The Universe is the Same, Everywhere We Look.

[socratus]

The Universe is the Same, Everywhere We Look.
Even More than Cosmologists Predicted
August 4, 2020 by Brian Koberlein
------
No matter which direction you look in the Universe, the view
is basically the same if you look far enough. Our local neighborhood
is populated with bright nebulae, star clusters, and dark clouds of gas
and dust. There are more stars toward the center of the Milky Way
than there are in other directions. But across millions, and billions,
of light-years, galaxies cluster evenly in all directions, and everything
starts to look the same. In astronomy, we say the Universe is
homogeneous and isotropic. Put another way, the Universe is smooth.
-------
https://www.universetoday.com/14731...e-look-even-more-than-cosmologists-predicted/
------------
The universe (as a whole) is homogenous, isotopic, smooth. flat.
Gravity is a cosmic place where the local space is not flat . . .
Gravity masses are only about 5% in the whole universe . . .
Only about 5% of whole space is NOT flat, 95% IS a flat, smooth continuum.
===

 

[socratus]

The cosmic space (as a whole) is homogenous, isotopic,
smooth (flat)
1 - The cosmic space is very cold (the temperature
is about zero). Then there is possibility to use the ''theory
of ideal gas'' (has temperature T=0K) and say, ''the cosmic
space is filled with Boltzmann's mass-molar particles (k)''
2 - The cosmic space is very cold (the temperature
is about zero). Then there is possibility to use the ''theory of
black body'' (has temperature T=0K) and say, '' ''the cosmic
space is filled with Planck's energy particles of action (h)''
3 - Then is possible to guess, that interaction between (k)
and (h) particles can change the homogenous, isotopic,
smooth (flat) structure of the cosmic (vacuum) state.
---

 

[socratus]

New approach refines the Hubble's constant and age of universe
July 27, 2020
Source: University of Oregon
Summary:
Using known distances of 50 galaxies from Earth to refine calculations
in Hubble's constant, astronomers estimates the age of the universe
at 12.6 billion years.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200727114724.htm
---------
Using the telescope of Earth size and different Hubble's constant
would give possibility to see the singularity of big-bang
=====

 

[socratus]

An amateur story of space
--------
Euclid created mathematical 2-D space
Euclidean space is a scene where the Earth events take place
Euclidean space is an absolute and rigid, nothing can change it
#
In 1908 Minkowski mathematically showed that Einstein's
SR theory would be more beautiful if to use 4-D.
Most important, the 4-D is as flat as 2-D, only one (2-D) is used
as Earth scene and another (4-D) is used as a Cosmic scene.
And from Cosmic view the Earth's scene is looked as the 3-D.
#
During 1830 - 1854 Lobachevsky, János Bolyai and Riemann separately
and independently had an idea, maybe, some ''hidden force'' can change
the Euclidean 2-D. And they created non-Euclidean geometry.
Many years this mathematical idea was considered as an abstract idea
#
But in 1915 Einstein by using Riemann geometry
(plus using ''hidden matter'' -- mass and energy)
showed that the Riemann geometry can have practical profit.
#
The Earth ''empty'' space (air) is filled with different molecules
The Cosmic ''empty'' space (vacuum) is filled with different ''virtual particles''
Both spaces are real.
----
Best wishes
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
====

 

[socratus]

The physical laws on the Earth scene are known
The physical laws on the Cosmic scene are unknown

 

[socratus]

According to the WMAP (2013 measurement) the Cosmic Space is ''pretty flat'' to within 0,4% - 0,5%
The planet Earth is a gravity - ''ball''

 

[socratus]

According to the WMAP (2013) measurement the
Cosmic space is ''pretty flat'' to within 0,4% - 0,5%
The reality is the WMAP (2013) measurement and the delusion is
the Minkowski math 4- dimensional cosmic geometry of the light cone

 

[socratus]

Quantum Escapism
How quantum mechanics gives me a refuge from reality
By John Horgan on August 22, 2020
---
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/quantum-escapism/
========

 

[Blackleaf]

I've just been out in the yard. Cold, but it's a lovely clear night and, due to little light pollution, I could see a load of stars. Mighty Orion looms overhead and red giant Betelgeuse, even though light from it takes around 700 years to reach us, looks quite red (we're seeing it as it was around 700 years ago).

I took this picture of it, but unfortunately I don't think it can be seen. The light at the bottom is just a nearby light and the white line is a washing line.

 

[Blackleaf]

The last star in the Universe will die in around a quadrillion years from now. After that, black holes will devour everything before eventually evaporating. But the Universe will still be around for an unimaginably vast period of time after that. It is thought the Universe will die in around a googolplex years from now. A googolplex is so big that, even writing it at the Planck level, there isn't enough space on the observable Universe to write it in full decimal form. A typical book can contain a million zeroes. In order to write out a googolplex, you would need 10 trigintillion books. If each of those books weighed 100 grams, then all of them together would have a mass 7 duodecillion times greater than the observable Universe.

Basically, the Universe is going to be around for a long time to come. In fact, at 13.5 billion years, it's still just a newborn baby.

 

[socratus]

Quantum Theory Rebuilt From Simple Physical Principles
Physicists are trying to rewrite the axioms of quantum theory from scratch in an effort to understand what it all means. The problem? They’ve been almost too successful.
-----
Scientists have been using quantum theory for almost a century now, but embarrassingly they still don’t know what it means. An informal poll taken at a 2011 conference on Quantum Physics and the Nature of Reality showed that there’s still no consensus on what quantum theory says about reality — the participants remained deeply divided about how the theory should be interpreted.
Some physicists just shrug and say we have to live with the fact that quantum mechanics is weird. So particles can be in two places at once, or communicate instantaneously over vast distances? Get over it. After all, the theory works fine. If you want to calculate what experiments will reveal about subatomic particles, atoms, molecules and light, then quantum mechanics succeeds brilliantly.
But some researchers want to dig deeper. They want to know why quantum mechanics has the form it does, and they are engaged in an ambitious program to find out. It is called quantum reconstruction, and it amounts to trying to rebuild the theory from scratch based on a few simple principles.
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/...XtlOOTDNRqj_pfiASdMdIyTbc4ZhqA7dIfYpB-o5smYj8