White people have been banned from an ‘anti-racism’ event at a British university
- Thread starter Blackleaf
- Start date
Seeing as how you're a non-white man, you'd think you'd be a bit more enlightened.
It's a white supremacy symbol.
Ever notice how you have a real penchant for giving orders you can't back up?
I'd have a feeling you'd have no problem had it been a black supremacy or a Red Indian supremacy symbol.
I, on the other hand, as a proud, white, straight, Anglican male, have no problem with the symbol whatsoever, and anyone who does is a member of the racist anti-white brigade which wants to wipe out evil Whitey Mann from Western society.
Look. A Red Indian should have no say in white men's issues. We're constantly told by the feminists that men should have no say whatsoever in women's issues and women's rights, so surely the same rules should apply to race.
As a Red Indian and therefore a member of a protected "vulnerable group" (i.e. anyone who isn't a straight, white, able-bodied, non-Goth, Christian male), you can have no idea what it's like to be a member of the most persecuted member of modern Western society.
I ain't protected from anything. And while it's true I don't know what it's like to be a whingy little pansy, I've seen enough of them to accurately ID them.
Yes, you do. You're good at playing the poor put upon Red Indian when you want to be.
But don't worry. You're not a white, Christian, able-bodied, heterosexual male and so, as a member of a vulnerable group, you have all the help and support you need.
"White supremacist" is just an anti-white slur peddled by the white-haters on the Left to describe anyone who dares to be proud of being white (especially if they're a heterosexual Christian male).
The term "black supremacist" is never used to describe all those coloured folk who take part in black pride marches.
You're a racist. That's all you are. You're a racist who hates white people. And so is Tecumseh's Boner.
No, white supremacist is a term for people who want special, superior legal status for whites. Like you.
That's because they're not supremacists. No black leader or organization of any significance has ever advocated as superior legal status for blacks.
"White supremacist" is a term used by white-hating racists like you to describe those who take part in marches to show their pride in being white. Now let that be the end of it. You'll not sway me.
And this is not about wanting "superior status for whites." This is about the fact that whites (especially men) in Western society today are treated as second-class citizens by your lot and there is a programme underway right now, under the guise of "multicurturalism", to wipe out the white race in white countries. This has to STOP and white people need to be treated as well as all the others.
Black people take part in similar marches yet are never accused of being "black supremacists".
If you believe that black supremacy doesn't then you're living in Cloud Cuckoo Land.
Anti-white bigots like you are never funny.
More white people need to take to the streets to march to end the everyday discrimination they receive in the West today. White culture and the white race itself is deliberately being subjected to an attempt at extermination.
We constantly get told by our "superiors" in Britain that multiculturalism is good because it "enriches British culture." But why does British culture even need "enriching" in the first place? We have our own perfectly good white British culture and it doesn't need "enriching." The real reason is that our political leaders hate and detest the white British race and want to import brown people from MBongo MBongo Land to gradually wipe out the white race from the UK.
The culture of white people.
The clue is in the name.
Yep. He's a member of the Establishment. They all hate white, Christian people and British culture. That's why they like uncontrolled immigration. They think British culture needs "enriching" (as one politician put it recently). But I say there's nothing wrong with white British culture. It doesn't need being enriched by the importation of cultural practices (many of them dubious, just take a look at the Lutfur Rahman fiasco in Tower Hamlets) from MBongo MBongo Land and Budbudbudstan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=mHqRtLeI_pE
What are the characteristics of this alleged culture?
So every member of the "Establishment" hates white Christians? Must be tough seeing as how most of them are white Christians.
There's nothing alleged about it. Britain has its own culture, a white Christian culture, that is perfectly fine and doesn't need "enriching" by the importation of cultures practised by brown-skinned or black-skinned or yellow-skinned Buttonheads, Fig Gobblers and Ping Pongs from other countries.
Britain should be kept British. It should be white British culture, not "multicuturalism." People who come to Britain must adopt British traditions and practises, not import their own. They should eat fish and chips, not dogs and curried goat's head. When in Rome, do what the Romans do.
Most of them do.
It is tough for them. Like all Left-wingers, the British Establishment is inflicted by self-hate.
So basically you're advocating a culture you can't define and of which you can't name a single characteristic.
OK, thanks. You've proven your quality once again.