It is not an issue of technology, but for the most part an issue of inefficiency, Mad_hatter.
I would need to at least half agree with you here. The waiting list problem could probably be improved or at least circumvented somewhat with better organization and communication between health care facilities. Still, I believe this problem is not nearly as bad as our critics claim.
I doubt the US spends more on health care, overall.
Well then, allow me to dig up some numbers for you. From the CBC (
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/healthcare/priceofcare.html)
Canada spends 10% of their total GDP on health care.
America spends 14.6% of their total GDP on health care.
Just for fun, I'll throw in some numbers from a few other countries:
France... 9.7%
Germany... 10.9%
Denmark... 8.8%
Sweden... 9.2%
As you can see, it's clear that the United States spends far more on health care. Now let's look at the return for both countries. A simple glance into some stats provided by the UN are rather telling.
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/socind/health.htm
For Canada, life expectancy at birth is 77.3 years for a male and 82.4 years for a female.
compared with US figures where life expectancy is 74.6 for a male and 80 for a female.
Similarly with infant mortality rate. Canada's is 5 (I believe per 1000?) and the United states is 7. In terms of child mortality rate Canada is 0.3 for males and 0.2 for females. The US has similar, but still higher numbers at 0.4 for males and 0.3 for females.
Now, if one were to examine figures from some European or even Asian countres (take China for example) it is made clear that Canada still has a long way to go in terms of improving their health care system. However, it is most obvious that compared with the American model we are way ahead.
PS - I'm not sure if a mod wants to split this topic into one solely devoted to health care (perhaps private vs. public systems) as it seems to have run way off track from the original Green Party debate.