Report: U.S. Conducting Secret Missions Inside Iran

N

no1important

Time Out
Jan 9, 2003
4,125
0
36
56
Vancouver
members.shaw.ca
I was watching CNN this morning and they had Seymour Hersh on from the New Yorker and he believes his secret sources who told him America will drop bombs on Iran this summer in hope to start an uprising to throw out the leader.

Hersh said U.S. officials were involved in "extensive planning" for a possible attack -- "much more than we know."

"The goal is to identify and isolate three dozen, and perhaps more, such targets that could be destroyed by precision strikes and short-term commando raids," he wrote in "The New Yorker" magazine, which published his article in editions that will be on newsstands Monday.

here is the link. http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/16/hersh.iran/index.html

So I guess Bush has dreamed up a "crisis" for Iran. I think it will be a mistake as Iran is more organized than Saddam ever was and I think Iran has the means to retaliate if "W" is that stupid. Hell, The American troops are not that far from Iran so they could inflict a lot of damage on U.S. soldiers. I guess the draft will be back sooner than later, maybe?
 
N

no1important

Time Out
Jan 9, 2003
4,125
0
36
56
Vancouver
members.shaw.ca
I was watching CNN this morning and they had Seymour Hersh on from the New Yorker and he believes his secret sources who told him America will drop bombs on Iran this summer in hope to start an uprising to throw out the leader.

Hersh said U.S. officials were involved in "extensive planning" for a possible attack -- "much more than we know."

"The goal is to identify and isolate three dozen, and perhaps more, such targets that could be destroyed by precision strikes and short-term commando raids," he wrote in "The New Yorker" magazine, which published his article in editions that will be on newsstands Monday.

here is the link. http://www.cnn.com/2005/ALLPOLITICS/01/16/hersh.iran/index.html

So I guess Bush has dreamed up a "crisis" for Iran. I think it will be a mistake as Iran is more organized than Saddam ever was and I think Iran has the means to retaliate if "W" is that stupid. Hell, The American troops are not that far from Iran so they could inflict a lot of damage on U.S. soldiers. I guess the draft will be back sooner than later, maybe?
 
moghrabi

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
I hope Bush doesn't go that far. These Mullas in Iran are a bit crazier than him when it comes to war. You will see terrorist acts all over the planet. Iran is not Iraq. They are well organized and remind me of the secrecy of North Korea. We don't know what they have.
 
moghrabi

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
I hope Bush doesn't go that far. These Mullas in Iran are a bit crazier than him when it comes to war. You will see terrorist acts all over the planet. Iran is not Iraq. They are well organized and remind me of the secrecy of North Korea. We don't know what they have.
 
moghrabi

moghrabi

House Member
May 25, 2004
4,508
4
38
Canada
I hope Bush doesn't go that far. These Mullas in Iran are a bit crazier than him when it comes to war. You will see terrorist acts all over the planet. Iran is not Iraq. They are well organized and remind me of the secrecy of North Korea. We don't know what they have.
 
Karlin

Karlin

Council Member
Jun 27, 2004
1,275
2
38
Re: Iran is next - Conquest

Regardless of the cost, the number of available soldiers, or the need for it, Iran is next, and likely sooner than later.

"Changing the Leadership" of foriegn soveriegn nations is an affront to freedom and liberty, but U.S. foriegn policy aims to do just that in many nations, and many have allready "been done".

Iran is key to "changing the entire region's leadership", key to boinking down the Islamist rulers. So it will be done, or at least attempted.

The way to dealing with the shortage of troops is weaponry. Once the U.S. forces are overwhelmed, it will be 'arranged' that to protect the soldiers, bigger bombs will be used, maybe chemicals or nuclear weapons. It is likely that some sorts of biological agents are allready in use, to weaken the populations of Arab nations. They need only a few soldiers to do bombings.

Is it a World War of Religions, or is this merely economically motivated, for energy security and so on?

What it is NOT is for America's security. Thats where the arguements against invading Iran fall apart - such an invasion would raise the threat to America by inciting hatred. So looking deeper we see it is a war for other reasons, religion or economy, and therefore there is nothing to get in the way of invading Iran, it has to be done "for those reasons" [religion or oil].

The pattern of Afghanistan, Iraq, then Iran is that they are oil rich or for the stategically necessary pipelines to send "that oil to these markets". Also, all Islamist.
Other invasive U.S. foreign policy moves in socialist nations that want to nationalise their oil, like Argentina, indicate the war is for oil - "whatever it takes" to secure America's energy comes from oil.

Oil is the currency of the Elites's economy. Without oil being KING, the Elites would lose their control over 'all economies'. So oil supply, and the lack of alternatives to fossil fuels that actually make it to market due to various blockage strategies, mean the Elites will stay on top for awhile longer.

Bush is a minion for the Elites, as is America. There are many layers or power and control beyond what we see down here in the public realm. When Bush is told to invade Iran, he will. It doesn't need to make sense to us, because it is not for us.

Karlin
 
Karlin

Karlin

Council Member
Jun 27, 2004
1,275
2
38
Re: Iran is next - Conquest

Regardless of the cost, the number of available soldiers, or the need for it, Iran is next, and likely sooner than later.

"Changing the Leadership" of foriegn soveriegn nations is an affront to freedom and liberty, but U.S. foriegn policy aims to do just that in many nations, and many have allready "been done".

Iran is key to "changing the entire region's leadership", key to boinking down the Islamist rulers. So it will be done, or at least attempted.

The way to dealing with the shortage of troops is weaponry. Once the U.S. forces are overwhelmed, it will be 'arranged' that to protect the soldiers, bigger bombs will be used, maybe chemicals or nuclear weapons. It is likely that some sorts of biological agents are allready in use, to weaken the populations of Arab nations. They need only a few soldiers to do bombings.

Is it a World War of Religions, or is this merely economically motivated, for energy security and so on?

What it is NOT is for America's security. Thats where the arguements against invading Iran fall apart - such an invasion would raise the threat to America by inciting hatred. So looking deeper we see it is a war for other reasons, religion or economy, and therefore there is nothing to get in the way of invading Iran, it has to be done "for those reasons" [religion or oil].

The pattern of Afghanistan, Iraq, then Iran is that they are oil rich or for the stategically necessary pipelines to send "that oil to these markets". Also, all Islamist.
Other invasive U.S. foreign policy moves in socialist nations that want to nationalise their oil, like Argentina, indicate the war is for oil - "whatever it takes" to secure America's energy comes from oil.

Oil is the currency of the Elites's economy. Without oil being KING, the Elites would lose their control over 'all economies'. So oil supply, and the lack of alternatives to fossil fuels that actually make it to market due to various blockage strategies, mean the Elites will stay on top for awhile longer.

Bush is a minion for the Elites, as is America. There are many layers or power and control beyond what we see down here in the public realm. When Bush is told to invade Iran, he will. It doesn't need to make sense to us, because it is not for us.

Karlin
 
Karlin

Karlin

Council Member
Jun 27, 2004
1,275
2
38
Re: Iran is next - Conquest

Regardless of the cost, the number of available soldiers, or the need for it, Iran is next, and likely sooner than later.

"Changing the Leadership" of foriegn soveriegn nations is an affront to freedom and liberty, but U.S. foriegn policy aims to do just that in many nations, and many have allready "been done".

Iran is key to "changing the entire region's leadership", key to boinking down the Islamist rulers. So it will be done, or at least attempted.

The way to dealing with the shortage of troops is weaponry. Once the U.S. forces are overwhelmed, it will be 'arranged' that to protect the soldiers, bigger bombs will be used, maybe chemicals or nuclear weapons. It is likely that some sorts of biological agents are allready in use, to weaken the populations of Arab nations. They need only a few soldiers to do bombings.

Is it a World War of Religions, or is this merely economically motivated, for energy security and so on?

What it is NOT is for America's security. Thats where the arguements against invading Iran fall apart - such an invasion would raise the threat to America by inciting hatred. So looking deeper we see it is a war for other reasons, religion or economy, and therefore there is nothing to get in the way of invading Iran, it has to be done "for those reasons" [religion or oil].

The pattern of Afghanistan, Iraq, then Iran is that they are oil rich or for the stategically necessary pipelines to send "that oil to these markets". Also, all Islamist.
Other invasive U.S. foreign policy moves in socialist nations that want to nationalise their oil, like Argentina, indicate the war is for oil - "whatever it takes" to secure America's energy comes from oil.

Oil is the currency of the Elites's economy. Without oil being KING, the Elites would lose their control over 'all economies'. So oil supply, and the lack of alternatives to fossil fuels that actually make it to market due to various blockage strategies, mean the Elites will stay on top for awhile longer.

Bush is a minion for the Elites, as is America. There are many layers or power and control beyond what we see down here in the public realm. When Bush is told to invade Iran, he will. It doesn't need to make sense to us, because it is not for us.

Karlin
 
P

Paranoid Dot Calm

Council Member
Jul 6, 2004
1,142
0
36
Hide-Away Lane, Toronto
How Iran will fight back
By Kaveh L Afrasiabi
December 16, 2004
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL16Ak01.html

Iran Launches Biggest Ground Exercise Ever
December 06, 2004
http://www.menewsline.com/stories/2004/december/12_07_2.html

Venezuela, Iran to sign cooperative agreements
December 30, 2004
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1104376739151

Iran's New Alliance With China Could Cost U.S. Leverage
By Robin Wright
November 17, 2004
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55414-2004Nov16.html?nav=hcmodule

Edit:

Here is another good link for Middle East news

Mosaic
A daily compilation of news reports from more than 15 countries in the Middle East including, Egypt, Lebanon, Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, and Iran, among others.
http://linktv.org
 
P

Paranoid Dot Calm

Council Member
Jul 6, 2004
1,142
0
36
Hide-Away Lane, Toronto
How Iran will fight back
By Kaveh L Afrasiabi
December 16, 2004
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL16Ak01.html

Iran Launches Biggest Ground Exercise Ever
December 06, 2004
http://www.menewsline.com/stories/2004/december/12_07_2.html

Venezuela, Iran to sign cooperative agreements
December 30, 2004
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1104376739151

Iran's New Alliance With China Could Cost U.S. Leverage
By Robin Wright
November 17, 2004
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55414-2004Nov16.html?nav=hcmodule

Edit:

Here is another good link for Middle East news

Mosaic
A daily compilation of news reports from more than 15 countries in the Middle East including, Egypt, Lebanon, Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, and Iran, among others.
http://linktv.org
 
P

Paranoid Dot Calm

Council Member
Jul 6, 2004
1,142
0
36
Hide-Away Lane, Toronto
How Iran will fight back
By Kaveh L Afrasiabi
December 16, 2004
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL16Ak01.html

Iran Launches Biggest Ground Exercise Ever
December 06, 2004
http://www.menewsline.com/stories/2004/december/12_07_2.html

Venezuela, Iran to sign cooperative agreements
December 30, 2004
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1104376739151

Iran's New Alliance With China Could Cost U.S. Leverage
By Robin Wright
November 17, 2004
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55414-2004Nov16.html?nav=hcmodule

Edit:

Here is another good link for Middle East news

Mosaic
A daily compilation of news reports from more than 15 countries in the Middle East including, Egypt, Lebanon, Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, and Iran, among others.
http://linktv.org
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom