#31
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Mar 31st, 2011
What is it with religous people.
Tell me ean, if Mercury is cool in the middle how does it have a magnetic field?
Tell me ean, if Mercury is cool in the middle how does it have a magnetic field?
The Doomed Mercury
#32
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Mar 31st, 2011Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter Sinister
True, but hardly to the point, eanassir believes Mercury and Venus were once inhabited by humans. Funny how he can believe that the trees burned there, but the towns, houses, clubs, shops, and furniture survived. They must all have been made of rock. I'm getting a vision of a Bedrock-type village, Fred, Wilma, Barney, Betty, et al, fried to a crisp in their yards, leaving a ghost town of stone buildings...
This is what really happens to Mormons. Instead of being whisked away to be gods on other planets their spirits are absorbed by the Great Salt Lake where they are doomed live in the after life as artemia salina building castles in fish bowls while Christian families observe as gods in their own right?
#33
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter Sinister
#3 The fissures, grooves and huge trenches that appear on the surface of Mercury, Moon and Earth are certainly due to the cooling of these subjects which contracted to varying degrees. Certainly, these objects are cooler than they were in the past. #3 is not the correct explanation.
Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter Sinister
It is easier to watch Mercury: now you see Mercury and see many features on its surface like the Debussy Crater, -- on Mercury; therefore when you see it become in the dark night of Mercury -- then tell me.Also, neither Mercury nor Venus have stopped their axial rotation,
Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter Sinister
How can you scientifically insist on this? While they only try hard to find the truth about Mercury, and you come and insist there was no life on either of Mercury and Venus ?and neither were they ever inhabited.
#34
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011
So any hoot, will we survive this event and HOW?
Why do the planets have axial rotation at all?
Can anyone explain gravity?
What is the cause of time dilation?
Will the Great Salt Lake Mormons be aware of their Christian God families? and will the Christian parents let their children play with the Mormons unattended?
And did the Flint Stone's automatic dishwasher survive, considering that it is merely an appliance?
And honestly, is it reasonable to conclude that neither Mercury or Venus were ever inhabited?
I think NOT..
Why do the planets have axial rotation at all?
Can anyone explain gravity?
What is the cause of time dilation?
Will the Great Salt Lake Mormons be aware of their Christian God families? and will the Christian parents let their children play with the Mormons unattended?
And did the Flint Stone's automatic dishwasher survive, considering that it is merely an appliance?
And honestly, is it reasonable to conclude that neither Mercury or Venus were ever inhabited?
I think NOT..
Last edited by TheGuy; Apr 1st, 2011 at 03:42 AM..
#35
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011
It is time now to see Mercury in another view point
Better they should not stick to their rigid opinions and explanations of the strange findings they see about Mercury.
--
Therefore, they observed the strange movement of Mercury: its year, its day, its orbit --> but were wrong in their explanation: because they are unaware of the fact that Mercury has stopped its axial rotation: keeping the same face towards the sun, and its core became colder by time and the planets shrank; its gravity about lost or weakened, and its atmosphere is lost into the outer space.
And now Venus is following in its footsteps, and the turn will be for Earth to become like Venus in the future.
Mercury stopped since long time ago.
Venus stopped.
Then Earth will stop 1000 years after the stopping of Venus from its axial rotation.
--
Better they should not stick to their rigid opinions and explanations of the strange findings they see about Mercury.
--
- "Since it is closer to the Sun than the Earth, the illumination of Mercury's disk varies when viewed with a telescope from our perspective."
- The contraction and shrinkage of the surface of Mercury:
- "Temperature variations on Mercury are the most extreme in the solar system ranging from 90 K to 700 K."
- "The temperature on -- is slightly hotter but very stable."
Therefore, they observed the strange movement of Mercury: its year, its day, its orbit --> but were wrong in their explanation: because they are unaware of the fact that Mercury has stopped its axial rotation: keeping the same face towards the sun, and its core became colder by time and the planets shrank; its gravity about lost or weakened, and its atmosphere is lost into the outer space.
And now Venus is following in its footsteps, and the turn will be for Earth to become like Venus in the future.
Mercury stopped since long time ago.
Venus stopped.
Then Earth will stop 1000 years after the stopping of Venus from its axial rotation.
--
#36
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011
Is it possible to enhance the mind with technology?
Is it possible to transfer the mind into a computer of some sort?
Are we not machines made matter and energy, that empower the mind experience TRUTH?
Is it possible to transfer the mind into a computer of some sort?
Are we not machines made matter and energy, that empower the mind experience TRUTH?
#37
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011Quote: Originally Posted by TheGuy
Is it possible to enhance the mind with technology?
Is it possible to transfer the mind into a computer of some sort?
Are we not machines made matter and energy, that empower the mind experience TRUTH?
Ask yourself why don't you consider the subject and see it is a reasonable idea?
--
--
#38
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011
Because your talking about things that you simply have no way of KNOWING if they are TRUE or NOT...
It is "reasonable" to consider ONLY what is KNOWN, and not take part in idle specutlation about things you simply don't know..
It is reasoning to decern what is KNOWN from what is UNKNOWN..
You do not need to say anything crazy or presumptuous to be persecuted..
That is just stupid, and you deserve what you get..
All you have to do is state the actual plain and simple observable facts of life, and people freak out and call you every name in the book.. It's really quite remarkable.
re_mark_able
The difference between the religious and the none believers is this..
The religious are dogmatic and think they have all the answers..
The none believes are nihilists and think that answers are impossible, and that they can just choose to believe whatever the F*** they want..
It's like this..
Galileo was an astronomer and mathematician, born in Pisa, Italy. He entered Pisa University as a medical student in 1581, and became professor of mathematics at Padua (1592--1610), where he improved the refracting telescope (1610), and was the first to use it for astronomy.
His bold advocacy of the Copernican theory brought severe ecclesiastical censure. He was forced to retract before the Inquisition, and was sentenced to indefinite imprisonment - though the sentence was commuted by the pope, at the request of the Duke of Tuscany. Under house arrest in Florence, he continued his research, though by 1637 he had become totally blind.
Among his other discoveries were the law of uniformly accelerated motion towards the Earth, the parabolic path of projectiles, and the law that all bodies have weight.
His work was finally removed from the Inquisiton's banned book list in 1954. The validity of his scientific work was formally recognized by the Roman Catholic Church in 1993.
Things haven't changed....
It is "reasonable" to consider ONLY what is KNOWN, and not take part in idle specutlation about things you simply don't know..
It is reasoning to decern what is KNOWN from what is UNKNOWN..
You do not need to say anything crazy or presumptuous to be persecuted..
That is just stupid, and you deserve what you get..
All you have to do is state the actual plain and simple observable facts of life, and people freak out and call you every name in the book.. It's really quite remarkable.
re_mark_able
The difference between the religious and the none believers is this..
The religious are dogmatic and think they have all the answers..
The none believes are nihilists and think that answers are impossible, and that they can just choose to believe whatever the F*** they want..
It's like this..
Galileo was an astronomer and mathematician, born in Pisa, Italy. He entered Pisa University as a medical student in 1581, and became professor of mathematics at Padua (1592--1610), where he improved the refracting telescope (1610), and was the first to use it for astronomy.
His bold advocacy of the Copernican theory brought severe ecclesiastical censure. He was forced to retract before the Inquisition, and was sentenced to indefinite imprisonment - though the sentence was commuted by the pope, at the request of the Duke of Tuscany. Under house arrest in Florence, he continued his research, though by 1637 he had become totally blind.
Among his other discoveries were the law of uniformly accelerated motion towards the Earth, the parabolic path of projectiles, and the law that all bodies have weight.
His work was finally removed from the Inquisiton's banned book list in 1954. The validity of his scientific work was formally recognized by the Roman Catholic Church in 1993.
Things haven't changed....
Last edited by TheGuy; Apr 1st, 2011 at 04:28 AM..
#39
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011Quote: Originally Posted by eanassir
You're utterly hopeless eanassir. The link you provided about Mercury in that post clearly and succinctly states otherwise. From the site: " It is now known that Mercury rotates three times in two of its years." It is time now to see Mercury in another view point
... Mercury stopped since long time ago.
Do you not read the material at the links you post, or do you just ignore the facts that are inconsistent with your silly thesis?
#40
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter Sinister
You're utterly hopeless eanassir. The link you provided about Mercury in that post clearly and succinctly states otherwise. From the site: " It is now known that Mercury rotates three times in two of its years."
Do you not read the material at the links you post, or do you just ignore the facts that are inconsistent with your silly thesis?
So why to planets spin?
#41
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011Quote: Originally Posted by TheGuy
...so we don't have to....So why to planets spin?
#42
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011Quote: Originally Posted by TheGuy
Google is your friend. So why to planets spin?
--
#44
Re: The Doomed Mercury
Apr 1st, 2011Quote: Originally Posted by TheGuy
This is not the correct thing. I tell you how:Because your talking about things that you simply have no way of KNOWING if they are TRUE or NOT...
It is "reasonable" to consider ONLY what is KNOWN, and not take part in idle specutlation about things you simply don't know..
It is reasoning to decern what is KNOWN from what is UNKNOWN..
If it is "no way of knowing it is true or not" as you said, then why don't you put it as a possibility instead of rejecting the whole subject?
And I tell you what is KNOWN now, is not essentially true, particularly when they are trying to find answers of things they admit are obscure and in fact UNKNOWN to them.
Quote: Originally Posted by TheGuy
Not every religion ... The true religion of God is not like this; in the Quran God - be glorifed - urged people to think and investigate and not to take things without thinking and contemplation especially the traditions of people which they adopt blindly.The difference between the religious and the none believers is this..
The religious are dogmatic and think they have all the answers..
The none believes are nihilists and think that answers are impossible, and that they can just choose to believe whatever the F*** they want..
It's like this..Galileo ,,,
And you take Galileo as an example; see this in the next paragraph
Quote: Originally Posted by TheGuy
Galileo was an astronomer and mathematician, born in Pisa, Italy. He entered Pisa University as a medical student in 1581, and became professor of mathematics at Padua (1592--1610), where he improved the refracting telescope (1610), and was the first to use it for astronomy.
Quote: Originally Posted by TheGuy
Galileo as an exampleHis bold advocacy of the Copernican theory brought severe ecclesiastical censure. He was forced to retract before the Inquisition, and was sentenced to indefinite imprisonment - though the sentence was commuted by the pope, at the request of the Duke of Tuscany. Under house arrest in Florence, he continued his research, though by 1637 he had become totally blind.
Among his other discoveries were the law of uniformly accelerated motion towards the Earth, the parabolic path of projectiles, and the law that all bodies have weight.
His work was finally removed from the Inquisiton's banned book list in 1954. The validity of his scientific work was formally recognized by the Roman Catholic Church in 1993.
Things haven't changed....
What is the danger of men like Galileo to the Church that they made the Inquisition!?
And what had Galileo and others to do with the Church, so that they burnt some and imprisoned others?
This had been done after the conquering of the Andalus (Spain now) by the European and their church; so they started to suspect and investigate about every man like Galileo lest he should be importing to them the teachings of the Islam.
=============================================
Quote: Originally Posted by Dexter Sinister
Dexter, By God's grace, I have all the hope; and in fact it is you that are the hopeless.You're utterly hopeless eanassir.
[QUOTE=Dexter Sinister;1402515]The link you provided about Mercury in that post clearly and succinctly states otherwise. From the site: " It is now known that Mercury rotates three times in two of its years."
Do you not read the material at the links you post,/QUOTE]
I read it, but don't you yourself read it carefully:
"Until 1962 it was thought that Mercury's "day" was the same length as its "year" so as to keep that same face to the Sun much as the Moon does to the Earth. But this was shown to be false in 1965 by doppler radar observations. It is now known that Mercury rotates three times in two of its years."
Therefore, in the past they thought its day equals its year, but now they see "it spins three times in two of its years"
So they were wrong (as do they think now), but now they think it another way; why couldn't they be wrong now also?
And you defend everything they say: in the past they said: its day equals its year, and you believed that without hesitation, and now they say it in another way, and you also believe it; how can that be any scientific sense ?
Quote: Originally Posted by TheGuy
--So why to planets spin?
Last edited by eanassir; Apr 1st, 2011 at 02:32 PM..
Similar Threads
57
39
1
1
CCIM © 2012. All rights reserved.
About CC | Contact Us | Terms of Service | Archive | Free Software Downloads
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
About CC | Contact Us | Terms of Service | Archive | Free Software Downloads
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.