Harper Government Muzzling Scientists

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83



Muzzling scientists wrong


Taxpayers paid for Kristi Miller's important research on why West Coast salmon stocks have been crashing. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans, for which she works, wanted the information made public. There is great public concern about the future of salmon.

And when Science, a leading research journal, published the findings in January, it notified 7,400 journalists worldwide and advised them how to seek interviews with Miller, who leads a $6-million salmon-genetics project at the federal Pacific Biological Station in Nanaimo.

Then the Privy Council Office in Ottawa - the top bureaucrats - stepped in and muzzled Miller, Postmedia News reported this week. She was ordered not to talk to journalists or speak publicly about her team's research.

Those in control in Ottawa also ordered the Fisheries Department not to issue a news release about the study, saying that it "was not very good, focused on salmon dying and not on the new science aspect." (The research identified a genetic marker associated with increased death rates for Fraser sockeye and "raises the possibility" that a viral infection might be to blame.)

The gag order remains in effect more than six months later.

The official excuse, that Miller must be silenced because the Cohen Commission is examining Fraser River sockeye declines, is transparently stupid. Scientists' public discussion of their work won't affect a judicial inquiry. In any case, Miller is expected to testify next month.

And the silencing fits with a Harper government pattern of muzzling scientists previously able to speak freely about their work. Scientists are now required to obtain permission from political staffers before speaking. If they are allowed to speak, they must stick to "media lines" approved by strategists and ministers' aides. The result has been a great reduction in public information from federally employed scientists researching climate change, food safety, fisheries and other issues.

The public is best served by a free flow of such information. The government's attempt to silence scientists suggests it is not interested in allowing the facts to get in the way of its ideology in making decisions.
 
Last edited:

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
If she was working for the gov't, then unless she signed agreements to the contrary, the gov't owns her work and controls her ability to speak publicly about her findings. I don't necessarily advocate "muzzling scientists" but part of accepting funding or working for an organization is that you live by at least some (if not all) the conditions they place upon you. Sometimes that means abiding by non-disclosure agreements that you may not always agree with, but in the end, it is your decision to work for the organization.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
If she was working for the gov't, then unless she signed agreements to the contrary, the gov't owns her work and controls her ability to speak publicly about her findings.

Who is the government accountable to? All research funded by public money should be open source, including both the published papers and the expert opinions, as a condition of the grant. We are paying them, not the MP's or Privy Council. The research they produce is for Canadian benefit.

This research was truly groundbreaking. Epidemiologists will be scurrying now to figure out what pathogen is involved. Papers will be published. More than that, if it is a virus then that changes management strategies wildly. Why pour resources into strategies which will have very little fruitful gains?
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
140
63
Backwater, Ontario.
Probably all them scientits didn't go to church last week. Goodbye funding, says Fundie.

Heck it's only VIRUSESSS, AN FISH, EH. Who needs research when Stevo has his hand firmly on the Dutch Tiller or somesuch.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,346
557
113
59
Alberta
Probably all them scientits didn't go to church last week. Goodbye funding, says Fundie.

Heck it's only VIRUSESSS, AN FISH, EH. Who needs research when Stevo has his hand firmly on the Dutch Tiller or somesuch.

Man, you are one angry left wing zealot.:lol:
 

relic

Council Member
Nov 29, 2009
1,408
3
38
Nova Scotia
Steve doesn't believe in science,he believes in power for him and his.I used to be apolitical ,now I think you righties are fn retarded,the kind of folks that would cut off your nose to spite your face.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Another good article on the subject here, from the publishers of Dr. Miller's research:
Canadian Fish Scientist 'Muzzled' by Government - ScienceInsider
A scientific study of fish genes has turned a spotlight on a lesser-known facet of the Canadian government: rigid control over its scientists' contact with the media. In an article published online yesterday, Postmedia News reporter Margaret Munro reported that fish scientist Kristi Miller had been forbidden by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) to talk with the media about her genomic analysis of sockeye salmon. The story, based on 792 pages of e-mail and memos that Munro requested under the country's Access to Information Act, has left Canadian science writers fuming about what they call the latest of many examples of unwarranted muzzling.

Miller's paper, which was published in Science in January, is part of an effort to discover why sockeye in the Fraser River in western Canada began dying in record numbers in 2007. It's a contentious and highly political topic in British Columbia, enmeshed in larger debates over the rights of commercial fisheries versus indigenous peoples and whether salmon farms might be in some way responsible for the die-off that threatens to wipe out the $1 billion industry. The reason for the decline is unknown, but Miller's tour-de-force genomic study identified a set of genes expressed at unusual levels in the diseased salmon: genes associated with fighting infection or leukemia. Perhaps, the authors concluded, the mysterious death was due to "a virus infecting fish before river entry and that persists to the spawning areas."

The article impressed other scientists, and media outlets deluged Miller and DFO media officer Diane Lake with requests for interviews, Munro's article says. Like scientists in most government agencies in Canada, Miller must get clearance from her agency's media office before talking with reporters. This time, DFO said no. The reason: Miller's position as an expert for the Cohen Commission, a task force set up by the Prime Minister in 2009 to investigate the cause of the salmon death. According to Munro's article, Miller will be testifying before the commission in August.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,346
557
113
59
Alberta
Lost the last erection. gotta do something whilst the pension dollars keep flooding in..............right??.....sorry........left.:lol:big fukkin laff back atcha...........

Seriously though, what does Harpers religion have to do with this policy?
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Seriously though, what does Harpers religion have to do with this policy?

Have to agree with RCS. It has nothing to do with Harper's religion. It has all to do with his control freak nature. Scientists will keep to the prescribed talking points, as directed by the Ministry of Truth...errrr Prime Minister's Office rather. That is when they are allowed to speak.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,346
557
113
59
Alberta
Have to agree with RCS. It has nothing to do with Harper's religion. It has all to do with his control freak nature. Scientists will keep to the prescribed talking points, as directed by the Ministry of Truth...errrr Prime Minister's Office rather. That is when they are allowed to speak.

Valid argument Tonington and I am not here to disagree with you. When the discussuon or debate is made on that level it is all the more enthralling and certainly more credible.
 

jjaycee98

Electoral Member
Jan 27, 2006
421
4
18
British Columbia
If she was working for the gov't, then unless she signed agreements to the contrary, the gov't owns her work and controls her ability to speak publicly about her findings. I don't necessarily advocate "muzzling scientists" but part of accepting funding or working for an organization is that you live by at least some (if not all) the conditions they place upon you. Sometimes that means abiding by non-disclosure agreements that you may not always agree with, but in the end, it is your decision to work for the organization.

Perhaps they think their "employee" came up with totally wrong conclusions and don't wish to be embarrassed by what she has to say. Of what use to anyone is wrong information?

In fact there have been record numbers of Salmon every year since 2007. Most scientist believe there had to be an errant gene within the stock and Mother Nature did what she does best. The weaker stock genetic lines died off and the stronger ones prevailed.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Most scientist believe there had to be an errant gene within the stock and Mother Nature did what she does best. The weaker stock genetic lines died off and the stronger ones prevailed.

Most scientists do not believe that, where did you hear that? There is no evidence of that whatsoever. As well, there's well over 100 different stocks of Fraser River Sockeye, an errant deleterious gene making it into all distinct breeding populations simultaneously is highly unlikely.
 

Nuggler

kind and gentle
Feb 27, 2006
11,596
140
63
Backwater, Ontario.
My comments re: religion were just to demonstrate in a humorous way, the control freak Herr Harpo is.

Come on!! You knew that, eh.

Google "Dutch Tiller" and see what else he might like to control. That too is meant to be humorous, and in no way impinge on the dirty nasty controlling character of Herr Harpo.............und Flatulance.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,665
113
Northern Ontario,
Just a question:
Is it possible that the government wants to control the timing of the release of the documents???

eg; when the Ontario government does a geological survey...the results of the survey is only released on a prearranged date so as not to give any mining company unfair advantage in staking claims....
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Just a question:
Is it possible that the government wants to control the timing of the release of the documents???

The paper is already published...they are controlling the media access to the expert. Most probably don't understand the highly technical jargon of a molecular biologist.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,346
557
113
59
Alberta
My comments re: religion were just to demonstrate in a humorous way, the control freak Herr Harpo is.

Come on!! You knew that, eh.

Google "Dutch Tiller" and see what else he might like to control. That too is meant to be humorous, and in no way impinge on the dirty nasty controlling character of Herr Harpo.............und Flatulance.

No they weren't. That's how folks like you roll. When you disagree with someones ideology you go for the lowest common denominator in the argument. In Harpers case its the fact that he is a Christian. Now if you were to attack a politician in this manner who was a Hindu or a Muslim (which I am guessing you wouldn't dare) you would be branded intolerant or even racist.

The fact that Harper has yet to use his Christian religion in governing matters not to you, because with Christians intolerance is quite acceptable because they generally don't haul you int of an HRC or throw out the intolerance card.

That's the awesome double standard.

Same thing with the Nazi comment.

When you sink to this level in the debate you look like the other kind of zealot. The uneducated ignoramus who can't muster an argument so instead calls people Nazi's or Bible Thumpers.

As I said before you look like an angry zealot who brings nothing to the table but intolerance and ignorance.

But don't take me seriously, I'm just injecting a bit of humor to spice up your Dutch Tiller comment. :)