9/11, an inside job?

EagleSmack
+1
#271
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post


Shirley Bear you can see that the article was already reduced to layman's terms.

.

Don't call him Shirley.

What are your version of events please?
 
petros
Avatar
+1
#272
Quote:

I'm sure you have the number of times a beam that size has to be bent back and forth before it melted.

You'll never "melt" any metal by bending. You'll only weaken the layered crystal lattice.
 
MHz
#273
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

You'll never "melt" any metal by bending. You'll only weaken the layered crystal lattice.

Something caused a whole lot of heat in all 3 buildings
--

Quote: Originally Posted by EagleSmackView Post

What are your version of events please?

My version is the same as where it left off, nothing I have come across disputes these claims about WTC7.
--
 
petros
Avatar
+1
#274
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Something caused a whole lot of heat in all 3 buildings
--

Somebody forgot to unplug the popcorn maker in the mini mall in the subway station.
 
CDNBear
Avatar
#275
Quote: Originally Posted by AnnaGView Post

I read that. I know WTC 7 collapsed and I never believed the conspiracy version that says stuff like "controlled demo caused it". But that link does not say how "falling debris" from the towers managed to land waaaay over on WTC7. The fires that caused WTC 7's collapse must have come from somewhere.

It shows pictures of huge pieces of the perimeter of WTC 1 sitting on the road at the base of WTC 7. It also has pic's of the damage to the roof of WTC' 5 and 6.

Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

I'm sure you have the number of times a beam that size has to be bent back and forth before it melted.

Nope, because it's never happened to my knowledge.

Quote:

Shirley Bear you can see that the article was already reduced to layman's terms.

So in other words you can't. Thanx again for showing you don't understand 99.99999% of what you post.
"other silly crap" Like bending steel back and forth till it melts?

Quote:

The link to the observations of molten metal in the bottom of the elevator shaft.

What about it?
 
AnnaG
Avatar
+1
#276
Quote: Originally Posted by MHzView Post

Something caused a whole lot of heat in all 3 buildings

Fire would be my guess.
Quote:

Flame temperatures in room fires
There is fairly broad agreement in the fire science community that flashover is reached when the average upper gas temperature in the room exceeds about 600°C. Prior to that point, no generalizations should be made: There will be zones of 900°C flame temperatures, but wide spatial variations will be seen. Of interest, however, is the peak fire temperature normally associated with room fires. The peak value is governed by ventilation and fuel supply characteristics [12] and so such values will form a wide frequency distribution. Of interest is the maximum value which is fairly regularly found. This value turns out to be around 1200°C, although a typical post-flashover room fire will more commonly be 900~1000°C. The time-temperature curve for the standard fire endurance test, ASTM E 119 [13] goes up to 1260°C, but this is reached only in 8 hr. In actual fact, no jurisdiction demands fire endurance periods for over 4 hr, at which point the curve only reaches 1093°C. The peak expected temperatures in room fires, then, are slightly greater than those found in free-burning fire plumes. This is to be expected. The amount that the fire plume's temperature drops below the adiabatic flame temperature is determined by the heat losses from the flame. When a flame is far away from any walls and does not heat up the enclosure, it radiates to surroundings which are...

Quote has been trimmed
from --

--Here's some persistent heat for you: --

But I think New Scientist provides a pretty good description:

--



Quote:

My version is the same as where it left off, nothing I have come across disputes these claims about WTC7.
--

... or at least not that you can understand or acknowledge anyway.

Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

It shows pictures of huge pieces of the perimeter of WTC 1 sitting on the road at the base of WTC 7. It also has pic's of the damage to the roof of WTC' 5 and 6.

Yeah. I guess crap can travel a football field length and through another building to land on and near 7.
 
CDNBear
Avatar
#277
Quote: Originally Posted by AnnaGView Post


Yeah. I guess crap can travel a football field length and through another building to land on and near 7.

Yep. Which is why there is photographs of that debris.

Don't forget how tall WTC 1 was.
 
AnnaG
Avatar
#278
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

Yep. Which is why there is photographs of that debris.

Don't forget how tall WTC 1 was.

Yeah I know. It'd be nice if there was a vid of it though. Downward velocity does not pitch stuff horizontally. I can't see it rolling far after most of 1 was in a heap either. Unless the plane knocked a big wad of it off when it hit.......
 
CDNBear
Avatar
#279
Quote: Originally Posted by AnnaGView Post

Yeah I know. It'd be nice if there was a vid of it though. Downward velocity does not pitch stuff horizontally. I can't see it rolling far after most of 1 was in a heap either. Unless the plane knocked a big wad of it off when it hit.......

Nah, because of the design of the buildings, it peeled like a banana and just fell right over from way on up.

In a lot of the pics, you can see it lying on WTC 5 to.
 
AnnaG
Avatar
#280
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

Nah, because of the design of the buildings, it peeled like a banana and just fell right over from way on up.

In a lot of the pics, you can see it lying on WTC 5 to.

Ok.
Maybe I can find something else to throw doubt on Junior Dumbya & Co.'s explanation then.
 
petros
#281
Quote: Originally Posted by AnnaGView Post

Ok.
Maybe I can find something else to throw doubt on Junior Dumbya & Co.'s explanation then.

That fact that it is Junior Dumbya & Co.'s explanation is suspect enough.
 
AnnaG
Avatar
#282
Quote: Originally Posted by petrosView Post

That fact that it is Junior Dumbya & Co.'s explanation is suspect enough.

lol Well, technically it is FEMA's explanation but FEMA was under Junior Dumbya & Co.'s admin at the time.
 

Similar Threads

7
Prison for inside trader
by JLM | Jan 9th, 2010
89
Iran outside and inside
by jimmoyer | Jul 11th, 2008
2
Inside 9/11
by Johnny Utah | Sep 11th, 2007
0
Video 9/11 Inside Job
by jjw1965 | Sep 12th, 2005
no new posts