Correct, and as far as I understand, Gore & Suzuki demand that anyone that wants to review the settled science should be imprisoned.... How extra sciencey of ole Al and Dave
... And if you don't believe that CO2 has the strength of trapping all that heat all by its lonesome?... What then?
PS - you do understand that CO2 is absolutely, without question and irrevocably proven to be necessary for plant life, right?
... The science is settled on that one too
How do you explain the multiple episodes of cooling/warming/cooling etc (commonly referred to as ice ages) prior to humanity being part of the equation?
Funny how the settled science is unable, in an fashion, to generate a model that explains these past episodes while being able to predict the future.
Your assumptions are so heavily based on a raft of other tenuous assumptions that they have no force whatsoever.
Lying and manipulation is all they got, and yet the ardent supporters still can't see that their messianic leaders of the cause are amassing huge profits based on this blind faith and ignorance... That alone should be enough to motivate any rational person to ask the tough questions of their leadership and their silly models