Talking to yourself again. Or at least, certainly not responding to anything I've posted.
Do you not understand your own analogy's?
Talking to yourself again. Or at least, certainly not responding to anything I've posted.
Yes, quite well, thanks. What I don't understand is you taking my analogies (note spelling) and using them as a springboard to leap into whatever the hell is going on in your head.Do you not understand your own analogy's?
Do you not understand your own analogy's?
Yes, quite well, thanks. What I don't understand is you taking my analogies (note spelling) and using them as a springboard to leap into whatever the hell is going on in your head.
But I truly do hope you're having fun with it.
No, an attack on spelling would be "What kind of f*cking idiot can't spell analogies right?" That would be a gerryh special. This is more of a reminder.In other words, no, he doesn't understand his own analogies.
Note the attack on the spelling. nuff said.
No, an attack on spelling would be "What kind of f*cking idiot can't spell analogies right?" That would be a gerryh special. This is more of a reminder.
I note without surprise that you didn't address the idea.
Your "interpretation" is not "new". It is the way it has been looked at for ages. It's men against women. It's non productive. It's antagonistic.
...and Justin Trudeau wants to allow Sharia Law in Canada YIKES!!!
Seems odd to me. Killing unfaithful wives and disobedient daughters is as Texan as racism and ignorance.Why are you folks so hostile toward multiculturalism? Seems to me you're too euro-centric.