The real history of the Gunpowder Plot

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,927
1,910
113
New BBC drama Gunpowder dramatises the events of one of the most famous thwarted assassinations in history – the Gunpowder Plot, where radical Catholics attempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament to kill King James I and inspire an uprising.

But when making the drama, star Kit Harington and his fellow cast were surprised to find how little both they and the general public knew about the true events that transpired back in 1605...

The real history of the Gunpowder Plot

How accurate is new BBC drama Gunpowder when it comes to the actual events?



Kit Harington, Edward Holcroft and Tom Cullen in Gunpowder (BBC, HF)

By Huw Fullerton
Saturday, 21st October 2017
RadioTimes

New BBC drama Gunpowder dramatises the events of one of the most famous thwarted assassinations in history – the Gunpowder Plot, where radical Catholics attempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament to kill King James I and inspire an uprising.

But when making the drama, star Kit Harington and his fellow cast were surprised to find how little both they and the general public knew about the true events that transpired back in 1605, from the identity of the main plotter (actually Harington’s ancestor Robert Catesby and not Guy Fawkes, as most assume) to what actually happened to Parliament.

“When you ask people about the Gunpowder plot, they say Guy Fawkes,” Harington says. “And some of them don’t know whether the Houses of Parliament were blown up or not.”

“I think we’ve forgotten what it’s actually about,” Shaun Dooley, who plays Sir William Wade in the series, agrees. “For me growing up it was more about earning money to buy sweets!”

“We used to just think that when you went to Bonfire Night it was a celebration of Guy Fawkes,” Robert Emms, who plays priest John Gerard, added. “And actually he represents the Pope, which in itself is macabre. I think we forget what these things mean.”

With that in mind, here’s what REALLY happened in the Gunpowder Plot – and how it all blew up in the conspirators’ faces.

What is the background to the Gunpowder Plot?



When King Henry VIII took control of the English Church from the Vatican in Rome during the 1530s, he sparked decades of religious tension in England, with Catholics finding themselves repressed by the newly separate Protestant Church of England and later rules (introduced by Queen Elizabeth I) even fining, imprisoning or executing recusants (i.e., those who refused to attend Anglican services in England and Wales).

By the time James I (aka James VI of Scotland) came to the throne in 1603, Catholics were hopeful that he might treat them more fairly, as he was perceived to have more sympathy for the faith that his late mother (Mary, Queen of Scots) had practised, and preferred exiling practitioners of Catholicism to having them executed.

However, James did not make significant moves to end the persecution of Catholics, leaving a particularly desperate man – Robert Catesby – to devise a more drastic means to his end goal of a Catholic Britain.

Who planned the Gunpowder Plot?


The Gunpowder Plot conspirators

Despite Guy Fawkes’ strong association with the Gunpowder Plot, it was actually Robert Catesby who masterminded the plot, reputedly first coming up with the plan in early 1604 and recruiting likeminded people to his cause soon afterwards.

Catesby enlisted the likes of swordsman John “Jack” Wright (Luke Neal in the drama), Thomas Percy and his cousin Thomas Wintour (Edward Holcroft) in the early stages of the plan, and told Wintour his aim to destroy “the Parliament howse with Gunpowder…. in that place have they done us all the mischiefe, and perchance God hath designed that place for their punishment.” This dialogue is directly adapted into Gunpowder’s first episode.

When Wintour went to Flanders seeking help from the Catholic authorities in Spain, he found no assistance, but he did find Guy Fawkes (Tom Cullen), a competent soldier and committed Catholic, who he brought back to England in April 1604 to aid in the plot.


Tom Cullen as Guy Fawkes in Gunpowder (BBC)

Thomas Percy was recruited soon after, and the five conspirators held their first meeting on 20th May 1604, probably in The Duck and Drake Inn just off the Strand, where they swore an oath of secrecy and began their plans. Later additions to the group included Thomas Wintour’s brother Robert, Catesby’s servant Thomas Bates (who discovered the plot by accident), John Grant, John Wright’s brother Christopher, Ambrose Rookwood, Francis Tresham and Everard Digby.

While some rumours exist of the conspirators trying to dig tunnels for their assassination attempt, eventually they bought the tenancy to the undercroft beneath the House of Lords instead, storing 36 barrels of gunpowder there by the 20th July 1605. The intention was to wait until the state opening of Parliament (when the King would be in the House of Lords), killing him and his closest advisors and giving the plotters the chance to replace them with a new Catholic-friendly monarchy.

However, the state opening was repeatedly delayed until the 5th of November due to fears of the Plague, by which point Catesby’s finances were becoming strained (potentially why the wealthy Tresham was introduced to the plot at a later time).

The plan at this stage was for Fawkes to light the fuse and escape across the Thames on a boat, with an uprising beginning in the Midlands during which the Princess Elizabeth would be captured. Following this, Fawkes would head to the continent and explain to the Catholic powers what had transpired.

How did the Gunpowder plot go wrong?



Kit Harington and Tom Cullen in Gunpowder (BBC)

Unfortunately for the plotters, however, on Saturday 26th October a letter found its way to Lord Monteagle, Tresham’s brother-in-law, warning him to stay away from the state opening.

The letter read:

My Lord, out of the love I bear to some of your friends, I have a care of your preservation. Therefore I would advise you, as you tender your life, to devise some excuse to shift your attendance at this parliament; for God and man hath concurred to punish the wickedness of this time. And think not slightly of this advertisement, but retire yourself into your country where you may expect the event in safety. For though there be no appearance of any stir, yet I say they shall receive a terrible blow this Parliament; and yet they shall not see who hurts them. This counsel is not to be condemned because it may do you good and can do you no harm; for the danger is passed as soon as you have burnt the letter. And I hope God will give you the grace to make good use of it, to whose holy protection I commend you.


Monteagle immediately brought the letter to Robert Cecil, Earl of Salisbury (played by Mark Gatiss in the drama), who eventually showed it to King James. Noting the word “blow” and aware that there had been stirrings for some time, James suspected “some strategem of fire and powder” in a similar kind of explosion to that which had killed his father Lord Darnley in 1567.

Cecil had already had similar suspicions; a search was conducted above and below Parliament to look for anything suspicious. Eventually Fawkes, who had been left to light the fuse while his fellows rode to the Midlands for the planned uprising, was discovered.

Fawkes was arrested, giving his name as John Johnson, and the barrels of Gunpowder were discovered under Parliament. Fawkes was brought to the King on the morning of 5th November, then taken to the Tower of London to be tortured, and while his resolve held for a while he broke late on 7th November, confessing his part in the plot.

By this point, the names of the other conspirators had already been learned from the interrogation of servants.

What happened to the other Gunpowder Plot conspirators?



A 1754 depiction of Catesby and Percy’s attempted escape from Holbeche House

However, despite popular imagination the story doesn’t end there. While Fawkes was being tortured, Catesby and some others of the plotters were riding to the Midlands, raiding Warwick Castle for supplies and collecting weapons. The news had reached them by this point that the assassination attempt had failed, and after receiving little support from friends and family (afraid of being implicated in the treason themselves), the group holed up in Holbeche House in Staffordshire.

In a slightly ironic twist, while they were there some of the gunpowder they had transported for their weapons caught fire, burning and injuring several of those present (including Catesby).

While some of the plotters fled at this point Catesby refused to let himself be captured and instead decided to stage a last stand. The house was besieged by the Sheriff of Worcester Richard Walsh and his company of 200 men on 8th November, and Catesby was struck down by a musket shot alongside Percy. After being shot Catesby managed to crawl back into the house, where his body was found clutching a picture of the Virgin Mary.

Catesby and Percy were buried near Holbeche, but the Earl of Northampton commanded that the bodies be exhumed and decapitated, with the severed heads put on display outside Parliament.


An execution scene from Gunpowder (BBC)

The remaining plotters were rounded up, arrested and tortured alongside some of their family members, while the government used the revelation of the plot as a reason to further increase the level of persecution aimed at Catholics. King James’ survival also increased his personal popularity and that of his family, while Catholic powers abroad denounced the plotters as atheists and heretics.

After being found guilty of high treason, on 30th January Everard Digby, Robert Wintour, John Grant, and Thomas Bates were dragged through the streets of London to St Paul’s where they were hanged, cut down while fully conscious then castrated (with the genitals burnt in front of them), disembowelled and quartered (chopped into four pieces).

The next day Thomas Wintour, Ambrose Rookwood, Robert Keyes and Guy Fawkes were hanged, drawn and quartered opposite Parliament itself, with Jesuit priest Father Henry Garnet (who had some knowledge of the plot via confession, as depicted by Peter Mullan in Gunpowder) executed in May of the same year.

To this day the Gunpowder Plot is commemorated every 5th November by bonfires, fireworks and the creation of Guy Fawkes effigies – and the Parliamentary cellars are still searched the day before each State Opening of Parliament.



Gunpowder BBC1: What really happened in The Gunpowder Plot? Did Guy Fawkes blow up the Houses of Parliament? - Radio Times
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,927
1,910
113
Being deliberately crushed to death; Catholics hiding from the authorities in secret chambers; a rumoured gay love affair between the King and a nobleman. They are all things which featured in last night's opening episode of the new BBC period drama Gunpowder, about the 1605 Gunpowder Plot, but did they really happen?

Gunpowder fact vs fiction: how accurate is the BBC series?


Renaissance man: Kit Harington as Robert Catesby Credit: BBC

Rebecca Hawkes
22 October 2017
The Telegraph

The first instalment of BBC One’s Gunpowder, a three-part retelling of the infamous 1605 Catholic plot to blow up the House of Lords, and, in the process, King James I, was suitably thrilling. As a bonus, it even featured an angry Jon Snow (sorry, Kit Harington) as chief schemer (and Harington's ancestor) Robert Catesby. (His co-conspirator Guy Fawkes is the name most remembered today, but it was Catesby who was the real brains of the operation.) But just how much of that gruesome first episode really happened? Here’s a quick round up of some of the key questions you might have after watching.

Was Robert Catesby really that dashing/dangerous/angry? And did he really look like Kit Harington?

The answer to the first question, according to contemporary accounts, seems to have been an emphatic yes: Catesby was a passionate rebel and devout Catholic, who believed (evidently) that violence in the name of the right cause was justified. He also, as indicated by his portrayal in the series, seems to have been a man with a gift for inspiring others.

And to the second question? Quite possibly: Harington himself, fascinatingly, is a direct descendant of the gunpowder plotter on his mother’s side (her maiden name was Catesby, and Harington’s full name is Christopher Catesby Harington). "I always knew the connection would be quite a good one to promote [the show] with," the actor told BBC Newsbeat.

That said, contemporary images of Robert show him with a trifle more facial hair than Harington sports in the BBC series: in the early 17th century, beards, a bit like swords, were long and pointy. It’s a minor quibble, though.


Harington (left) with an anonymous portrait of his ancestor Catesby from 1794

Who are the two Catholic women in the first episode, played by Liv Tyler and Sian Webber? And who is the priest?

Liv Tyler is playing Anne Vaux, a real-life woman of the time and committed Catholic who was related to one of the plotters, and who is believed by historians to have had knowledge of the gunpowder plan, without being directly involved in it. The plotter she was related to, however, wasn’t Catesby, as shown in the series, but a different man (Francis Tresham). Peter Mullan’s Henry Garnet, the influential Catholic priest concealed in the wall in the episode, was also a real historical figure – and, like Catesby, was one of the gunpowder plotters.

The unfortunate older woman played by Sian Webber, however – Lady Dorothy Dibdale – seems to have been invented for the purposes of the show. That said, as the next question makes clear, her fate was probably partly inspired by a real case.


From left: Kit Haringon, Liv Tyler and Sian Webber in Gunpowder Credit: Robert Viglasky/BBC

Did gory “crushing-to-death” executions really happen?

Sadly, the answer to this is yes. In York in 1586, during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I (so less than 20 years before the events of the show), an English Catholic woman named Margaret Clitherow was crushed to death, for the crime of harbouring and aiding Catholic priests.

Like the character portrayed by Webber, she also refused to submit to a trial or to save herself by confessing – thereby preventing her children from being implicated in her crimes, or being tortured to try and ascertain her guilt. According to the History of York website, however, some of her relatives, including her stepfather, felt that her insistence on silence was “suicidal” in nature. The appalling harshness of the sentence itself, too, may have been intended as a deterrent, or as an incentive to confess.

Clitherow herself seems to have been prepared to die a martyr. "The sheriffs have said that I am going to die this coming Friday; and I feel the weakness of my flesh which is troubled at this news, but my spirit rejoices greatly. For the love of God, pray for me and ask all good people to do likewise,” she reportedly wrote to a friend ahead of her death.

During her execution, she was stripped naked, and, according to accounts from the time, made to lie on a sharp rock as a heavy door was placed on top of her body. Weights were then placed on top of this, until the pressure broke Clitherow’s back, leading to her death. She was in her early 30s at the time and, horrifyingly, may have been pregnant.


Lady Dorothy Dibdale (left) may have been inspired by Margaret Clitherow, shown here in a stained-glass portrait with Cardinal Newman

The decision to include a crushing scene like this in Gunpowder, along with the scene in which the young aspiring Catholic priest is hanged, drawn and quartered, was a deliberate one. Harington, who helped create the series, felt that it was necessary to show the very real oppression inflicted upon Catholics at the time.

"It was important for the story because right from the start we need to know why Robert Catesby embarks upon this very, very violent act,” he explained.

"At the time, Catholics were being persecuted and there is nothing in this which is not historically accurate. So we needed to see something quite violent from the start which makes us understand why this man might do what he does."

That said, it’s worth noting that the Clitherow case was an especially brutal one, even by the unforgiving standards of the time – and Clitherow herself was later canonized by the Catholic Church.

Furthermore, as previously mentioned, the execution took place while Elizabeth I was on the throne, rather than James I.

One key motivation for the Gunpowder Plot, however, was that Catholics such as Catesby had initially hoped that the new monarch (who came to power in England in 1603) would be more sympathetic to their cause than his predecessor – and were disappointed when the new strictures he put in place the following year suggested*that this was not the case.

Did Catholics really hide priests in secret compartments?

This was pretty common practice among Catholic families in Tudor times, following Henry VIII’s reformation and the measures taken against Catholics by his daughter Elizabeth I – and lots of country houses in England had (and still have) so-called priest holes installed for this very purpose. Many of these (as evidenced by a list on the*National Trust website) can still be seen today.

Who is the young nobleman implied to be in love with James I?

The character, played by the actor Hugh Alexander, is the courtier Sir Philip Herbert, a close companion of the King’s, who would have been present in court at the time the show is set, and who had many favours bestowed upon him by the monarch. James I is believed by many historians to have been gay or bisexual (or at least to have had a sexual/romantic interest in men, whether or not this involved physical sex), and is known to have had several male “favourites” throughout his life. The most famous of these, however, were Robert Carr, Earl of Somerset, and George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham, both of whom were not involved with the King in 1603-05.

Did the King really use a special royal toilet while in the same room as his associates?

Guarding the royal toilet, and, more generally, acting as a companion to the King while in his bedchamber and other private areas was a duty afforded to a lucky chosen few (including Sir Philip Herbert), who were honoured with the title “Gentlemen of the Bedchamber”.

Gunpowder fact vs fiction: how accurate is the BBC series?
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,927
1,910
113
Peter Hitchens


Smoke screen: Liv Tyler (left) plays a Roman Catholic rebel in Gunpowder smoke screen

Gunpowder’s blown real history to pieces

Ronan Bennett, writer of the new TV drama Gunpowder, about the Guy Fawkes plot, said in October 2000 that he would not turn in the Omagh bombers (who murdered 29 people) to the Royal Ulster Constabulary, if he knew who they were.

This is a historical fact, unlike many of the events shown in the drama itself. And I hope it causes you to wonder a bit about who and what this programme is for.

I am one of the last few surviving Englishmen who was brought up as a Protestant patriot, to revere the first Queen Elizabeth as our greatest monarch and Sir Francis Drake as the saviour of his country against the Armada in 1588.

How fortunate we were, I thought then, and think now.

Oddly enough, I was taught this period of our history by a proud Roman Catholic, an excellent teacher whose lessons I still recall more than 55 years later. There was no hint of bigotry in those lessons. Why should there have been? We were told that the Queen’s Roman Catholic subjects were, by the standards of their times, treated generously. The problem (here’s another fact) was that Pope Pius V had instructed them all in a decree of 1570 (‘Regnans in Excelsis’) to engage in treason against Queen Elizabeth, whom the Pope denounced as a ‘servant of crime’. And his church then sent priests into the country to foment that treason, allied with ever-present threats of foreign invasion.

Most English Roman Catholics sensibly ignored this foolish foreign plotting. Those few who sheltered such priests were (quite reasonably, in my view) considered equivalent to those who today shelter the agents of Islamic State.

They were not burned to death for holding to their faith, as Protestants had been under the appalling and intolerant Queen Mary I. The whole picture of the era in Gunpowder is wrong, including the fictional scene in which a woman is stripped naked before being crushed to death.

As for the graphic disembowelling of a captured priest, it is interesting that the BBC is ready to show this gruesome thing but remains reluctant to show the equally grisly truth about what happens in an abortion.

It is propaganda, which is why nearly all the major actors on the rebel side, such as Liv Tyler, are good-looking, and nearly all the main characters on the Protestant side are ugly or otherwise despicable.

I would love to know the process by which its interesting author came to be chosen.


BBC says it is guilty of not being left-wing enough! | Daily Mail Online










+1



The new BBC drama stars Kit Harington (left) and Liv Tyler (right). After the death of Elizabeth I, King James of Scotland claims the English throne, and the country goes to war with Catholic Spain and English Catholics are persecuted and driven into hiding in the series