sj007's signature

What do you think of sj007's signature?

  • It's too long

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It's too long and makes the site look tacky

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It's too long and takes up my whole screen

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • What is that guy on in the pic????

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
On a serious note, I have mentioned something on a different thread, that the sig is too long and amkes the website looks tacky. Nothing against Sj007 but a sig must not be more than a simple statement.
 

Andem

dev
Mar 24, 2002
5,645
129
63
Larnaka
Re: RE: sj007's signature

moghrabi said:
On a serious note, I have mentioned something on a different thread, that the sig is too long and amkes the website looks tacky. Nothing against Sj007 but a sig must not be more than a simple statement.

I totally agree. We can't having this place look tacky.

I suppose we've reached a consensus.
 

Haggis McBagpipe

Walks on Forum Water
Jun 11, 2004
5,085
7
38
Victoria, B.C.
I think 007 is an awfully good sport for taking this so well. I liked DS's reason for removing the signature, it was valid, based on a logical reason, rather than based a personal judgement of what constitutes tackiness and 'what the neighbours might think'. I know, I know, this is all in fun. I just hope 007 knows it too.
 

Haggis McBagpipe

Walks on Forum Water
Jun 11, 2004
5,085
7
38
Victoria, B.C.
Re: RE: sj007's signature

Diamond Sun said:
Well exactly Haggis, if I can't post at work, what on earth am I supposed to do for 8 hours? :)

Work? No, that would be wrong. If you were forced to work, you could sue 007 for damages. :cool:

Rick, it is never too late. I suspect that 007 has great ability in the art of rebuilding signatures....