Prove it wrong or get over it.
That you didn't say what I quoted?
Prove it wrong or get over it.
If you can't figure it out, I guess it hardly matters if I say it again, eh?what is it that I'm supposed to prove wrong? what you said about immigration?
If you can't figure it out, I guess it hardly matters if I say it again, eh?
And your point would be?hmmm
its a toss-up between your personal attack or your position on the impact of immigration on Canada's debt load. since personal attacks aren't allowed in this forum I gotta figure its your remark about immigration.
since you already said you stand by it that's all I was asking. I just wanted to hear you say it is all.
You didn't have to, I could here the sobbing from here.did I say I give a rat's ass about the personal attack?
...If that is so, why did you mention it?...
...I may be atad presumptuous, but I suspect that you may think I have a problem with immagration. That would not be the case...
And I do, I didn't say I stood by your mistake!but you already said you stand by your claim
Then what is you point?I didn't say anything about immigration one way or the other.
Say what?:wave:
I believe it was a Provincial contract handed out to a firm of their choosing, but I will hold out on trying to rub that in anyones face, until I confirm it. The only thing resembling 'poppycock' is your reading of that part of the list, it says the handling of the issue. Are you going to tell me that you think they handled it correctly?
No, but they sure as hell perfected it!!!
What? And ignore all the glorious benefits of the Liberal Empire? No way, I like the way they look in the light, stuck to the coackroack sticky paper.
:sleepy4: What did I tell you about throwing empty pistols at me. Just because you do it everytime someone brings up the waste and corruption throughout the Liberal regime, doesn't make the Liberals any better. This and bitwhys silly lil number, hardly compares to the unrepentant corruption of the Liberal regime. If we were only talking numbers, ya, I'ld have to agree somewhat, but the Liberals bear some responsiblity too, read on.
I would agree. But bulrooney was forced to create it. The Liberal regime that flung open the doors of immagration, without the infrastructure in place to deal with it, bears some of the responsiblity, don't you think?
Come right and say what?I find it interesting you think the impact of immigration on national debt is worthy of mention, that's all.
unless, of course, you choose to continue to hide behind rhetoric and don't have what it takes to say it straight out.
Come right and say what?
No I think he failed to impliment the proper infrastructure to cope with it. Immagration itself would have not been an issue, had all the appropriate infrastructure been in place, for the increased demad, prior to the Liberals leaving office, they would have had to bear full responsiblity for the cost. But seeing as they left office, with an immagration system in place that was not beefed up to accomidate the increase in numbers and thus needs, it was left to the consevatives.do you or do you not think Trudeau's immigration policy had a significant impact on the national debt?