Prince Harry and the Lapdancers.

cortezzz

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2006
663
0
16
humm
what you are suggesting is test them all!!!!
great idea

that could be the billion dollar tabloid story
have a bunch of spies surrepticiously recover dna samples from all members of the royal family---- a few hairs from each-- and no i dont mean pubic hairs--
have them all tested

find out who the bastards really are!!!!

and publish it world wide

jolly good
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Re: RE: Prince Harry and the Lapdancers.

cortezzz said:
humm
what you are suggesting is test them all!!!!
great idea

that could be the billion dollar tabloid story
have a bunch of spies surrepticiously recover dna samples from all members of the royal family---- a few hairs from each-- and no i dont mean pubic hairs--
have them all tested

find out who the bastards really are!!!!

and publish it world wide

jolly good


Your not mentally stable are you?
 

fuzzylogix

Council Member
Apr 7, 2006
1,204
7
38
The answer is- they are commoners.

There is no such thing as Royal blood. These are people just like you and me whose ancestors happened to have killed off or successfully fought off the opposition. To think they are any different to us is absurd. All of them are marrying commoners because all of them are commoners. Period.
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Re: RE: Prince Harry and the Lapdancers.

fuzzylogix said:
The answer is- they are commoners.

There is no such thing as Royal blood. These are people just like you and me whose ancestors happened to have killed off or successfully fought off the opposition. To think they are any different to us is absurd. All of them are marrying commoners because all of them are commoners. Period.

Well yes and know if you study feudal Europe you will see how this system was made and why. But you are right of course nothing makes these people special but the whole ignorant belief in neo-romanticism.
 

cortezzz

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2006
663
0
16
Re: RE: Prince Harry and the Lapdancers.

Finder said:
cortezzz said:
humm
what you are suggesting is test them all!!!!
great idea

that could be the billion dollar tabloid story
have a bunch of spies surrepticiously recover dna samples from all members of the royal family---- a few hairs from each-- and no i dont mean pubic hairs--
have them all tested

find out who the bastards really are!!!!

and publish it world wide

jolly good


Your not mentally stable are you?

how is that scenario a product of mental instability
if they wanna be tampons --then anything goes

and thanks for the compliment
 

cortezzz

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2006
663
0
16
you know-- the prince of wales wanting to be horsefaces tampon a few years ago

what is so weird about that dna story--
the tabloid press frequently insinuates that such and such are illigetimate -- why not prove it scientifically
i suppose with todays technology-- one could argue anyone with pretensions to the throne must prove their pure royal blood line -- via a simple dna test

im a surreallist-- a dadist-- not crasy
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Re: RE: Prince Harry and the Lapdancers.

cortezzz said:
you know-- the prince of wales wanting to be horsefaces tampon a few years ago

what is so weird about that dna story--
the tabloid press frequently insinuates that such and such are illigetimate -- why not prove it scientifically
i suppose with todays technology-- one could argue anyone with pretensions to the throne must prove their pure royal blood line -- via a simple dna test

im a surreallist-- a dadist-- not crasy

Do you mean Dataist?

I'm a Deist, but those are two different things. heh. *am really tired*
 

cortezzz

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2006
663
0
16
no not data ist
but dada-ist
as in DADA
ie--- that early 2oth century absurdist art movement that was actually a precursur to surreallism
they used to meet -- i think in zurich at a night club called the cabaret voltaire and enact absurdist plays and diatribes-- some of which mocked the -- great war that was raging at the time

deist-- you mean you believe in a god-- but not necessarily one represented in the popular religions of the day-- ie an abstract god---
thats cool

sometimes extreme states such as starvation dehyration etc----or in your case can bring enlightenment
many so called religious visions and revelations occur to be people in such states--

so if you keep up your shift work you may one day recieve a special communication from your god
let me know when you do

ask him if he is a socialist or not
 

Doryman

Electoral Member
Nov 30, 2005
435
2
18
St. John's
Who cares if Harry went to a lapdance club? I'd be much more worried if he was a recently graduated Army officer who didn't go out to get drunk and see strippers with his buddies, even if he was gay. I'm glad to see that at least one Royal is acting like what he is, a completely average, normal human being.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,192
1,932
113
Finder said:
However I am a Social Democratic Republican and I don't really see the need for a royal family.

Because it beats being a Republic?
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Blackleaf said:
Finder said:
However I am a Social Democratic Republican and I don't really see the need for a royal family.

Because it beats being a Republic?


I'd have to disagree with you but BlackLeaf I am not a radical republican and I'm happy living in Canada with our current traditions I just think a Republican system is better however. I think both Republican movements in the UK and Canada are to extreme, in fact the main republican movement in Canada was founded by Americans, and sponcered by Americans. A constitutional monarchy is fine but I would however like a second elected head of state.


cortezzz, yeah thats what I meant and I kind of just caught onto that. I can't say I support that movement but it is at least interesting. Oh and yes, generally thats what a desist is. Though you are missing one thing or at least kinda mixed it up with agnostic a little bit too much. Deists believe in a religion, islam, christianity or whatever in general, they believe in that good, in which created the universe and then pretty much left it to run. Like a watch maker makes a watch and allows it to run without tinkering with it. so generally, People like Pat Bukhane(sp) piss me off.
 

Johnny Utah

Council Member
Mar 11, 2006
1,434
1
38
Re: RE: Prince Harry and the Lapdancers.

Machjo said:
tracy said:
I don't see the big deal. How many adults have never seen a stripper?

And tracy, you're a woman, too? :?
Women see strippers, ever seen Women at strip clubs looking at strippers? It doesn't mean their lesbians, a Woman's body is a Work of Art and Women can also appreciate it. :D
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,192
1,932
113
Finder said:
Blackleaf said:
Finder said:
However I am a Social Democratic Republican and I don't really see the need for a royal family.

Because it beats being a Republic?


I'd have to disagree with you but BlackLeaf I am not a radical republican and I'm happy living in Canada with our current traditions I just think a Republican system is better however. I think both Republican movements in the UK and Canada are to extreme, in fact the main republican movement in Canada was founded by Americans, and sponcered by Americans. A constitutional monarchy is fine but I would however like a second elected head of state.

I've already shown on this forum that of the 10 most demcoratic nation in the world, 8 are Constitutional Monarchies.

And the Governments and politicians of Republics are very corrupt. Compared to France, Italy, Germany and the United States, British politics is very clean.
 

fuzzylogix

Council Member
Apr 7, 2006
1,204
7
38
Oh stuff a sock in it Blackleaf. British politics is not clean. For heavens sake, man, stop deluding yourself.
 

cortezzz

Electoral Member
Apr 8, 2006
663
0
16
the Uk is the most corrupt and backward country in europe
blackleaf knows it too----
hes symptomatic of post colonial decline
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,192
1,932
113
Re: RE: Prince Harry and the Lapdancers.

fuzzylogix said:
Oh stuff a sock in it Blackleaf. British politics is not clean. For heavens sake, man, stop deluding yourself.

Compared to Germany, Italy, France and the US, with all their corruption, it's clean, and they are all republics. Britain is in the Top 10 least corrupt nations on Earth.

Even Canada is more corrupt than Britain.

Corruption rank (the lower the number, the less corrupt)



Finland ..1 (Republic)
Denmark ..3 (Monarchy)
New Zealand ..1 (Monarchy)
Sweden.. 5 (Monarchy)
Switzerland.. 6 (Republic)
Norway.. 7 (Monarchy)
Netherlands ..10 (Monarchy)
Australia ..8 (Monarchy)
United Kingdom 10 (Monarchy)
Canada ..12 (Monarchy)
Austria.. 9 (Republic)
Germany ..13 (Republic)
Belgium ..16 (Monarchy)
Ireland ..16 (Republic)
United States ..14 (Republic)
France.. 15 (Republic)

http://www.worldaudit.org/democracy.htm

By my calculations, of the ten least corrupt, seven of them are Constitutional Monarchies (with UK and Netherlands joint 10th) and only three are Republics.

And, on the same forum, you will see that out of the 10 most democratic nations on Earth, 8 are Constitutional Monarchies.

So, if you want Canada to become a Republic, go ahead.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,192
1,932
113
World's 16 most democratic nations.

Finland.. 1 (Republic)
Denmark.. 2 (Monarchy)
New Zealand ..3 (Monarchy)
Sweden.. 4 (Monarchy)
Switzerland.. 5 (Republic)
Norway ..6 (Monarchy)
Netherlands ..7 (Monarchy)
Australia.. 8 (Monarchy)
United Kingdom.. 9 (Monarchy)
Canada ..10 (Monarchy)
Austria ..11 (Republic)
Germany ..12 (Republic)
Belgium ..13 (Monarchy)
Ireland ..14 (Republic)
United States ..14 (Republic)
France ..16 (Republic)

www.worldaudit.org


Look at all those Monarchies in the Top 10 - EIGHT of them, and 4 of those have Queen Elizabeth II as their Monarch.

So how is living in a Republic "better" than living in a Constitutional Monarchy?