Well of course the USA, the UK and now Canada are Suckers

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
The diplomat urged the U.S.-led international coalition to take the “necessary military means to fight this challenge on the ground.”




Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) ripped Saudi Arabia Friday after the nation’s top diplomat suggested the U.S. would have to deploy ground troops to ultimately defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).


“I find it remarkable that Saudi Arabia, which borders Iraq and is controlled by a multi-billion dollar family, is demanding that U.S. combat troops have ‘boots on the ground’ against ISIS. Where are the Saudi troops?” Sanders, a potential 2016 presidential candidate, said in a statement.


“With the third largest military budget in the world and an army far larger than ISIS, the Saudi government must accept its full responsibility for stability in their own region of the world,” he added.


The sharp words come the day after Prince Saud al-Faisal, the Saudi foreign minister, expressed concern that Iran’s military is increasing its support to Baghdad’s forces in the fight against the terror group, especially around the city of Tikrit.


Sanders flatly rejected the notion that America must lead the vanguard against ISIS.


“Ultimately, this is a profound struggle for the soul of Islam, and the anti-ISIS Muslim nations must lead that fight. While the United States and other western nations should be supportive, the Muslim nations must lead,” he said.






http://sputniknews.com/us/20150307/1019176293.html
 
Last edited:

Sal

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 29, 2007
17,135
33
48
“Ultimately, this is a profound struggle for the soul of Islam, and the anti-ISIS Muslim nations must lead that fight. While the United States and other western nations should be supportive, the Muslim nations must lead,” he said.
yup...
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,938
2,771
113
New Brunswick
Sanders was absolutely correct; sadly the war mongers of the US are too stupid (like the sheep they are) to think and reason that out for themselves.

My question is, why should it be, or why does it have to be, the US/West that leads this so called coalition and has to spend the money to do so and do more work than, say, the other nations in the region? What's wrong with Saudi Arabia doing it's part to deal with this - for now - regional problem?