With Clear Question, Quebeckers Would Stay In Canada

Shiva

Electoral Member
Sep 8, 2005
149
0
16
Toronto
Quebec still torn on future in Canada

By BRIAN LAGHI
Saturday, October 22, 2005 Posted at 3:07 AM EDT
From Saturday's Globe and Mail

Quebeckers are just as divided over independence as they were a decade ago, although they would comfortably vote to stay in Canada if the question were put to them clearly and directly, a new poll indicates.

Ten years after the referendum that almost broke Canada in two, Quebeckers say they would vote to remain in Confederation if asked clearly whether they want to secede. But the survey also finds a stubborn attachment to sovereignty despite the breathing space of a decade, indicating that federalist forces have failed to erode sentiment for independence.

“It's a little bit ‘the glass is half full, the glass is half empty,' ” said Allan Gregg, chairman of the Strategic Counsel, which conducted the poll for The Globe and Mail and CTV News. “But the sad part, from someone who is an unrepentant Canadian, is that after 10 years, we have not created one scintilla of a greater bond with Quebeckers than we had when were on the verge of near-death.”

Asked how Quebeckers would vote if they faced a question similar to the one posed in 1995, 48 per cent said they would opt for the Yes side, compared with 47 per cent who would vote No. The other five per cent didn't know.

And on a related question of whether Quebeckers are in favour of holding another referendum, 49 per cent said they were while 48 per cent were not. Moreover, 59 per cent of Quebeckers surveyed said they believed the Yes forces would win the next referendum. In the rest of the country, 49 per cent of Canadians believed a majority of Quebeckers would vote Yes in another referendum while 44 per cent said they would vote No.

The poll surveyed 1,000 Canadians between Oct. 6 and 13 and is accurate to within 3.1 percentage points 95 per cent of the time.

The Quebec sample comprised 500 individuals. The results come just a week before the anniversary of the 1995 referendum, in which sovereignty was defeated 50.6 per cent to 49.4 per cent.

Mr. Gregg said the results demonstrate that the past 10 years have “created a whole new generation of prospective sovereigntists.”

The results were, however, leavened by findings that a majority of Quebeckers would vote No if asked directly about secession.

That appears to back Ottawa's decision to create the Clarity Act, which allows the House of Commons to override a referendum result if it deems the question unclear or if results are not supported by a clear majority. The act also states that any question not solely referring to secession would be considered too ambiguous.

The poll found that 66 per cent of Quebeckers and 68 per cent of the rest of the country support the requirement for a clear question. When asked whether they would vote “to secede from Canada to become an independent country,” 53 per cent said No, compared with only 43 per cent who said Yes. Another 4 per cent didn't know.

“I think there is an appetite for finality right now,” Mr. Gregg said. “An appetite not simply in English Canada, but even in Quebec.”

He added Canadians might “thank their lucky stars” for the Clarity Act, which many assumed would harm the federalist cause.

The closeness of the 1995 outcome shocked the nation and many federalist politicians, who, five years later, passed the act. Many characterized the referendum question as muddy and blamed it for the tight outcome.

It read: “Do you agree that Quebec should become sovereign, after having made a formal offer to Canada for a new economic and political partnership, within the scope of the Bill Respecting the Future of Quebec, and of the agreement signed on June 12, 1995.”

(The June 12 agreement pledged that the Parti Québécois, the Bloc Québécois and Action Démocratique du Québec work together to achieve such a partnership with the rest of Canada after a Yes vote.)

While the polling results on the need for a clear question might be heartening for federalists, the poll also finds a clear divide between Quebec and the rest of the country on what constitutes a majority.

Fifty per cent of Quebeckers said a simple majority of 50 per cent plus one is enough for the province to leave Canada, while 74 per cent in the rest of Canada said it was not. Of those who said a simple majority was not enough, 54 per cent said the bar should be set at more than 70 per cent. Mr. Gregg said that demonstrates that Canadians outside the province wouldn't accept the outcome if the Yes side won by a simple majority.

That said, the Canadian voting public appears sanguine about the possibility of a breakup, with 76 per cent telling pollsters they'd be willing to negotiate a new partnership with an independent Quebec.

On the question of whether Quebeckers feel more sovereigntist or more federalist over the past 10 years, 60 per cent said they haven't changed their views. Twenty-three 23 per cent said they were more likely to support sovereignty, while 16 per cent were more prone to the federalist argument.And on a related question of whether Quebeckers are in favour of holding another referendum, 49 per cent said they were while 48 per cent were not. Moreover, 59 per cent of Quebeckers surveyed said they believed the Yes forces would win the next referendum. In the rest of the country, 49 per cent of Canadians believed a majority of Quebeckers would vote Yes in another referendum while 44 per cent said they would vote No.

The poll surveyed 1,000 Canadians between Oct. 6 and 13 and is accurate to within 3.1 percentage points 95 per cent of the time.

The Quebec sample comprised 500 individuals. The results come just a week before the anniversary of the 1995 referendum, in which sovereignty was defeated 50.6 per cent to 49.4 per cent.

Mr. Gregg said the results demonstrate that the past 10 years have “created a whole new generation of prospective sovereigntists.”

The results were, however, leavened by findings that a majority of Quebeckers would vote No if asked directly about secession.

That appears to back Ottawa's decision to create the Clarity Act, which allows the House of Commons to override a referendum result if it deems the question unclear or if results are not supported by a clear majority. The act also states that any question not solely referring to secession would be considered too ambiguous.

The poll found that 66 per cent of Quebeckers and 68 per cent of the rest of the country support the requirement for a clear question. When asked whether they would vote “to secede from Canada to become an independent country,” 53 per cent said No, compared with only 43 per cent who said Yes. Another 4 per cent didn't know.

“I think there is an appetite for finality right now,” Mr. Gregg said. “An appetite not simply in English Canada, but even in Quebec.”

He added Canadians might “thank their lucky stars” for the Clarity Act, which many assumed would harm the federalist cause.

The closeness of the 1995 outcome shocked the nation and many federalist politicians, who, five years later, passed the act. Many characterized the referendum question as muddy and blamed it for the tight outcome.

It read: “Do you agree that Quebec should become sovereign, after having made a formal offer to Canada for a new economic and political partnership, within the scope of the Bill Respecting the Future of Quebec, and of the agreement signed on June 12, 1995.”

(The June 12 agreement pledged that the Parti Québécois, the Bloc Québécois and Action Démocratique du Québec work together to achieve such a partnership with the rest of Canada after a Yes vote.)

While the polling results on the need for a clear question might be heartening for federalists, the poll also finds a clear divide between Quebec and the rest of the country on what constitutes a majority.

Fifty per cent of Quebeckers said a simple majority of 50 per cent plus one is enough for the province to leave Canada, while 74 per cent in the rest of Canada said it was not. Of those who said a simple majority was not enough, 54 per cent said the bar should be set at more than 70 per cent. Mr. Gregg said that demonstrates that Canadians outside the province wouldn't accept the outcome if the Yes side won by a simple majority.

That said, the Canadian voting public appears sanguine about the possibility of a breakup, with 76 per cent telling pollsters they'd be willing to negotiate a new partnership with an independent Quebec.

On the question of whether Quebeckers feel more sovereigntist or more federalist over the past 10 years, 60 per cent said they haven't changed their views. Twenty-three 23 per cent said they were more likely to support sovereignty, while 16 per cent were more prone to the federalist argument.
 

Nascar_James

Council Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,640
0
36
Oklahoma, USA
Yep. I'm one of those that believes it's more than likely now than ever to happen....a YES vote. On the last referendum, two thirds of the French speaking in Quebec voted in favor of Separation. Had it not been for the English speaking vote in Montreal, the Seperatists would have easily won. Now 10 years have passed and many English speaking folks have left (I included), and I doubt that the English speaking newcomers to Quebec match those (in numbers) that have left. So it very likely looks like the Seperatists may win a next referendum, may be by the skin of their teeth, but they can win.

The problem with a Yes vote would come up in places where you have a substantial mix of English and French speaking folks.... Montreal. I could picture a worst case scenario where the West part of Montreal (overwhelmingly English speaking) tries to partition itself from the East part of Montreal (overwhelmingly French speaking) to remain in Canada. That's when the fun begins ... I can see a Belfast in the works here. Civil unrest in the streets, armed confrontation and ultimately declaration of Martial law in Montreal.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
I guess Canadians also believe that a precedent for seccession won't just stop with Quebec.

Scotland has a Home Rule parliament.

Nunavut has its capital on Baffin Island still?

One of the strands of DNA in all Democracies is the desire to secede.
 

Durgan

Durgan
Oct 19, 2005
248
0
16
Brantford, ON
www.durgan.org
There has never been a clear question on any plebesite I have ever seen.

Do you want an Independent Quebec outside the present Canadian fabric. (Or something similiar. Not likely).
Yes or No.

Read the last one in Quebec. It was convoluted. I suspect most people didn't know what they were voting for. Sort of like Mark Twain's "The War Prayer", which describes the typical half explained event.

Durgan.
 

s_lone

Council Member
Feb 16, 2005
2,233
30
48
44
Montreal
Re: RE: With Clear Question, Quebeckers Would Stay In Canada

Durgan said:
Read the last one in Quebec. It was convoluted. I suspect most people didn't know what they were voting for.
Durgan.

I agree that the question wasn't very straightforward but anyone with a functionning brain knew what the issues were about. Saying that Quebecers didn't know what they were voting for really is an insult to their intelligence.
 

Said1

Hubba Hubba
Apr 18, 2005
5,338
70
48
52
Das Kapital
RE: With Clear Question,

Harris threatened to build a security type fence wall along the board last time around. I'm really curious about those working on the Ontario side and what would happen to their jobs here? Most that I know on that side voted no....with a few excpetions who thought seperation wouldn't mean losing their job.
 

Hank C Cheyenne

Electoral Member
Sep 17, 2005
403
0
16
Calgary, Alberta.
...I sure hope they don't vote to seperate......it would have a domino effect....of course Alberta and even parts of the maritimes would possible attempt succession...and if Quebec seperates you can bet there will be outrage at the sponshorship scandal as the motivatior that pushed Quebec over the edge....be it true or otherwise.

Also loosing that population of around 8 million would be counterproductive and we need to keep Quebec in Canada. With the loss of Alberta and Quebec Canada's population would become the population of Australia.....
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: With Clear Question,

We won't lose Alberta, Hank. Maybe you should move back to Amerika though...you seem to have deep hatred of this country.
 

Nascar_James

Council Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,640
0
36
Oklahoma, USA
Re: RE: With Clear Question,

Reverend Blair said:
We won't lose Alberta, Hank. Maybe you should move back to Amerika though...you seem to have deep hatred of this country.

You forget Rev, seperatist sentiment is just as popular now in Alberta as it was in Quebec during the quiet revolution of the 1960's. One decade later it became a reality.
 

Vanni Fucci

Senate Member
Dec 26, 2004
5,239
17
38
8th Circle, 7th Bolgia
the-brights.net
Re: RE: With Clear Question,

Nascar_James said:
Reverend Blair said:
We won't lose Alberta, Hank. Maybe you should move back to Amerika though...you seem to have deep hatred of this country.

You forget Rev, seperatist sentiment is just as popular now in Alberta as it was in Quebec during the quiet revolution of the 1960's. One decade later it became a reality.

How's about you back that up with some facts there Nero... :roll:
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: With Clear Question,

It runs around 30%, Hank. 10% is extremely soft. It goes up when the Harperites and Drunken King Ralph whine, but that support is even softer. That is especially true since so many Albertans are from other regions of Canada.
 

Nascar_James

Council Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,640
0
36
Oklahoma, USA
Re: RE: With Clear Question,

Vanni Fucci said:
Nascar_James said:
Reverend Blair said:
We won't lose Alberta, Hank. Maybe you should move back to Amerika though...you seem to have deep hatred of this country.

You forget Rev, seperatist sentiment is just as popular now in Alberta as it was in Quebec during the quiet revolution of the 1960's. One decade later it became a reality.

How's about you back that up with some facts there Nero... :roll:


Alberta Seperation

Here's an exerpt from the link above ...

For some perspective on this, separatist sentiment in Alberta had historically percolated around 10-20% -- the same level as in Quebec at the start of the "Quiet Revolution" in 1960. By 1976 that had risen to about 45%, at which point the first PQ government was elected.


Here's an interesting link from the Western Standard ...

http://www.westernstandard.ca/website/index.cfm?page=article&article_id=928


Also interesting is the last paragraph from this link ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberta_separatism
 

Hank C Cheyenne

Electoral Member
Sep 17, 2005
403
0
16
Calgary, Alberta.
"Political events in the early 21st century has led to a resurgence in interest in Alberta separatism. In the 2004 federal election, the governing Liberal Party of Canada was returned with a minority government despite allegations of corruption. Albertans voted overwhelmingly (61.7%) for the opposition Conservative Party of Canada, while only 22.0% of Albertans supported the Liberals."

"In January 2004 Premier Ralph Klein told the Canadian edition of Readers Digest that one in four Albertans (25%) were in support of separation. A recent poll suggest that the level of support for separation may be higher than Klein's estimate. An August 2005 poll published by the Western Standard pegged support for exploring the idea of forming a country at 42% in Alberta. By comparison, support for Quebec separatism at any given time is pegged at about 37%."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberta_separatism
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: With Clear Question,

Yeah, 'cause the Western Standard is a reliable source of information. No, wait....it's a reliable source of bird cage liner. It contains no information.
 

Whiplash

New Member
Oct 29, 2005
2
0
1
Gatineau, QC
Concerning the Quebec referendums, it is worth noting that in the 1995 referendum the NO side spent 10 times the YES budget. The other tendancy that is clear is that the new generations of voters are much more in favor of independance (French speakers anyway).

I am one of those sovereignists that respects the opinions and desirs of federalists as long as they also show respect towards me and my beliefs...and I was not old enough to vote at the 1995 referendum. Now near 30 years of age I am ready to embark on a new and exciting journey...regardless of the challenges that undoubtedly come with.
 

Nascar_James

Council Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,640
0
36
Oklahoma, USA
Whiplash said:
Concerning the Quebec referendums, it is worth noting that in the 1995 referendum the NO side spent 10 times the YES budget. The other tendancy that is clear is that the new generations of voters are much more in favor of independance (French speakers anyway).

I am one of those sovereignists that respects the opinions and desirs of federalists as long as they also show respect towards me and my beliefs...and I was not old enough to vote at the 1995 referendum. Now near 30 years of age I am ready to embark on a new and exciting journey...regardless of the challenges that undoubtedly come with.

Whiplash, are you one of the 5-10 percent of English speakers living in Quebec who's a Separatist?
 

Whiplash

New Member
Oct 29, 2005
2
0
1
Gatineau, QC
No, I'm french...and bilingual. 8)

Also, why is it that the survey is of 1,000 people and 500 are outside Quebec? How is that representative of how Quebeckers would vote? :?
 

Nascar_James

Council Member
Jun 6, 2005
1,640
0
36
Oklahoma, USA
I think they had two separate surveys, Whiplash.

They asked 500 folks in Quebec how they would vote if they faced a question similar to one on the 1995 referendum. They were also asked if they were in favor of another referendum and if they beleived the YES side could win the next referendum.

Then 1000 folks comprising the rest of the Canadians outside of Quebec were asked if they beleived the YES forces could win the next referendum.

It makes sense to ask the first two questions to folks in Quebec only. Wheras the third one is simply an opinion related question, it was asked to all Canadians.
 

Jo Canadian

Council Member
Mar 15, 2005
2,488
1
38
PEI...for now
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: With Clear Question, Quebeckers Would Stay In Canada

s_lone said:
Durgan said:
Read the last one in Quebec. It was convoluted. I suspect most people didn't know what they were voting for.
Durgan.

I agree that the question wasn't very straightforward but anyone with a functionning brain knew what the issues were about. Saying that Quebecers didn't know what they were voting for really is an insult to their intelligence.

Exactly....


Do you think English Canadians have the brains to figure any of this out....? NO. And then they wonder what all the trouble is.