Thanks? Yeah, pretty much that.
Tecumsehsbones Hall of Fame Member Mar 18, 2013 60,581 9,625 113 Washington DC Jun 24, 2016 #21 Corduroy said: Thanks? Click to expand... Yeah, pretty much that.
Jinentonix Hall of Fame Member Sep 6, 2015 11,619 6,262 113 Olympus Mons Jun 24, 2016 #22 Tecumsehsbones said: Next, the Aus-gang. After that, I'm all for the Texit. Aaaand. . . the Quebexit makes sense. Click to expand... Yes it does. Only in this case, the larger entity will be better off without the smaller entity.
Tecumsehsbones said: Next, the Aus-gang. After that, I'm all for the Texit. Aaaand. . . the Quebexit makes sense. Click to expand... Yes it does. Only in this case, the larger entity will be better off without the smaller entity.
lone wolf Grossly Underrated Nov 25, 2006 32,493 212 63 In the bush near Sudbury Jun 24, 2016 #23 I wanna see Ontario get a Torontectomy....
Tecumsehsbones Hall of Fame Member Mar 18, 2013 60,581 9,625 113 Washington DC Jun 24, 2016 #24 Jinentonix said: Yes it does. Only in this case, the larger entity will be better off without the smaller entity. Click to expand... You say that now, but JUST YOU WAIT until your life, bereft of Iles de la Madeleine, becomes a meaningless, futile, empty shell, mister!
Jinentonix said: Yes it does. Only in this case, the larger entity will be better off without the smaller entity. Click to expand... You say that now, but JUST YOU WAIT until your life, bereft of Iles de la Madeleine, becomes a meaningless, futile, empty shell, mister!