Trump Administration Fires Key Federal Climate Change Advisory Board

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
Trump Administration Fires Key Federal Climate Change Advisory Board



You’ve probably never heard of the National Climate Assessment (NCA) before, but that’s probably because it was simply getting on with its job. Comprised of around 300 scientists and up to 60 federal advisors, it is a group tasked with working out how climate change impacts the US, now and in the future.

As study after study has shown, the environmental, health, economic and social impacts of climate change on America will be nothing short of severe, so the NCA’s mission is pretty vital. So that’s why academics and officials are up in arms over Trump’s decision to shut the NCA’s advisory board down.

These federal advisors – a mixture of academics, local officials, and industry execs – are there specifically to disseminate the complex scientific results that the NCA produce every four years. They are there to communicate the science to politicians and private-sector chiefs as clearly as possible in order to help point their decision-making in the right direction.

As reported by the Washington Post, the Trump administration decided to let the charter guiding the advisory committee naturally expire without renewal, which it did this past Sunday.

Importantly, the next NCA report, due in 2018, will still be completed on time. There is just no one left attached to the NCA that can explain it to administration officials and other agencies.

It’s a petty decision by an administration that, for the sake of pleasing the base and keeping certain donors happy, is perfectly happy to bury its head in the sand while the rest of the world moves on.

There’s no two ways about it: the Trump administration is engaging in an all-out war on science. Giant funding cuts loom, and scientists themselves are getting bullied, censored or fired at a breakneck pace from major federal agencies.

Not too long ago, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) dismissed pretty much all of the scientists sitting on its own advisory panel. At the same time, Scott Pruitt, the EPA’s head, is planning to televise a showdown between climate scientists and climate deniers – something which will only exacerbate the erroneous notion that the science isn’t “settled”.

Others academics in the Department of Energy – headed by climate denier Rick Perry – and in the Department of the Interior are getting “reassigned” to mere accounting positions, in the hope that they quit out of frustration.

It is completely unsurprising then that scientists are running for Congress themselves. We’d suggest that if you don’t want the Trump administration to trash America’s scientific legacy, you should vote for pro-science lawmakers whenever you get the chance.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
something which will only exacerbate the erroneous notion that the science isn’t “settled”.
"The science is settled", said no actual, real scientist ever.
That phrase is a leftard mantra similar to calling someone a racist. It's intent is to try and shut down discussion/debate and nothing more.

You can see it in microcosm in here. Seems to be a lot of those lefty and proggy types who have serious allergic reactions to stuff like facts and reality. GIGO; applies to humans as much as it applies to computer models.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,545
9,612
113
Washington DC
"The science is settled", said no actual, real scientist ever.
Of course not. It was said by a politician. However, would you react the same way to a statement that "the science is settled on the theory of gravity?"

That phrase is a leftard mantra similar to calling someone a racist. It's intent is to try and shut down discussion/debate and nothing more.
That's one interpretation. It could also be seen as trying to move the discussion to what to do about it.

You can see it in microcosm in here. Seems to be a lot of those lefty and proggy types who have serious allergic reactions to stuff like facts and reality. GIGO; applies to humans as much as it applies to computer models.
You're half right. If you include the right, you'll be all right.