bush needs to invade Pakistan in order to be consistent in his alleged principles.
pwned!
House Member
Posts: 3,096
December 20th, 2007, 09:15 PM
Its "Game set and match" because no matter what you say on the matter you are contradicting one of your earlier posts.
but yes, you are "pwned".
Quoting gopher
In which case you are still wrong, as its your claim that talking about Bush means I've lost.
```Game set and match, if changing the subject to Bush means your wrong```
Nice try. But wrong again.
The basis of this thread is that Bush needs to invade Pakistan in order to be consistent in his alleged principles.
pwned!
Nice try. But wrong again.
The basis of this thread is that Bush needs to invade Pakistan in order to be consistent in his alleged principles.
pwned!
Its "Game set and match" because no matter what you say on the matter you are contradicting one of your earlier posts.
but yes, you are "pwned".
Hawkings former plumber
Posts: 9,291
Videos: 1
Location: RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia Drive Apt 911
Videos: 1
Location: RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia Drive Apt 911
December 20th, 2007, 09:33 PM
I should be able to sell some weapons here. I got two slightly used particle disrupters, it's offworld stuff that I got at the Shag Harbour crash scene in the sixtys hardly got any rust on them neddles on full charge don't use them much anymore, hate to part with them though, they're hard to get nowadays. 251 euros and I'll ship them anywhere in the temporal world.No spiritual deliveries. as is
I should be able to sell some weapons here. I got two slightly used particle disrupters, it's offworld stuff that I got at the Shag Harbour crash scene in the sixtys hardly got any rust on them neddles on full charge don't use them much anymore, hate to part with them though, they're hard to get nowadays. 251 euros and I'll ship them anywhere in the temporal world.No spiritual deliveries. as is
House Member
Posts: 4,518
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
December 20th, 2007, 09:33 PM
For some reason, this did not post the first time. Here we go again ............
Bhutto: Spies Meddling in Pakistan Vote
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j...5RXzgD8TL74UO1
``Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto accused Pakistan's military intelligence Thursday of pressuring candidates from her party to drop out of next month's parliamentary elections and urged officials to crack down on such harassment.Bhutto, a two-time former prime minister who recently returned from years of living in exile, told reporters during a campaign stop her party has evidence of interference ...``
YUP --- TIME TO INVADE PAKISTAN!!
For some reason, this did not post the first time. Here we go again ............
Bhutto: Spies Meddling in Pakistan Vote
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j...5RXzgD8TL74UO1
``Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto accused Pakistan's military intelligence Thursday of pressuring candidates from her party to drop out of next month's parliamentary elections and urged officials to crack down on such harassment.Bhutto, a two-time former prime minister who recently returned from years of living in exile, told reporters during a campaign stop her party has evidence of interference ...``
YUP --- TIME TO INVADE PAKISTAN!!
House Member
Posts: 3,096
December 21st, 2007, 11:50 AM
Because the opposition who was booted out of power by the people due to electoral fraud and embezzlement claims they have proof of fraud , which they don't show others.
Face it, Its not the same, no matter how you try and spin it.
Its so easy to frustrate you anti-americans. Don't get me wrong, I have many anti-american thoughts, but those are based on real legitimate greviences. Left to your own devices you'd blame the salt contaminating the oceans as an american conspiracy to lessen the amount of fresh water available to the worlds poor.
Why does that bother me? Because your nutball conspiracies drown out any real issues under a spam of unpractical and often inane insults and theories. Any rational common middle ground is drowned under your extremist rheotoric, meaning the only thing heard is extremists (or freshly created ones) railing against each other.
Because the opposition who was booted out of power by the people due to electoral fraud and embezzlement claims they have proof of fraud , which they don't show others.
Face it, Its not the same, no matter how you try and spin it.
Its so easy to frustrate you anti-americans. Don't get me wrong, I have many anti-american thoughts, but those are based on real legitimate greviences. Left to your own devices you'd blame the salt contaminating the oceans as an american conspiracy to lessen the amount of fresh water available to the worlds poor.
Why does that bother me? Because your nutball conspiracies drown out any real issues under a spam of unpractical and often inane insults and theories. Any rational common middle ground is drowned under your extremist rheotoric, meaning the only thing heard is extremists (or freshly created ones) railing against each other.
House Member
Posts: 4,518
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
Location: Minnesota: Gopher State
December 22nd, 2007, 10:29 PM
``` The science of election-rigging in Pakistan```
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20071221.PAKISTAN21/TPStory/TPInternational/Asia/
quote:
```Election-rigging in Pakistan is a sophisticated science, encompassing the pre-poll phase, polling day and even the period immediately following the election, where practices like blackmail, kidnapping and stuffing of ballot boxes have been documented in past elections by international observers. Opponents are "persuaded" to drop out of the race or change sides, often by employees of the intelligence agencies.```
So when are this forum's right wingers going to demand that Bush invade Pakistan, kill off Musharraf, and to restore democracy there???
``` The science of election-rigging in Pakistan```
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20071221.PAKISTAN21/TPStory/TPInternational/Asia/
quote:
```Election-rigging in Pakistan is a sophisticated science, encompassing the pre-poll phase, polling day and even the period immediately following the election, where practices like blackmail, kidnapping and stuffing of ballot boxes have been documented in past elections by international observers. Opponents are "persuaded" to drop out of the race or change sides, often by employees of the intelligence agencies.```
So when are this forum's right wingers going to demand that Bush invade Pakistan, kill off Musharraf, and to restore democracy there???
