Scientists says photo evidence suggests water flowed recently on Mars

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com


By Alicia Chang

LOS ANGELES (AP) - After decades of scouring images of Mars for signs of water, scientists believe they have found stunning evidence that water may even now be flowing through the Red Planet's frigid surface.

The news excited scientists who hunt for extraterrestrial life. If the finding is confirmed, they say, all the ingredients favourable for life on Mars would be in place: liquid water and a stable heat source.

"This is a squirting gun for water on Mars," said Kenneth Edgett, a scientist at San Diego-based Malin Space Science Systems, which operates a camera on NASA's Mars Global Surveyor.

It was the Surveyor that prompted the announcement Wednesday by taking photographs of Mars before it lost contact with Earth last month. The latest findings will appear in Friday's issue of the journal Science.

The images do not actually show flowing water. Rather, they show changes in craters that provide the strongest evidence yet that water coursed through them as recently as several years ago, and is perhaps doing so even now.

In all of its Mars exploration missions, NASA has pursued a "follow the water" strategy to determine if the planet once contained life or could support it now.

Scientists believe ancient Mars was awash with pools of water. And at present-day Mars' north pole, researchers have spotted evidence of water ice. But they have yet to actually see water in liquid form.

"This underscores the importance of searching for life on Mars, either present or past," said Bruce Jakosky, an astrobiologist at the University of Colorado at Boulder, who had no role in the study. "It's one more reason to think that life could be there."

Some researchers were skeptical that liquid water was responsible for the surface feature changes seen by the spacecraft. They said other materials such as sand or dust can flow like a liquid and produce similar results.

"Nothing in the images, no matter how cool they are, proves that the flows were wet, or that they were anything more exciting than avalanches of sand and dust," Allan Treiman, a geologist at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston said in an e-mail.

The Global Surveyor previously spotted tens of thousands of gullies that scientists believed were geologically young and carved by fast-moving water coursing down cliffs and steep crater walls. Scientists decided to retake photos of thousands of gullies in a search for evidence of recent water activity.

Two craters in the southern hemisphere that were originally photographed in 1999 and 2001 were examined again in 2004 and 2005, and the images yielded changes consistent with water flowing down the crater walls, according to the study.

Scientists said five to 10 pools of water rushed down the craters in each case. In both craters, scientists found bright, light-coloured deposits several hundred metres long in gullies that weren't present in the original photos. They concluded that the deposits - possibly mud, salt or frost - were left there when water recently cascaded through.

Edgett said a combination of factors, including the shape and colour of the deposits, led the team to believe it was recent water action and not dust that slipped down the slope. He said dust would leave dark deposits.

Water cannot remain a liquid on Mars for long because of sub-zero surface temperatures and low atmospheric pressure that would turn water into ice or gas. But scientists theorize that liquid water is being shot up to the surface from an underground source, like geysers.

Mars formed more than 4.5 billion years ago and scientists generally believe it went through an early wet and warm era that ended after 1.5 billion to 2.5 billion years, leaving the planet extremely dry and cold.

"We're now realizing Mars is more active than we previously thought and that the mid-latitude section seems to be where all the action is," said Arizona State University scientist Phil Christensen, who was not part of the current research.
-
On the Net:
NASA: www.nasa.gov
Malin Space Science Systems: www.msss.com





Copyright © 2006 Canadian Press

 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
there is some media talk that this will stimulate exploration in Mars - dunno why as Martians have already landed here:


 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Make light of it all you want, that's the coolest news of the last 100 years. Mars is more active than we thought, there appears to be liquid water there, all life as we know it requires liquid water, maybe Mars has life somewhere, buried deep in hydrothermal vents. It's almost certain to be bacterial in nature if it's there, as is most life on earth, but still... Despite decades of speculation, searching, wishful thinking, fantasy, and whatnot, the only place in the cosmos we know there's life is here on earth, one planet out of eight. Wouldn't it be neat if we could say we've just doubled the probability of finding life in other stellar systems like ours? Google for "Drake equation" to see what that means.

Well, maybe few of you care. I think it's cool, but I've been a science nerd for 50 years...
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
LOL Gopher !!
I wonder what Jung would say about our little green men archetypes of the collective unconsious ?

Any psych majors out there ???

------------------------


Count me in too Dexter Sinister.

And more Mars missions are a lot more exciting than the shuttles to Intl Space Station,
in which such trips are highly expensive and highly dangerous. Anything that gets us
past the envelope of the atmosphere, a very dangerous area, I'm all for.

We still got two cars running around on Mars, staying alive much longer that expected.
 
Last edited:

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
For years, science fiction has speculated about life on Mars. Those speculations have, in the last few decades, tempered their enthusiasm as we learn more about the red planet. I have to admit that I was a bit disappointed when there was no sign of Barsoom or the ancient cities. The evidence of liquid water is certainly cause for a bit of excitement. Liquid water can support all manner of life. If we find only bacteria, it is still exciting because there is evidence that at one time there was much more water on that planet and who knows what life was held by the ancient seas.