Hard-Luck Henry said:After the appointment of John Roberts, most sensible-minded people in the US would have hoped that Bush would at least try to give the impression that some semblance of balance existed in the Supreme Court. That being the case, the replacement for Sandra Day O'connor should be someone in the same mould, someone who is not a right-wing hardliner, someone whose opinion cannot be prejudged, someone who will maintain the balance of the court.
Lo, who do they get? Another Bush crony.
Would the last true democrat to leave America please turn out the light?
Reverend Blair said:At what point do we open the borders to refugees seeking asylum from the Bush regime?
Texas1 said:Hard-Luck Henry said:You obviously don’t know the process. It’s the President’s choice, not a guide line of rules, not a consensus of DNC people. He was voted in knowing that he would have at least 1, possibility of 2, now a real possibility of 3 (wow) nominations. If he puts up David Duke and he’s passed by the senate guess what, he’s in.
Yikkes! David Duke, but were lucky, he is a convicted Felon, can not hold Public Office!
But then again, he could be pardoned.
OY VEY, 1213 miles to the nearest Canadian Border Customs House!