Your thoughts on a Federation of the Americas?

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Your thoughts on a Fe

Don't assume too much Martin. I know plenty of people who have been to Mexico. Many are involved in aid agencies or political organisations, and I'm pretty damned sure that both my grandmother and her sister were down there before you, spent more time there, and met more people under more circumstances.

Then there are the people involved in trying to preserve the many types of maize. That's being wiped out because of NAFTA and GM corn flooding in from the US.

It sounds, according to your description, like you know one family in one small area and are taking their word and that experience as gospel. Sorry, my friend, but I'll listen to the views of a group of diverse and educated people who have been travelling there for over fifty years before I listen to a single a person with a single point of view and a perspective limited to some personal experiences.

I am not part of the anti-intellectualism that is so common in this day and age. That anti-intellectualism is very close to thoughtlessness. I do read, that's why we have books, magazines, newspapers and the internet. I do talk to people, that's why we have language. I've done the research, I've talked to the people. To try to denigrate that because you do not understand it doesn't cut it.
 

Martin Le Acadien

Electoral Member
Sep 29, 2004
454
0
16
Province perdue du Canada, Louisian
Re: RE: Your thoughts on a Fe

Reverend Blair said:
Don't assume too much Martin. I know plenty of people who have been to Mexico. Many are involved in aid agencies or political organisations, and I'm pretty damned sure that both my grandmother and her sister were down there before you, spent more time there, and met more people under more circumstances.

Then there are the people involved in trying to preserve the many types of maize. That's being wiped out because of NAFTA and GM corn flooding in from the US.

It sounds, according to your description, like you know one family in one small area and are taking their word and that experience as gospel. Sorry, my friend, but I'll listen to the views of a group of diverse and educated people who have been travelling there for over fifty years before I listen to a single a person with a single point of view and a perspective limited to some personal experiences..



I don't ASS U ME anything, I read your post about not traveling, you on the other hand, better not bet the farm on what others have expeienced based upon what you have been told!

"pretty damned sure that both my grandmother and her sister were down there before you, spent more time there, and met more people under more circumstances."

If you had read an earlier post, my wife's niece married a man from Gadalajara, Jalisco State, (They are ELITES) so I have met people from the top strata of society to the Indian Peasents who make up the bulk of Mexican Society! I don't know you family, so I can only report on what I saw!

I been from Quintana Roo to Baja California del Norte and been in Mexico no less 100 time since the border isn't a far trip for us!

My experiences in Mexico have been long and varied, I know many Mexicans on a Personal Level and have seen their plight first hand!

Reverend Blair said:
I am not part of the anti-intellectualism that is so common in this day and age. That anti-intellectualism is very close to thoughtlessness. I do read, that's why we have books, magazines, newspapers and the internet. I do talk to people, that's why we have language. I've done the research, I've talked to the people. To try to denigrate that because you do not understand it doesn't cut it.

No, your not an anti-intellectual, you are a psuedo-intellectual who has just read or heard somebody elses opinion or statement with out the benefit of experiencing it in the first person! I probably understand more than you can imagine, My work takes me to more countries than I care to visit, see things that should not be and experience first hand the world without rose colored glasses! The world is full of Arm Chair Experts, short on people with hands on experiences!

Tonight, the family went to a French Food Festival and the Politicos were out in force (OPEN CONGRESSIONAL RIDING TYPE ELECTION) and every politico declared NAFTA the SHAFTA for us, but I guess when the payoffs hit the bank, it will be business as usual on Wednesday, Nov 3! So much for BS!
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Your thoughts on a Fe

You don't get off that easy, Martin. You are putting yourself up there as an expert without giving your credentials. That makes your word worth slightly less than than the word of other experts who disagree with you.

Saying that you have been someplace is not the same as saying that you have studied the problems there or talked to a diverse group of people that have been in the area and dealt with those problems firsthand on an ongoing basis.

You say that the schools didn't exist, but my great aunt helped to set some of them up and taught in them. You complain about the lack of facitlites, but she thought those facilities were great. They were better than she had in rural Saskatchewan, after all.

Your assumption that I don't travel is laughable as well. I'm forty years old, something else that is noted on these boards someplace, and haven't been able to travel to your country for less than four years. That's one country for less than one tenth of my life.

Whether one travels or not though, the extensive information available in modern society does make it possible for one to learn what is happening in the world around them. You are just one voice among many and you are contradicting what so many others with at least as much experience as you have points to the fact that what you say is no more gospel, no more informed, than what others say.

I live in one of the most culturally diverse cities in Canada. The province I live in has a large Mennonite community and sees many Mennonite immigrants and temporary workers from Mexico every year. Their families used to be well-off in Mexico, but that has changed drastically over the last few years...since Fox came to power, mostly. In case you haven't checked, Fox is quite conservative and espouses many of the same ideas and ideals that you do.

My grandparents used to spend a lot of time in Guadalajara, back before it was a tourist destination. They travelled all over Mexico from there and, my grandfather being a farmer, they spent a lot of time with the rural people in Mexico.

Now you can sit there and tell me how experienced you are, but you've been dead wrong on some pertinent facts...wages in Mexico, whether schools and healthcare existed, the success of farmers being related to NAFTA, etc.

If all that matters is what you think you've seen with your own eyes then I would suggest that you open your eyes at least enough to realise that a great many people have seen things that contradict what you think you have seen.

You can call me pseudo-intellectual if you like, I really don't care. Don't get your facts wrong and then claim to be an expert though. Experts take the time to actually learn something.
 

Numure

Council Member
Apr 30, 2004
1,063
0
36
Montréal, Québec
RE: Your thoughts on a Fe

Sorry Martin, but I will trust Rev's opinion before yours. Over the the time I've been a member of this community, his opinions arnt half based. Before he reachs an opinion on any given subject, he has researched it, and learned about ti threw various means. He is also capable to change his opinion if proven wrong, or incorrect. Now for that, I've come to trust him on many issues.

But you, seem more emotional in your opinions, less educated and more corrupted by Corporate mass media. With your last posts, another reason for me not to trust your opinion, or by far almost not listen to it. You're incoherent, quite hard to understand and you do not explain your opinion very well. As much as I want to believe you, your proof is less then accurate and your sources... scepticle. Don't take it personnal.
 

Numure

Council Member
Apr 30, 2004
1,063
0
36
Montréal, Québec
Re: RE: Your thoughts on a Federation of the Americas?

Rick van Opbergen said:
Numure that are some pretty tough conclusions about a person you barely know.

I'm talking about the time spent here. We can see and deduct quite alot from our own eyes.
 

Rick van Opbergen

House Member
Sep 16, 2004
4,080
0
36
The Netherlands
www.google.com
"But you, seem more emotional in your opinions, less educated and more corrupted by Corporate mass media." If that is your interpretation of Martin, than I call that some pretty tough conclusions. Martin is has been here for a month, with at least one week not active on canadiancontent.com. He has not participated in many discussions so far. That's why I find your conclusions rather tough. Personally, for me, Martin seems to be opposite, I base that on my conversations I had with him about Acadians and Cajuns, but I know him too little to have a good personal opinion about him.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Your thoughts on a Fe

Umm...this isn't a popularity contest. Don't trust either of our opinions. Go look up the facts, listen to a variety of viewpoints, then form your own opinions. That's kind of my point. The truth is out there.
 

Martin Le Acadien

Electoral Member
Sep 29, 2004
454
0
16
Province perdue du Canada, Louisian
Re: RE: Your thoughts on a Fe

Reverend Blair said:
You don't get off that easy, Martin. You are putting yourself up there as an expert without giving your credentials. That makes your word worth slightly less than than the word of other experts who disagree with you.

Saying that you have been someplace is not the same as saying that you have studied the problems there or talked to a diverse group of people that have been in the area and dealt with those problems firsthand on an ongoing basis.

You say that the schools didn't exist, but my great aunt helped to set some of them up and taught in them. You complain about the lack of facitlites, but she thought those facilities were great. They were better than she had in rural Saskatchewan, after all.

Your assumption that I don't travel is laughable as well. I'm forty years old, something else that is noted on these boards someplace, and haven't been able to travel to your country for less than four years. That's one country for less than one tenth of my life.

Whether one travels or not though, the extensive information available in modern society does make it possible for one to learn what is happening in the world around them. You are just one voice among many and you are contradicting what so many others with at least as much experience as you have points to the fact that what you say is no more gospel, no more informed, than what others say.

I live in one of the most culturally diverse cities in Canada. The province I live in has a large Mennonite community and sees many Mennonite immigrants and temporary workers from Mexico every year. Their families used to be well-off in Mexico, but that has changed drastically over the last few years...since Fox came to power, mostly. In case you haven't checked, Fox is quite conservative and espouses many of the same ideas and ideals that you do.

My grandparents used to spend a lot of time in Guadalajara, back before it was a tourist destination. They travelled all over Mexico from there and, my grandfather being a farmer, they spent a lot of time with the rural people in Mexico.

Now you can sit there and tell me how experienced you are, but you've been dead wrong on some pertinent facts...wages in Mexico, whether schools and healthcare existed, the success of farmers being related to NAFTA, etc.

If all that matters is what you think you've seen with your own eyes then I would suggest that you open your eyes at least enough to realise that a great many people have seen things that contradict what you think you have seen.

You can call me pseudo-intellectual if you like, I really don't care. Don't get your facts wrong and then claim to be an expert though. Experts take the time to actually learn something.

I never called my self an "expert", just a person who has been to Mexico!

The basic message is this:

!. Mexico is a poor country, it has a Rich Class, Poor Class and a small Middle Class, do you agree? Mexico is a country of contrasts unlike the US and Canada, you might see a million dollar resort next to a slum! Canada, Europe and the US are basically First World Countries with good Infastructure!

2. Mexico has an expanding population which accounts for some of the pressures to emigrate, Agree? 72 million, 1990 census.

3. Your Aunt built some schools and taught, that is not unusual, the Catholic Church here in South Louisiana has sponsored several parishes in Mexico, our Sponsored Parish is in Coahila State outside Hermosilla the capital of the State. The Knights of Columbus was declared a "Terrorist Outlaws" in the 1920's because they didn;t let the government oversee their activities! http://www.kofc.org/publications/columbia/detail.cfm?id=3775 The activities of elomasonary groups has been closely watched in Mexico and even today we are low key about our support of the relief activities of the Church! The Rich Landowners are not the least bit happy when you give the poor some help!

4. I would like to know more about the Mennonite Situation in Mexico, I know they have the most prospourous farms in Mexico but the Government has been trying to bring them into the ejido system. We too have Mexician "temporary" workers here too in Louisiana.

5. ejido [Span.,=common land], in Mexico, agricultural land expropriated from large private holdings and redistributed to communal farms. Communal ownership of land had been widely practiced by the Aztecs, but the institution was in decline before the Spanish arrived. The conquistadors instituted the encomienda, which was superseded by the repartimiento and finally, after independence (1821), by debt peonage. Although legally abolished by the constitution of 1917, which provided for the restoration of the ejido, peonage remained a general practice until the presidency of Lázaro Cárdenas. In the Laguna District in 1936, the ejido became fact on a large scale. The intent of the ejido system is to remedy the social injustice of the past and to increase production of subsistence foods. The land is owned by the government, and the ejido is financed by a special national bank which supplies the necessary capital for reclamation, improvement, initial seeding, and so forth. In effect, the bank has replaced the colonial encomendero, with this difference—the laborer is paid on the basis of unit work accomplished.

Since tha land is controlled and owned by the Government, the problem is that if you are not in with the powers to be, your plot can be "appropriated."

6. Corruption is widespread in Mexico and Latin America with the exception of Costa Rica, a very stable and prosperous country, it has no army, only a small National Police Force, a two party system and welcomes investment! Also very protective of its local industries!

The Mordida means:

THE MORDIDA:
MEXICO AND CORRUPTION
By: Christina J. Johns
I spent several years of my life writing a book about law in Ancient Mexico and while I was doing so, traveled widely throughout the country. I spent some more years of my life researching and writing a book about the war on drugs.

So, it was no surprise, when I read last week that an army general who headed Mexico's national drug agency was being detained and awaiting arrest on charges that he accepted huge payments from a Mexican drug baron.

The extent and pervasiveness of official corruption in Mexico is difficult to explain to anyone who hasn't lived there. Corruption is everywhere and widely accepted as a fact of life.

Early on in my travels in Mexico I learned what the word "mordida" meant. Literally, it means "bite" but figuratively and the way it is most frequently used, it means a bribe.

For a lot of things you do in Mexico, especially if they involve a public official, you have to pay the "mordida", the bite.

Want your tourist card stamped? You pay the mordida. Want the dates on your tourist card extended? You pay the mordida. Want your car registered? You pay the mordida.

And, there's no point in protesting it. The question is not whether you'll pay. The question is how much.

During the time I was traveling in Mexico, I was married to a historian. We got so used to paying the "mordida" we worked out a routine which was pretty effective at getting the price down.

Whenever we were going into a situation where we knew we'd be asked to pay, we acted as if I couldn't speak Spanish. The inevitable request for money would be made to my husband, of course, and after a few seconds of feigned shock, he would translate for me.

I would then fly off into a tirade, peppering my shouting with generous repetitions of "No. No, absolutely not. No" which translates into any language.

Tom would shrug and try to look henpecked, and appeal to the official, his palms turned upward toward the heavens in supplication. The official, then, seeing what Tom was faced with, usually lowered the mordida a bit. Tom would translate the new amount and I would respond again with: "No, no, no. We'll go to Tourista (the government tourist office)." This little farce would go on and on and on until the mordida reached an acceptable level and we would pay.

I figured it worked for two reasons. First, they felt sorry for Tom this poor harassed man, cursed with what they saw as an out-of-control wife. Second, after a while, they just wanted to get rid of us because if there is anything a Latin American man hates, it's a highly verbal, angry and yelling gringa woman. I know this, by the way, because it almost got us shot by a police captain in Chiapas, but that's another story.

Our little routine decreased the amount of the mordida, the playacting was fun and it made paying the bribe a little less galling. But, we still had to pay the bribe.

We even had to pay a bribe in Mexico City to get a telephone installed. And, even with the mordida, it took so long to get a listing and a telephone that the Mexico City phone book was widely referred to as the "Book of the Dead."

Like I said, it's difficult to explain the pervasiveness of the corruption in Mexico and the degree to which the population takes it for granted. I'll give you a good example. A lot of people in Mexico just couldn't understand Watergate. We were in Mexico at the time and Mexican friends and colleagues would ask me: What is everybody so upset about? What do they think politicians do but lie and steal and cheat and break the law? That's why they become politicians - so they can lie and steal and cheat and break the law.

You have to admit, it's something to think about.

7. Socialism is and has been a failure in Mexico because when you give a Corrupt Politician control over the means of Production and the MONEY, he just can't help himself! In Europe, Canada and the US we have oversight to some degree, but without the oversight, it becomes thievery and in the Third World where I have traveled, it isn't hard to see!

Sorry to bust your bubble, these are the FACTS!
 

Martin Le Acadien

Electoral Member
Sep 29, 2004
454
0
16
Province perdue du Canada, Louisian
Re: RE: Your thoughts on a Fe

Numure said:
Sorry Martin, but I will trust Rev's opinion before yours. Over the the time I've been a member of this community, his opinions arnt half based. Before he reachs an opinion on any given subject, he has researched it, and learned about ti threw various means. He is also capable to change his opinion if proven wrong, or incorrect. Now for that, I've come to trust him on many issues.

But you, seem more emotional in your opinions, less educated and more corrupted by Corporate mass media. With your last posts, another reason for me not to trust your opinion, or by far almost not listen to it. You're incoherent, quite hard to understand and you do not explain your opinion very well. As much as I want to believe you, your proof is less then accurate and your sources... scepticle. Don't take it personnal.

I added some research material to the post to demonstrate the points contained in my posts, I respect his points but I know what I have seen and experienced.

My emotion is that I understand more about the subject than most US or Canadian Citizens due to my involvement in Mexican Relief on a personal level. I have watched poor farmers till their field with OXEN while the tractors set idle due to the Government Bureaucrat not want to run them! As a husband and father, I understand the frustration being felt by a man unable to have dignity given by providing a decent living to his family and a future to his children!

My education:

1. Graduated University. AS & BS Petr. Engineer
2. Qualified a a NOTAIRE in Louisiana, similiar to that in
Quebec, Louisiana uses a Civil Law System! NOT AN EASY TEST!
3. Amateur Radio Operator, hold Morse Certificate.

As far as Mass Media, I already told you, LOOK FOR THE ANGLE, all news is propaganda! Even CBC has been caught on this one here in Louisiana on the Acadian Story when they reported that the "Cajun" Culture has assimulated into the Melting Pot! I bet that one was edited like that to try to down play the legal challenges of the Grand Derangement!

Like a lawyer, hearsay is questionable, only if you see it, is it admissible in court! Ask about the facts.

I don't take it personal, this is a forum to understand viewpoints, not a thesis debate at the university.
 

Martin Le Acadien

Electoral Member
Sep 29, 2004
454
0
16
Province perdue du Canada, Louisian
Re: RE: Your thoughts on a Federation of the Americas?

Rick van Opbergen said:
"But you, seem more emotional in your opinions, less educated and more corrupted by Corporate mass media." If that is your interpretation of Martin, than I call that some pretty tough conclusions. Martin is has been here for a month, with at least one week not active on canadiancontent.com. He has not participated in many discussions so far. That's why I find your conclusions rather tough. Personally, for me, Martin seems to be opposite, I base that on my conversations I had with him about Acadians and Cajuns, but I know him too little to have a good personal opinion about him.

Must go to work,will miss another week of fine forum discussion, must go to pay taxes and support the brood! 7 days Offshore with 7 days at home!
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
I never called my self an "expert", just a person who has been to Mexico!

You suggested, rather pointedly, that neither I nor any of my sources, relatives, friends, or anybody else who agreed with me knew anything because you had been there. That kind of suggests you are claiming expertise.

!. Mexico is a poor country, it has a Rich Class, Poor Class and a small Middle Class, do you agree? Mexico is a country of contrasts unlike the US and Canada, you might see a million dollar resort next to a slum! Canada, Europe and the US are basically First World Countries with good Infastructure!

Nobody ever argued with that. The difference is in why we think Mexico hasn't done better. Your view is that it's because of corrupt officials. My view is that it's because of US imperialism and the corrupt officials are a by-product of poverty.

2. Mexico has an expanding population which accounts for some of the pressures to emigrate, Agree? 72 million, 1990 census.

No, I don't agree. While there is some emigration because of population pressures, most emigration (legal and illegal) and internal movement within Mexico is because of economic concerns. NAFTA has flooded the market with cheap, subsidized, gm corn, which has made it almost impossible for a Mexican farmer to get a decent price for his crop. The US has acted in a very predatory manner against all attempts by Mexican farmers to keep subsidized crops out of their traditional market.

This is nothing new and certainly is not specific to Mexico. This is the very issue that caused developing nations from Latin America, Africa and Asia to tell Robert Zoellick to piss off in Cancun. To Jean Chretien's credit (and I don't give him credit for much) he had Canada back up the developing countries.

The same battle continued between South American countries and Canada against the US at the FTAA talks in Florida. Again the deal came apart. These talks had a much wider scope, but agricultural subsidies were an important factor, along with US oil interests actions in Venezuela, Brazil, and Columbia.

The major reason for emigration north from all of Latin America continues to be economic. The issue of unionisation and union activists being murdered by militias backed by the US government and US corporations is discussed and acknowledged by activists (and a growing number of governments) in every country except the US, who refuses to tie human rights issues to trade deals.

3. Your Aunt built some schools and taught, that is not unusual, the Catholic Church here in South Louisiana has sponsored several parishes in Mexico, our Sponsored Parish is in Coahila State outside Hermosilla the capital of the State.

Yet you chose to say,
The health care and School you talk about is non existant,
when I mentioned it before.

4. I would like to know more about the Mennonite Situation in Mexico, I know they have the most prospourous farms in Mexico but the Government has been trying to bring them into the ejido system. We too have Mexician "temporary" workers here too in Louisiana.

I asked a man named Klassen why he moved here at the Corn and Apple fest in Morden last year. His answer, "Our crops are worth nothing because of US imports and what you do get paid is in Mexican. If you need to buy equipment it is in American. We got my cousin to sponsor us."

It's a story you hear over and over again if you research this at all. It comes from some Mennonites (they are still better off than most) and most Mexican farmers. It comes from sixteen year old girls working in the Maquiladoras and it comes from old men on farms.

The land is owned by the government, and the ejido is financed by a special national bank which supplies the necessary capital for reclamation, improvement, initial seeding, and so forth. In effect, the bank has replaced the colonial encomendero, with this difference—the laborer is paid on the basis of unit work accomplished.

Since tha land is controlled and owned by the Government, the problem is that if you are not in with the powers to be, your plot can be "appropriated."

Yet attempts at land reforms that allow private ownership by farmers have largely been scuttled by government corruption and bribes paid by land speculators. Further, because crops are worth so little now (see how that keeps coming up) indigenous farmers cannot raise the capital to buy land (most are paid by the value of their crops, not a standard wage) and are reluctant to continue farming when they know that the crops they raise will be worth nothing.


6. Corruption is widespread in Mexico and Latin America with the exception of Costa Rica, a very stable and prosperous country, it has no army, only a small National Police Force, a two party system and welcomes investment! Also very protective of its local industries!

Nobody questions this. The question is why that corruption is being used to benefit foreign corporations while continuing to subjugate the people in Mexico and the rest of Latin America. Since Venezuela has arguably taken the most effective steps in ridding itself of corruption, the answer very definitely lay in reducing the influence of the US government and US corporations over the local elites and spreading the wealth out over a wider swath of the population.

Costa Rica is not a valid example of the challenges facing the rest of South America because it is very much a de facto protectorate of the United States, not a truly sovereign state.


7. Socialism is and has been a failure in Mexico because when you give a Corrupt Politician control over the means of Production and the MONEY, he just can't help himself! In Europe, Canada and the US we have oversight to some degree, but without the oversight, it becomes thievery and in the Third World where I have traveled, it isn't hard to see!

Sorry to bust your bubble, these are the FACTS!

Mexico never had true socialism, Martin. They did attempt a kind of integrated economy, but constant interference from the US government and US corporations handcuffed a lot of government initiatives.

Capitalism has also been an abject failure in Mexico, and for many of the same reasons. When young girls from the Maquiladoras are being preyed on...raped and killed...and there is no serious investigation because the predator is undoubtedly part of the power structure, possibly American; when union activists are murdered in broad daylight and nobody wants to even look for the killers; when people die from water-borne diseases on a daily basis...that is an abject failure.

Sorry to bust your bubble, Martin...things have been getting worse, not better.