Our Soldier's Blood Is On Harper’s Hands

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
I'm not the one who brought it up. I never am. That must be your conscious speaking.
Actually you did, I responded along those lines to the original post. You attacked that sentiment. Therefore, you brought it into your post.
I understand you being defensive about it, that IS your conscious speaking, I enlisted and did my time, did you?
 

BitWhys

what green dots?
Apr 5, 2006
3,157
15
38
Actually you did, I responded along those lines to the original post. You attacked that sentiment. Therefore, you brought it into your post...

If that's supposed to mean I said something to you about the deaths of soldiers you're lying. If "along those lines" means in refence to the deaths of soldiers you just proved my point.
 

crit13

Electoral Member
Mar 28, 2005
301
4
18
Whitby, Ontario
yeah that's right. Liberal supporters were pleased as punch when that American fighter pilot blew them out of their foxhole.:roll:

have some respect:angryfire:

Have some respect is right. Placing them in harms way and giving them third rate equipment is a funny way of showing respect.

Playing partisan politics with soldiers lives is beyond disrespectful.

Grow up.
 

BitWhys

what green dots?
Apr 5, 2006
3,157
15
38
Have some respect is right. Placing them in harms way and giving them third rate equipment is a funny way of showing respect.

Playing partisan politics with soldiers lives is beyond disrespectful.

Grow up.

get a grip. even if I did do or say any of that crap it wouldn't justify anything.
 

fallenark

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
7
0
1
A i can say i stand bye my words that we need to fight. if we back out now wouldnt the soldiers lives who were lost mean nothing becuase are goal was never full reached? i have a a uncle and a cousin who are there fighting in the middle east right now and not one of them wants to come back becouse it woud be pointless. and of course they want to come back for x-mas and to see there familys and to live in peace again.also you say we are run bye bozo's which is true so the question why dont you do something about it, take a step forward and get word to the public? as i said early they do need to be stopped without a second thought but we are do it in a very bad way, we should have tooken are time and made better plans. we need the world behind us if we want to sucseed. today generation is going into another dark age and if we still havent confronted the problems now its scary what it will be like later one.also if my kid was being taught bye bozo's i would put another cookie in his lunch so maybe , jsut maybe he can get a smile and remeber why hes there, ethere that be good or bad. if i can make one person happy with a cookie that will be content with me. in my appinion we should drop out of iraq and but we should stay in Afghanastan. atleast im takeing a part in my country and not jsut watching everyone being dumbed down bye MTVand Glamour magazine and others of the sort. maybe one day kids will learn to pick up a book again and read a bit instead of picking up a video game controller.
 

fallenark

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
7
0
1
i made an error there we arent in iraq were in afghanastan sorry. its jsut sad were there becuase we a memeber of NATO and must respond becuase of sept 11th
 

daddyholland

New Member
Apr 19, 2007
35
0
6
My opinion right now is to say, "get our troops out of there now....F**K Afghanastan!" This is my feeling right now. But I would have to ask a question and it will probably sound naive but please someone answer: Why are we there in the first place? Besisde's Terroism....there are other motives for war in my book and I feel "terrorism" is too broad of a word nowaday's.