North American Unionization: U.S. and Canadian law enforcement interoperability

[Cannuck]

That was childish. I'm not trying to fight you. I know now that you'll hold a grudge on it for the rest of your life.



Did I really?(I don't remember it that way but your always right so) let me be the first to apologize.
I'm sorry.



Its like kindergarten all over again. That's from a post 6 months ago.
I'm sorry I said that. I apologize. I hope you'll get over it one day.

Is there anything more I need to apologize for? Just let me know.
I never wanted to cause you this much grief.

The way you seek me out on the forums feels like border line harassment.
I'm sorry I pissed you off, now can you ease up a bit mang?

You gotta learn to have fun with the blowhard.

 

[CDNBear]

let me be the first to apologize.
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry I said that. I apologize.

Accepted.

Would you actually like to discuss the OP at all?

You gotta learn to have fun with the blowhard.

Is that what you think you're doing? Is that why you get so upset when this lowly Injin makes you look stupid?

How's that worked out for you so far?

I always suspected you were a masochist.

I have to ask though, did you notice his apology? Who knew he was a better man than you.

You [CDNBear] just are that important to me

I know I am.

 

[Angstrom]

Accepted.

Would you actually like to discuss the OP at all?

I value Canada's Independence.
That's my stance on it.
I don't see why we need them to come over here.
I rather have them communicate to us and let our own police handle it.


As for the whole, North America Alliance.
I think its possible some select people want to lobby that.
There have been stranger things happen in the world.
But there are way to many obstacles in the way for it to become reality anytime soon.
I think that it's a bit of a leap to say that this is part of that. But anything is possible.

 

[CDNBear]

I value Canada's Independence.

Dude, you're talking to a patriot. I likely value it as much as you.

That's my stance on it.
I don't see why we need them to come over here.
I rather have them communicate to us and let our own police handle it.

That would be a great idea in a perfect world. But sometimes time lapses, give the upper hand to the criminal.

It's one of the reasons the MNR doesn't require a search warrant.

As for the whole, North America Alliance.
I think its possible some select people want to lobby that.
There have been stranger things happen in the world.
But there are way to many obstacles in the way for it to become reality anytime soon.
I think that it's a bit of a leap to say that this is part of that. But anything is possible.

Large changes, come in steps.

Who knows, one day it may happen.

I'd just rather not speculate using misinformation as part of the awareness program.

 

[Angstrom]

Large changes, come in steps.

Who knows, one day it may happen.

Would you be in support of that?

Done right it could wield a huge reward for both our nations. But
My trust in government has been so shaken that I have a hard time trusting they could pull it off.
I fear it would be put only to serve special interest, and not the general population.

 

[CDNBear]

Would you be in support of that?

Believe it or not, I'm reading some books right now, on Freemasons, and the Illuminati. Pertaining to a new world order.

Very interesting stuff. I think the authors have it all wrong. The common theme/premise being, it's an evil venture.

If it did actually exist, I think it may actually be benevolent.

But I digress.

Without knowing to what end, no.

Done right it could wield a huge reward for both our nations.

I agree, but nations are going to do what is ultimately best for themselves. The more powerful nation in the negotiation, is most likely to benefit the most.

But My trust in government has been so shaken that I have a hard time trusting they could pull it off.

You and me both dude.

I fear it would be put only to serve special interest, and not the general population.

I don't support the policies that make going to war ok to secure oil. But I sure can deal with the benefits.

Do you understand what I'm saying there?

 

[Angstrom]

Believe it or not, I'm reading some books right now, on Freemasons, and the Illuminati. Pertaining to a new world order.

Very interesting stuff. I think the authors have it all wrong. The common theme/premise being, it's an evil venture.

If it did actually exist, I think it may actually be benevolent.

I'd love to know why you think that.

I don't support the policies that make going to war ok to secure oil. But I sure can deal with the benefits.

Do you understand what I'm saying there?

I understand what you mean, but I don't like the resentment and hate its provoking in the innocent that are caught in the cross fire, then used as martyr's against us, or them. And most of all, I hate the idea of giving up liberty's, or giving goverment more control in the name of protecting us against them.

I'm open to new technologies, even if it means more effort on my part or less convenience.

 

[CDNBear]

I'd love to know why you think that.

Give me a bit and I'll start a thread.

And most of all, I hate the idea of giving up liberty's, or giving goverment more control in the name of protecting us against them.

I once thought differently. Now I agree.

I'm open to new technologies, even if it means more effort on my part or less convenience.

As long as it doesn't infringe on our rights.

 

[Angstrom]

Give me a bit and I'll start a thread..

Cool

As long as it doesn't infringe on our rights.

How so? Oh! n/m I understand