American flees to Canada claiming persecution because of hacker connections

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
An American man wanted on child-pornography charges in Tennessee fled to Canada earlier this year with his parents and sought refugee protection, claiming that he faces the possibility of persecution back home because of his affiliation with the online hacking group Anonymous.

Matthew Paul DeHart, 29, says the child-porn charges are a sham, and that the real reason the U.S. government is after him is to retrieve sensitive national security documents he was privy to.

The bizarre details are contained in a just-released Federal Court of Canada ruling upholding an immigration decision to release him from custody while he awaits a decision on his admissibility to the country.

DeHart, who is from Newburgh, Ind., was indicted by a grand jury in Tennessee in October 2010 on charges of production and transportation of child pornography.

According to a criminal complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Nashville, DeHart met two teenage boys in Franklin, Tenn., through an online game, World of Warcraft.

The complaint, written by an Internet-crimes investigator with the Franklin Police Department, alleges that DeHart posed as a teenage girl to get the boys to send pornographic images of themselves.
The charges have not been proven in court.

In May 2012, DeHart was allowed to be released from custody in Tennessee while awaiting trial. He subsequently fled to Canada with his parents in April of this year and a bench warrant was issued for his arrest.

According to Canadian federal court documents, DeHart claims to be a member of the online hacking collective known as Anonymous and had access to what he believed to be a leaked U.S. government document related to national security.

He claims that the child pornography investigation is a “cover” for the U.S. government’s attempts to retrieve this document and investigate him for espionage, according to the court documents.
It is unclear what the document contains.

DeHart is seeking refugee protection in Canada on the basis he fears persecution if returned to the U.S. He alleges that while in custody in the U.S., he was “drugged, subjected to psychological torture and questioned by FBI agents” in relation to national security. His parents have also filed for refugee protection.

DeHart had been in the custody of Canadian authorities since April on the grounds that he posed a danger to the public and was a flight risk.

But on Aug. 7, an Immigration and Refugee Board adjudicator granted DeHart’s release after his parents posted a $10,000 bond and DeHart agreed to be under house arrest around the clock, while being monitored with a GPS device. He also agreed not to access the Internet.

Last week, a federal judge upheld the immigration adjudicator’s decision to release DeHart in response to a request from the federal public safety minister for a judicial review.

DeHart’s Toronto-based immigration lawyer Lily Tekle said Wednesday that her client wished to say that most of the evidence collected by investigators in the U.S. is under seal and that what has been publicly released does not give the full picture.


more


American seeks refuge in Canada claiming persecution because of hacker connections
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,646
7,103
113
Washington DC
I think Canada owes it to this upstanding bastion of freedom to protect him from the evil war criminals of America and give him all the kiddie porn he wants.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Looks like someone got busted! No wonder why he fled to Canada... he needs a fresh start after that. He's finished here.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,646
7,103
113
Washington DC
Yep, us war criminals are pretty harsh on child molesters. . . er, Sooper Seekrit Anonymous Members with Top-Seekrit Gummint Dockuhmets.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
He absolutely knew that defense wasn't going to fly.

So lets see what Canada does with the pervert.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
I think Canada owes it to this upstanding bastion of freedom to protect him from the evil war criminals of America and give him all the kiddie porn he wants.

Looks like someone got busted! No wonder why he fled to Canada... he needs a fresh start after that. He's finished here.

Yep, us war criminals are pretty harsh on child molesters. . . er, Sooper Seekrit Anonymous Members with Top-Seekrit Gummint Dockuhmets.

He absolutely knew that defense wasn't going to fly.

So lets see what Canada does with the pervert.

So glad to see 'innocent until proven guilty' is still alive and well in America......Wait....you guys gave up your constitution in favor of the Patriot Act....please continue to persecute him. :roll:
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,646
7,103
113
Washington DC
So glad to see 'innocent until proven guilty' is still alive and well in America......Wait....you guys gave up your constitution in favor of the Patriot Act....please continue to persecute him. :roll:
So glad to see you can't figure out the difference between a court of law and two guys chatting on an internet board.

Or did you really think Constitutional due process applies to conversations between private parties?

And while we're at it, do you think "innocent until proven guilty" is in the Constitution?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
So glad to see 'innocent until proven guilty' is still alive and well in America......Wait....you guys gave up your constitution in favor of the Patriot Act....please continue to persecute him. :roll:

Whoa whoa!

Him jetting to Canada IMO says A LOT!

Nobody said he wouldn't have a fair trial. But he's not sticking around to wait for that is he now?

So tell me Nick... do you REALLY believe the CIA set him up because he hacks?
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
So glad to see you can't figure out the difference between a court of law and two guys chatting on an internet board.

Or did you really think Constitutional due process applies to conversations between private parties?

And while we're at it, do you think "innocent until proven guilty" is in the Constitution?
Let's just say it's a good thing you aren't part of his jury because you have convicted him without any evidence other than a media release. :roll:

Whoa whoa!

Him jetting to Canada IMO says A LOT!

Nobody said he wouldn't have a fair trial. But he's not sticking around to wait for that is he now?

So tell me Nick... do you REALLY believe the CIA set him up because he hacks?
I believe anything is possible from the US govt and it's agencies these days and the Homeland Security using false charges to imprison and discredit him is well within the realm of possibility. I'm not saying they did or didn't, I'm just saying it is far more plausible than you want to believe.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,409
11,455
113
Low Earth Orbit
This jackass isn't part of Anonymous. Somebody from Anonymous would know damn well that CBSA and DHS are pretty much integrated since 2011 under "The Beyond The Border Action Plan" as a further extension of the SPP signed a long time ago.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,646
7,103
113
Washington DC
Let's just say it's a good thing you aren't part of his jury because you have convicted him without any evidence other than a media release. :roll:
Nice climbdown from your Constitutional claims.


I believe anything is possible from the US govt and it's agencies these days and the Homeland Security using false charges to imprison and discredit him is well within the realm of possibility. I'm not saying they did or didn't, I'm just saying it is far more plausible than you want to believe.
Well, feel free to grant him asylum. We don't want him.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
I believe anything is possible from the US govt and it's agencies these days and the Homeland Security using false charges to imprison and discredit him is well within the realm of possibility. I'm not saying they did or didn't, I'm just saying it is far more plausible than you want to believe.

Well keep him then. I hope Canada does. He's your guest now. Give him (and his mom and dad) a home, money, food etc.

Maybe Canada's acceptance of him will send a message to all men in the US who get caught with this stuff on their computers. That Canada believes them and there is a safe home there for all of them.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,409
11,455
113
Low Earth Orbit
Child porn is a feasible frame up for somebody who'd probably be able to prove he's coke free and a virgin. No hookers and cocaine set up like more high profile people.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Well keep him then. I hope Canada does. He's your guest now. Give him (and his mom and dad) a home, money, food etc.

Maybe Canada's acceptance of him will send a message to all men in the US who get caught with this stuff on their computers. That Canada believes them and there is a safe home there for all of them.

Not really, we prosecute our citizens for sex tourism and kiddie porn. Although I don't agree with the tourism thing because we are prosecuting for events outside our jurisdiction. Not saying I like the fact people got to Thailand to find 13 year old prostitutes but I would rather see them extradited to Thailand to face charges than prosecuted here for offences in another sovereign nation.
 

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
I think Canada owes it to this upstanding bastion of freedom to protect him from the evil war criminals of America and give him all the kiddie porn he wants.

Going straight to the gutter and accusing somebody of sexual misconduct is pretty standard conduct for America. I would tend to accept his testimony for the limited purposes of that application. That doesn't mean the man isn't also a porn collector, but when dealing with a witness (US authorities in this case) with a known national propensity for a particular modus operandi (tossing in sexual allegations right off the bat to poison the waters) it is not unreasonable to weigh in favour of accepting such a position by the accused. Remember, this isn't a final decision, merely a pre-trial motion on whether than man should be released. The issue in such an application is whether the accused is a flight risk or will attempt to harass witnesses, not whether he is guilty as charged. Presumably the court looked at whether he was a flight risk and decided he was not. The application looks like a US attempt to jail the guy before he is found guilty - typical American version of liberty and freedom from the land of elected judges and free enterprise prisons.

Let's just say it's a good thing you aren't part of his jury because you have convicted him without any evidence other than a media release. :roll:

I believe anything is possible from the US govt and it's agencies these days and the Homeland Security using false charges to imprison and discredit him is well within the realm of possibility. I'm not saying they did or didn't, I'm just saying it is far more plausible than you want to believe.

Well said.

Not really, we prosecute our citizens for sex tourism and kiddie porn. Although I don't agree with the tourism thing because we are prosecuting for events outside our jurisdiction. Not saying I like the fact people got to Thailand to find 13 year old prostitutes but I would rather see them extradited to Thailand to face charges than prosecuted here for offences in another sovereign nation.

There is a section in the Criminal Code that prohibits leaving Canada for the purpose of doing something abroad that is a crime in Canada. In other words his offence relates to what he did in Canada. Intent is often the subject of criminal prohibition.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,646
7,103
113
Washington DC
Going straight to the gutter and accusing somebody of sexual misconduct is pretty standard conduct for America. I would tend to accept his testimony for the limited purposes of that application.
Of course you would. You think the U.S. consists of war criminals and legitimate targets. Which was this guy, and has it changed now that he's in Canada?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
Hey so far it seems like Canada will be a safe place for all men caught up in this.

I hope the word gets out to all of them.

Canada believes you were framed... go to Canada. As soon as you post bail head north and just say the US Govt. framed you.