http://www.cbc.ca/story/science/national/2006/05/15/polar-bears.html
And I suppose he is right about the "poster-species" status of polar bears as posted on Suzuki's site in the "species at risk" section.
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Impacts/ImperilledEcosystems/Speciesatrisk.asp
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Impacts/ImperilledEcosystems/
Why would the seals be thinner....I don't know. Maybe it's because there aren't enough polar bears to eat?
Polar bears are becoming the poster-species for "doomsday prophets" of climate change, even though groups pushing for higher protection for the animals don't have the evidence to prove their case, Nunavut's manager of wildlife says.
Taylor noted the estimated number of bears on the Boothia Peninsula, 1,300 kilometres west of Iqaluit, has actually increased to 1,500 animals from 900. He said environmental groups don't seem to want to take information like that into consideration when pressing their case.
"Life may be good, but good news about polar bear populations does not seem to be welcomed by the Centre for Biological Diversity," he said.
And I suppose he is right about the "poster-species" status of polar bears as posted on Suzuki's site in the "species at risk" section.

http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Impacts/ImperilledEcosystems/Speciesatrisk.asp
A receding Arctic icecap and earlier than normal breakup of sea ice has affected polar bears, which depend on sea ice to hunt seals. Recent studies showed polar bears in some regions were down a third in body weight. The latest generation of seals was also found to be much thinner than usual.
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Impacts/ImperilledEcosystems/
Why would the seals be thinner....I don't know. Maybe it's because there aren't enough polar bears to eat?