I did answer your question but you keep ignoring it because it doesn't suit you. Very convenient on your part but not at all convincing.
http://hrw.org/reports/2006/lebanon0806/2.htm
[FONT=geneva,arial][SIZE=-1]Summary[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=geneva,arial][SIZE=-1]This report documents serious violations of international humanitarian law (the laws of war) by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in Lebanon between July 12 and July 27, 2006, as well as the July 30 attack in Qana. During this period, the IDF killed an estimated 400 people, the vast majority of them civilians, and that number climbed to over 500 by the time this report went to print. The Israeli government claims it is taking all possible measures to minimize civilian harm,
but the cases documented here reveal a systematic failure by the IDF to distinguish between combatants and civilians.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=geneva,arial][SIZE=-1]
Since the start of the conflict, Israeli forces have consistently launched artillery and air attacks with limited or dubious military gain but excessive civilian cost. In dozens of attacks, Israeli forces struck an area with no apparent military target. In some cases, the timing and intensity of the attack, the absence of a military target, as well as return strikes on rescuers, suggest that Israeli forces deliberately targeted civilians.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=geneva,arial][SIZE=-1]The Israeli government claims that it targets only Hezbollah, and that fighters from the group are using civilians as human shields, thereby placing them at risk.
Human Rights Watch found no cases in which Hezbollah deliberately used civilians as shields to protect them from retaliatory IDF attack. Hezbollah occasionally did store weapons in or near civilian homes and fighters placed rocket launchers within populated areas or near U.N. observers, which are serious violations of the laws of war because they violate the duty to take all feasible precautions to avoid civilian casualties. However, those cases do not justify the IDF’s extensive use of indiscriminate force which has cost so many civilian lives.
In none of the cases of civilian deaths documented in this report is there evidence to suggest that Hezbollah forces or weapons were in or near the area that the IDF targeted during or just prior to the attack.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=geneva,arial][SIZE=-1]By consistently failing to distinguish between combatants and civilians, Israel has violated one of the most fundamental tenets of the laws of war: the duty to carry out attacks on only military targets. The pattern of attacks during the Israeli offensive in Lebanon suggests that the failures cannot be explained or dismissed as mere accidents; the extent of the pattern and the seriousness of the consequences indicate the commission of war crimes.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=geneva,arial][SIZE=-1]This report is based on extensive on-the-ground research in Lebanon. Since the start of hostilities, Human Rights Watch has interviewed victims and witnesses of attacks in one-on-one settings, conducted on-site inspections (when security allowed), and collected information from hospitals, humanitarian groups, and government agencies. Human Rights Watch also conducted research in Israel, inspecting the IDF’s use of weapons and discussing the conduct of forces with IDF officials. The research was extensive, but given the ongoing war and the scope of the bombings, Human Rights Watch does not claim that the findings are comprehensive; further investigation is required to document the war’s complete impact on civilians and to assess the full scope of the IDF’s compliance with and disregard for international humanitarian law.[/SIZE][/FONT]
*********************************************************
Again, it
documents IDF violations but is still in the process of evaluating Hezbollah's actions. If it was in violation as was the IDF aggressors (remember, it was Israel who started the war) it should have reached the same conclusions by now. We have already discussed that distinction.
OWNED - AGAIN!
