Saddam Hussein Lawyers at disadvantage

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
AMMAN, Jordan - Saddam Hussein's lawyers are denied the same rights and resources as the prosecutors in his trial, a U.S.-based legal adviser to the deposed Iraqi leader said Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Curtis Doebbler said Saddam's legal team is at a disadvantage compared with the prosecution, which he said has spent $300 million and has "hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops and dozens of American lawyers to assist them."

"All these resources have been deployed to collect evidence for more than two years" to build a case against Saddam, he said in a statement e-mailed by the Jordan-based defense team to The Associated Press.

By contrast, Doebbler said, Saddam's defense team "consists of volunteer lawyers without adequate resources or the ability to find experts (or) adequate witnesses."

He said the defense cannot visit the sites of the alleged crimes "because of the state of insecurity in Iraq."

Saddam was deposed by the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. He went on trial in October 2005 along with seven members of his former regime on charges of killing 148 Shiites in the aftermath of an assassination attempt on the then-president in 1982.

Doebbler, a Washington-based law professor specializing in international law, said the non-Iraqi lawyers for the defense "cannot even enter Iraq to visit their clients regularly."

In Iraq, Saddam's attorneys are "held under virtual house arrest without access to telephones, faxes, computers, books, or any adequate facilities to do their work," he said. "Even their legal notes are read and only papers approved by American officials can be passed to their clients."

The legal team has complained that their papers were read during searches before they enter the court.

He rebuked human rights groups without citing any by name, saying they had failed to protest the conditions of Saddam's trial.

"It is quite incredible that the international community silently watches a process that continues to violate more and more human rights," he said.

"We have called to have the trial brought under United Nations auspices, but while everyone agrees that human rights are not being respected, they are too intimidated by the United States government to stand up for human rights."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060409...mJvaA8F;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Hussein • Mistrial

If there are circumstances to suggest that the Court proceedings of Saddam Hussein may have been conducted improperly, or that he was not given a fair trial, then a mistrial should be declared and a new Court should be assembled and conducted. Despite the despicable acts he is believed to have committed, he must be granted a fair trial.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Saddam Hussein Lawyers at a disadvantage

No kidding. Did anyone expect anything else? Saddam Hussein is a bastard, but this trial should have been held in the International Criminal Court..
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
Iraq never signed on the dotted line to be a part of the International Criminal court. Three hundred million dollars is alot of money spent, especially when a DU plated projectile worth $1 dollar could of done the job, wouldn't that be applicable under Sharia Law? Or is it hanging, I forget which.
 

Karlin

Council Member
Jun 27, 2004
1,275
2
38
Hey, speaking of UNFAIR, has any of you wondered why Saddam isn't getting up and saying things that will embarrass the USA?
{ Like how the USA gave Saddam the chemicals to kill those Kurds with, or that they installed Sadam as leader of Iraq in the first place.]

COULD IT BE THAT HE IS WEARING A STUN BELT???

Here is a link to another trial going on today, where a STUN BELT is purported to be being used:

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_665.shtml
Apr 5, 2006, 16:52
"Was Moussaoui outfitted with a hidden “stun belt” at trial?"
This stunning fact was a slip of the tongue on MSNBC's March 28 Abrams Report by NBC news reporter Pete Williams. He said he believed Zacarias Moussaoui was wearing a “stun belt” underneath his clothing and that same stun belt was controlled by US Marshals.

Wheeeee Hooooo!~
Karlin
 

LittleRunningGag

Electoral Member
Jan 11, 2006
611
2
18
Calgary, Alberta
members.shaw.ca
I think not said:
Iraq never signed on the dotted line to be a part of the International Criminal court.

If I remember correctly, neither has the US. It wouldn't really be appropriate for them to try him at the ICC if neither country has signed. Especially since this isn't a UN sanctioned action.
 

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
LittleRunningGag said:
I think not said:
Iraq never signed on the dotted line to be a part of the International Criminal court.

If I remember correctly, neither has the US. It wouldn't really be appropriate for them to try him at the ICC if neither country has signed. Especially since this isn't a UN sanctioned action.

You're correct and I agree. The ICC wouldn't (and hasn't) even looked at the case.