Princeton professor cancels free speech class after students walk out over racial slu

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,928
3,590
113
Princeton professor cancels free speech class after students walk out over racial slurs in lecture
Associated Press
More from Associated Press
Published:
February 13, 2018
Updated:
February 13, 2018 2:03 PM EST
In this stock photo, students sit in a university lecture hall.Getty Images
TRENTON, N.J. — A Princeton University professor has cancelled a course on cultural freedoms and hate speech after his use of a racial slur in a teaching exercise led some students to walk out.
Colleagues say Professor Emeritus Lawrence Rosen has often used the slur during lectures on free speech. They say this is the first time he’s received such a negative response from students.
Lawrence Rosen (Princeton University)
A small group of students walked out of Rosen’s anthropology class on Feb. 6 after he used the slur three times.
What is worse, a white man punching a black man, or a white man calling a black man a n----r?
Prof. Lawrence Rosen
He refused a demand from several students to apologize and argued with at least one student. Two students later filed a complaint.
The university issued a statement defending Rosen, noting that “values of free speech and inclusivity are central” to the school’s mission and “critical to the education we provide.”
Princeton professor cancels free speech class after students walk out over racial slurs in lecture | Toronto Sun
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
Princeton professor cancels free speech class after students walk out over racial slurs in lecture
Associated Press
More from Associated Press
Published:
February 13, 2018
Updated:
February 13, 2018 2:03 PM EST
In this stock photo, students sit in a university lecture hall.Getty Images
TRENTON, N.J. — A Princeton University professor has cancelled a course on cultural freedoms and hate speech after his use of a racial slur in a teaching exercise led some students to walk out.
Colleagues say Professor Emeritus Lawrence Rosen has often used the slur during lectures on free speech. They say this is the first time he’s received such a negative response from students.
Lawrence Rosen (Princeton University)
A small group of students walked out of Rosen’s anthropology class on Feb. 6 after he used the slur three times.
What is worse, a white man punching a black man, or a white man calling a black man a n----r?
Prof. Lawrence Rosen
He refused a demand from several students to apologize and argued with at least one student. Two students later filed a complaint.
The university issued a statement defending Rosen, noting that “values of free speech and inclusivity are central” to the school’s mission and “critical to the education we provide.”
Princeton professor cancels free speech class after students walk out over racial slurs in lecture | Toronto Sun

Oh this is just a TYPICAL example of LIE-beral editing of truth and reality! LIE-berals want to discuss many contentious issues- BUT- ONLY ON THEIR TERMS!

Black Lives Matter bigots and their Antifa allies do not care for truth and logic. Consider this:


Here is an article illustrating just how messed up and convoluted is the black mind set in North America. With some comments of my own in brackets):

LARRY ELDER: Black-on-black racism at Cornell.

Published: November 12, 2017. Updated: November 13, 2017 8:05 AM EST

Filed Under: Toronto SUN/ Opinion/ Columnists

A Rasmussen poll taken in 2013 asked American adults, “Are most white Americans racist?” “Are most Hispanic Americans racist?” and “Are most black Americans racist?” Of the three groups, the winner was blacks.

Thirty-seven percent said most blacks were racist; 18% felt most Hispanics were racist; and 15% said most whites were racist.

Thirty-eight percent of whites felt most blacks were racist. Even blacks agreed, with 31% saying most blacks were racist, while 24% of blacks thought most whites racist and 15% believed most Hispanics were racist.

This brings us to the Cornell University’s Black Students United and whether the organization is engaging in racism — against blacks. The BSU complains that the prestigious Ivy League school admits too many blacks — from Africa and the Caribbean. “We demand that Cornell Admissions come up with a plan to actively increase the presence of under represented Black students on this campus,” the BSU student group said in its demands. “We define under represented Black students as Black Americans who have several generations (more than two) in this country.”

Hold the phone. Isn’t the mantra of modern higher education “diversity,” “inclusion” and “overcoming disadvantage?” If so, the black African and Caribbean students would seem to nail all three.

(Well yes- that IS the mantra- too bad it is FAILING! I recently spotted an article detailing the utter failure of Black high school kids in Baltimore and the statistics were appalling! Out of thousands of “graduates” only a very small handful could pass the standard tests for either math or literacy! But they got those high school diplomas anyway! It makes a farce of educational standards when total failure is ignored! And it looks even worse when these ignorant clods are invited to a graduation ceremony and awarded diplomas whose words they cannot read or spell! American Blacks have decided that getting an education means selling out to white society! No wonder Yankees have so much trouble with Blacks whio simply cannot manage properly in modern society!)

Maybe the problem is that it is tough to explain why so many black foreign applicants outperform America-born blacks on what some call “culturally biased” standardized tests. A 2007 study by Princeton and University of Pennsylvania sociologists examined the standardized test scores of black students enrolled at 28 selective universities. As to the SAT, the test most colleges use as an important factor in offering admission, the study found that foreign-born black college-bound students earned a statistically significant advantage on SAT scores, averaging a score of 1,250 (out of 1,600) compared to 1,193 average points for their American black counterparts. This explains, in large part, why first- or second-generation black immigrants made up 27 % of the black student bodies at colleges nationwide. In the Ivy League, black immigrants comprised 41% of black students.

(What it says is that Blacks from other lands DO understand thet value of education for THEIR FUTURE benefit and make full use of school opportunities! While Yankee born Blacks are allowed into colleges and universities under an affirmative action policy that actually humiliates them by setting them up for failure! These Yankee born Blacks cannot do the work of a high school student so they flounder badly at higher educational levels- and blame white racists for their failures!)

What is the basis for the black students’ protest? Don’t black foreigners face even more obstacles? After all, America spends more on education, K through 12, than the top 34 industrialized countries save Switzerland, Austria, Norway and Luxembourg. New York City and Washington, D.C., annually spend approximately $21,000 and $15,000 per student, respectively.

BSU might want to consider the letter to the editor of The Wall Street Journal written by a man from Congo: “I grew up in the Congo and have numerous friends in the U.S. from the Congo and other African countries who are here for an education or a better life. Every one of them is grateful for the opportunity to secure an excellent education. … Most come here from different cultures with minimal money and limited English language skills. Interestingly, I’ve never heard one complain about discrimination, obstacles or being a victim. Rather, they are grateful. Juxtapose this with Cornell’s Black Students United (BSU) whose members feel they should be treated better than every other color or race if they have ancestors who’ve been here for more than two generations.

(This is the bitter and foolish fruit that LIE-berals - with their lust for power at any price have planted! In their rush to buy votes- LIE-berals have offered up policies and positions that are insane- and foolish Blakc people have bought into the insanity! It is so much easier to blame others for your failures- rather than to own them yourself!)

“The counterintuitive posturing of American blacks denying other blacks from Africa or the Caribbean is appalling. First-generation African or Caribbean students have more obstacles to overcome to get into any university, much less a prestigious one like Cornell. Furthermore, the liberal American blacks who worship at the altar of ‘diversity’ and ‘victimhood’ should welcome real Africans or Caribbeans versus seeking preferences for those American blacks who truly have the superior advantage of having grown up in the U.S.

“If my Congolese friends are grateful for their opportunities here and have more challenges to overcome, why should American blacks get special treatment? Call this action what it is: racism. And it’s being pushed and protected under the guise of alleged victimization and preferential treatment at the expense of others of all colors and walks of life. So I challenge the BSU folks to start focusing on the concept of succeeding in life instead of always dwelling on the idea that the system is rigged against them.”

(NO doubt LIE-berals object to wealthy Black people sending their kids to Yankee schools to embarrass Yankee Blacks! But LIE-berals are caught here- universities and colleges across North America have caught the same bug-selling education to foreign students at much higher tuition rates to raise MORE GRAVY for civil service union Hogs- and since LIE-berals rely so very heavily on support from both Hogs and Black people it means LIE-beral hands are tied! LIE-berals are now committed to pumping out Fake News about systemic racists as a way to distract us from TOTAL Black failure and to save LIE-beral votes!)

The black immigrant culture rejects the victicrat mentality embraced by so many American blacks. In The Triple Package, a 2014 book about immigrants’ children, a son of Nigerian-born parents says, “If you start thinking about or becoming absorbed in the mentality that the whole system is against us, then you cannot succeed.”

Rather than complain about the success of foreign-born blacks, why not give failing urban schools some competition through vouchers to give parents greater choice in where to educate their children, a policy currently pushed by the Trump administration? In the Detroit public school district, for example, just 7% of eighth-graders are proficient or better in reading and just 4% are sufficient or better in math, despite total expenditures per student of over $18,000, according to the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress tests.

Isn’t this the real problem?

Larry Elder is a best-selling author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host.

(Yes! Black failure and unwillingness to do what is necessary to integrate into white society IS Entirely the problem! Once an employer has a few Black failures come through his shop- with boss getting a good look at the illiteracy in even basic math and spelling- it is not hard to see why Blacks cannot get jobs- if you cannot do the most basic literacy tasks you will NOT be hired- ever! And that is not racism- it is commons sense in the business world!)
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
What a pussy.

He should have done the speech and posted it on youtube.
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,330
4,028
113
Edmonton
I agree with spilledthebeer. However, that opinion in and of itself would be considered racist which is it not. The truth hurts sometimes but not saying it isn't going to make things better.


Poor students - so easily offended when the class is actually about free speech. This is exactly what I was referring to in the "Carbon Tax Thread" about millennials drinking the progressive cool aide. One can't even DISCUSS what is offensive or not offensive without being hijacked by these hypocrites. Unbelievable!


JMHO
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
The times have changed and what is acceptable to old people is not acceptable to young people.

For instance a woman who I could have raped in the 1970s with impunity now has a granddaughter who I cannot rape without having to explain myself.

The good old days are gone, hopefully.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
I agree, but it's the only thing the free speech debate centres around. In the past it was about criticizing the government or religion. Now it's just shouting the N-word.
 

YoungCDNGuy

New Member
Feb 15, 2018
25
0
1
Wait so did he completely cancel the course or just end the class? Glad that the school is standing up for him (surprisingly) and that is quite an interesting dilemma he presented to weed out the sensitive ones
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,557
8,152
113
B.C.
The times have changed and what is acceptable to old people is not acceptable to young people.

For instance a woman who I could have raped in the 1970s with impunity now has a granddaughter who I cannot rape without having to explain myself.

The good old days are gone, hopefully.
Why would you want to rape a woman in 1970 ? Or any other time for that matter ?
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36


Here is an article illustrating just how messed up the LIE-beral version of justice has become. With some comments of my own in brackets):

How Alberta justice system is tackling 'complete breakdown' that led to shackling, jailing of sex assault victim

Edmonton Journal: By Paige Parsons & Juris Graney & Jonny Wakefield


An independent report into the treatment of an incarcerated, shackled sexual assault victim released by Alberta Justice in February called the Indigenous woman’s experience a “complete breakdown” of legal protections. It called for 18 changes to Alberta’s justice system. Postmedia reporters looked deeper into three of those recommendations.

Organizations that work with victims of crime in Edmonton say they are open to change in how services are delivered, in the wake of a report that was highly critical of how Alberta treats victims.

An independent review into the case of a sexual assault survivor who was jailed to ensure she testified against her attacker recommended a “complete overhaul” of Alberta’s victim services system, including centralizing victims services and taking the work out of the hands of police.

(And there is the rotten heart of the LIE-beral justice system! A homeless woman with a history of drug abuse made a complaint of sexual assault against a man. That man was investigated and charged with the assault- so far so good. The PROBLEM IS that the woman making the allegations is A FLAKE- drug addled and homeless- with NO guarantee that she would show up at a trial to testify! So the woman was jailed to ensure cops could produce her at the trial instead of simply releasing her and letting her wander off to a crack house or alley way!)

(LIE-berals who criticise cops for treating the woman like a criminal IGNORE the reality- that SHE IS a criminal! Using hard core drugs IS a crime! PERJURY ALSO is a crime! You cannot simply wander into a cop station and make an allegation of sexual assault and walk away! Assault is a serious crime- even for hug a thug LIE-beral judges! The accused has the right to a trial- honest-fair and logical! But how can there be a trial if there is NO witness for the prosecution? How can a man be convicted if there is no accuser? How can an innocent person clear their name if there is no trial? What do cops do with the guy if there is no trial? Should cops simply release the guy? LIE-berals insist they are feminists and assault is a serious crime and they would be unhappy if an accused rapist was simply released- free to go his merry way- maybe to molest other women? Clearly for the sake of justice and the safety of the community THERE MUST be a trial! So the victim was jailed to ensure she would testify!)

(And why shackle her? How about: SHE IS A DRUG ADDICT! Shall we ask if she did not like being in jail and was looking for a chance to run away and score some crack? And if she does run away then we are back to that question of “how can there be a trial”?)

(On a related note- in summer 2017- LIE-beral hug a thug judges RELEASED SEVEN ACCUSED KILLERS simply because they could not guarantee a trial for each in a reasonable time! So how can LIE-berals not treat an accused rapist in similar fashion- give a trial or drop the charges? And there can be NO trial without the witness- so she was held! Only a LIE-beral stupidly pandering to feminiazi radical voters would see a problem with this victim being held in jail!)

Police and the Bissell Centre are the two primary groups in Edmonton with workers who help victims navigate the court system, connect them with resources and serve as advocates in the aftermath of a crime.

“It is clear the intent of the recommendations … is to enhance and strengthen the level of support provided to victims of crime,” EPS’ Victim Services Unit Insp. Trent Forsberg said in an email.

“A provincially centralized model would seem to indicate increased equity and consistency of services to all communities across the province. Any strategy that is designed to improve the level of service provided to victims is clearly supported by the EPS.”

Roberta Campbell, the criminal defence lawyer hired to review how the province’s justice system failed the woman in 2015, wrote in her Feb. 23 report that the province’s victim services system shares much of the blame.

“The authors are of the opinion that the current model of victim services in Alberta is wholly inadequate to address the needs of victims,” Campbell wrote.

“More so than any other factor … the lack of appropriate victim services led to the incarceration of (the woman).”

(“:Appropriate victim services”? What service is needed? Other than to guarantee she would show for and testify at the sex assault trial that SHE TRIGGERED!)

The Indigenous woman, whose name is covered by a publication ban, was homeless and living on the streets of Edmonton when she was sexually assaulted by Lance Blanchard on June 16, 2014. She was 27 at the time.

During Blanchard’s court-ordered preliminary inquiry, the woman was taken into custody because the Crown prosecutor and judge believed she was “a flight risk.”

She was not referred to the police service’s victim services unit and had no contact with any victim support worker in the year between her assault and the preliminary inquiry, Campbell wrote.

(And shall we ask if she had refused to cooperate with “victim services”? Perhaps like so many drug addicted and homeless women she was working in the sex trade and simply refused to talk to social workers? LIE-berals excel at cherry picking through facts to present us with a pretty picture that too often has NO relationship to reality!)

“For such a serious criminal charge, and for such a vulnerable victim, it is difficult to imagine how this could be the case,” Campbell wrote.

She also was shackled while giving testimony and was twice transported between the Edmonton Remand Centre and the courthouse in the same van as Blanchard. Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Eric Macklin later made scathing remarks about her treatment in his written decision convicting Blanchard.

The woman died in an unrelated shooting on Dec. 12, 2015.

(Oh? She died in an unrelated shooting? Would that be related to a drug deal gone bad or sex trade business gone sour? LIE-berals do NOT think we are entitled to know the full truth! The woman is a person entitled to some respect- but only a LIE-beral would try to handle this woman as if she was a middle class, sober, serious minded soccer Mom just doing some slumming! The victim lived a life of chaos and confusion- that is how you get to be homeless and drug addicted- but only a LIE-beral would call the woman entirely blameless! And only a LIE-beral would blame cops for handling the matter in a logical and efficient way that is fair to ALL parties!)

In Edmonton, most victim services workers are volunteers with the police service’s Victim Services Unit (VSU).

Campbell was critical of the system, writing that “the support provided by VSU generally consists of a single phone call, to refer victims to other community and counselling programs in Edmonton.” That system is “essentially the same” as Edmonton’s 211 hotline which connects callers with mental health services, she wrote.

(In other words the woman DID get offered victim services but apparently CHOSE NOT to use them! Hard core addicts want more drugs- NOT counseling!)

Campbell noted the VSU had just 112 volunteers and nine staffers for a city of over 900,000 people. The unit recently centralized its services to a single office, which led a number of longtime volunteers to leave. Police say there are now 66 volunteers, a decrease of around 40 per cent.

The Bissell Centre, a service agency in Edmonton’s core, employs two victim service workers catering to marginalized populations.

Alberta’s Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General said it is taking steps to implement two of Campbell’s recommendations, including creating a class of court workers to help victims navigate the justice system, and hiring Indigenous victim services and court workers “specifically trained to address the needs of Indigenous victims and witnesses.”

(That` nice- and it’s a typical LIE-beral solution- throw money at the problem till it chokes and dies! But it DOES NOT ADDRESS the central issue: how to ensure a drug addled hooker shows up for the trial? Unless she is JAILED?)

Campbell also recommended Alberta follow Manitoba’s lead and “centralize” victim services under the justice ministry, with government funding for victim service workers in communities across the province.

And she suggested separating victims services from Edmonton police and the RCMP because vulnerable victims often “have a distrust or aversion to police.”

The government is studying both proposals.

(Uh-huh- I am sure LIE-berals ARE studying the proposals in detail! Trying to figure out how to win more native votes- WITHOUT- at the same time pissing off ordinary Cdns already enraged by LIE-beral hug a thug judges antics!)

Rob Sipes, a victim support worker with the Bissell Centre who spent 18 years with the VSU, said he “by and large” supports the recommended changes, but felt Campbell’s report belittled the work of victim services volunteers and their training.

(And just HOW would victim services support workers have ensured that the woman showed up for a trial? Would they have assigned a team of workers- from their already short staffed group- to FOLLOW this woman everywhere till the trial date and then called the cops to come pick her up? You cannot simply put this woman up in the nearest hotel because she is going to wander off on a drug and alcohol fueled binge! Or maybe get thrown out for conducting sex trade business that disturbs the other tenants? Jail resolves the chaotic life- till the trial! )

“The way it was written, it sounds like people just (do) it as a casual hobby,” he said.

(The way it was written suggests to me that victim services are staffed by airheads! And their supporters are something WORSE!)