NDP Have BIG plans in BC again!!!

Are you going to vote for the NDP


  • Total voters
    1

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
Yes I read your link sig on campbell's drunk driving legislation at the "autonet" site :roll:

Well MADD has something to say about that. And don't start whining about the cut and paste.


MADD Canada>News>In the News>Premier 'Backed away' from Promises Says MADD




In the News

Premier 'Backed away' from Promises Says MADD
By Scott Deveau
The Tyee.ca
January 12, 2005


Two years ago Gordon Campbell promised Mothers Against Drunk Driving he'd make B.C. a beacon for their cause. But MADD rates B.C. even lower now, and its chief feels burned.

The month after Gordon Campbell tearfully apologized to the public for his drunk driving arrest in Hawaii, he met with leaders of Mother's Against Drunk Driving and issued a bold promise. Raising in his hand a copy of MADD's province-by-province report card, the Premier vowed his government would become one of Canada's leaders in toughening impaired driving laws.

That's the way Andrew Murie, CEO of MADD Canada, remembers the meeting, which included B.C.'s five MADD chapter heads.

But on the second anniversary of Campbell's apologetic press conference, Murie says the premier's promised leadership failed to materialize. Instead, Murie told The Tyee, Campbell has "shied away" and "chosen not to be involved" in drunk driving reforms.

Despite recent legislation passed by the B.C. Liberals, this province's drunk driving laws remain "a mockery" compared to most other provinces, Murie charges. If that means his organization didn't capitalize on the unique opportunity Campbell's arrest offered, Murie says B.C.'s news media deserves some of the blame.

'Wasn't enough outcry'

At the Feb 20, 2003 meeting with the Premier, Murie said, "We took him at his word and then the whole process basically slowed down from there."

On Jan. 11, 2003, the Premier's mug shot was displayed prominently on the front page of papers across the country. At the time, MADD was going for his jugular. The organization demanded he step down until the charges were cleared. But MADD just could not muster enough public support for its cause.

"There wasn't enough outcry from the citizens of British Columbia to step up to the momentum we had started. We made a demand and we had a fair amount of support, but there wasn't an onslaught to make him step down," Murie said.

Part of it was timing, Murie said. Campbell was a new premier pleading for a second chance and his handlers were able to convey the idea that he had only had one drink too many.

"Quite frankly, he had one bottle too many," Murie said. At a blood/alcohol level of 0.161 at the scene, 0.149 at the station, in the amount of time the Premier said he was drinking, "He drank the equivalent of two and a half bottles of wine that night," Murie estimates. The legal limit in B.C. is 0.08.

"One of the things we struggle with, because people always think, 'Well, I've been in the position where I've had one or two drinks too many.' So people can relate to that and some of the anger was downplayed."

Did media go light?

A Solicitor General's discussion paper released last year on impaired driving revealed a somewhat more tolerant attitude toward drinking and driving in the province when compared to other jurisdictions. Only 80 per cent of British Columbians identify drinking and driving as serious offense (compared to 86 per cent in Ontario and 90 per cent in Quebec).

More than 11 per cent of those surveyed admitted to drinking and driving in the previous two months while feeling impaired, which could translate into nearly 2.5 million trips by drunk drivers on B.C. roads each year.

Murie also said the media did a poor job in conveying to the public just how much Campbell had been drinking when he decided to get behind the wheel.

At the meeting MADD held with the Premier two years ago, the subject at hand was what Campbell planned to do to absolve himself of the mistake he made in Hawaii.

Now, said Murie, the Premier "avoids the issue. He won't talk about impaired driving. He won't deal with any of the bills dealing with it. A lot of the times he's not even in the house when these bills pass. He's passed that on to his two colleagues. He really shied away from it and chosen not to be involved."

The Tyee tried to reach the Premier this morning. His media people deferred all questions to Solicitor General Rich Coleman, who could not be reached by the time of publication. Coleman has defended B.C.'s new impaired driving legislation, telling the Province newspaper "We do what we can within the law and within the Charter."

MADD slams new laws

Earlier this year, Campbell's government introduced some reforms to the province's drinking and driving legislation, which were trumpeted as some of the stiffest drinking and driving laws in the country.

The legislation allowed for the immediate impoundment of an offender's vehicle and stiffer penalties for repeat offenders.

However, in October, when the reforms were announced, The Tyee's Barbara McLintock revealed the government's new legislation to be softer, with more wiggle room, than advertised in the official press release. The major reforms, like rehabilitation and ignition interlocks for repeat offenders, are up to the discretion of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles and have yet to be solidified in practice. No other province leaves impaired driving legislation practice up to its Superintendent. In other provinces, penalties are written into the legislation.

Insp. Norm Gaumont, head of Traffic Services in B.C., said he trusts the Superintendent will put some teeth in the legislation and bring B.C.'s impaired driving laws in-line with the rest of the country.

Until then, Murie says MADD is petitioning the Superintendent to set the standards high in the province.

"There is nothing wrong with the changes they made, in that they are a movement in the right direction, but they are far short of the leadership Premier Campbell promised," Murie said.

Premier 'backed away'

At their meeting two years ago, Murie said the Premier suggested stiffer penalties for those caught at the 0.05 level, like a mandatory 30 day suspension. "Which would have made a huge difference, but he backed away from it."

When it comes to the ignition interlock and rehabilitation reforms, Murie said, the B.C. Liberals actually went backwards compared to other provinces.

In the other provinces with rehabilitation programs, on first conviction a person is assessed for alcohol dependency. If they are found dependant, then they go into an alcohol treatment program and they can't get their license back until their alcohol or drug dependency is found to be under control.

B.C., on the other hand, won't implement either the interlock or mandatory remedial program until a person is convicted three times.

"Why would the rest of the country do it at the first time? Because there's proven, empirical evidence that it works, it intervenes. There is no cost to the government, so why are they waiting until the third time," Murie said. "Police only catch about one per cent of the impaired drivers in this country."

B.C. drops in MADD ranking

MADD was not the only group calling for such reforms two years ago after Campbell's arrest. The Canada Safety Council made similar suggestions for B.C., some of which have yet to be implemented.

Murie said the B.C. reforms are a "mockery" and MADD now ranks B.C. eighth in the country in drinking and driving legislation, down from third in 2000.

"We've been criticized that we haven't been tough enough [on Campbell], but what else could we do? He didn't follow through. His government didn't follow through.

"If you took the Gordon Campbell piece out of it, we would still be disappointed, so this is not personal vendetta or attack on the Premier, it's simply saying: 'You haven't done anything. You haven't done enough.'"
 

no1important

Time Out
Jan 9, 2003
4,125
0
36
57
Vancouver
members.shaw.ca
RE: NDP Have BIG plans in

*BC Taxpayers received a fair cash injection through the privatization of BC Rail ($1 bil)

He promised and said it a million times he was not going to sell BC Rail. He lied. One billion for a hundred year lease is not really a lot of money, either.

Ah, yes the raid at the legislature. tsk tsk

And for the record for people who do not know. The BC Liberals are not related to Federal Liberal. The BC liberals consist of old Social Credit MLA's /Social creditor's and Federal Tories, who disguise them selves as "liberals". Thats who they really are. Neo cons without the religion.

The rise in prices of oil,gold and copper, low interest rates that have stimulated our economy is nothing to do with Campbell. When the NDP were ousted our unemployment was lowest in 20 years. It is the world economy that is making us better not Campbell.
 

insignificant

Electoral Member
Apr 13, 2005
185
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Ok - let me start where I left off last night!!! Looks like there was a bunch of drunk lefties in here last night!

There is nothing progressive about being a corporate whore. As a member of the progressive movement I strongly object to your attempts to commandeer the word "progressive". Seeing that word be used by twisted regressives is disgusting.

So Rev doesn't think that a strong economy is important - Rev - Talk about spins - you can't even speak facts, you run on and on based on opinion, get your facts.

As for your union buddy NDPs - who are the UNIONS going to work for when the companies which employ them move to the smartest province in the country (Alberta)?

Pea said: Yes I read your link sig on campbell's drunk driving legislation at the "autonet" site

Well MADD has something to say about that. And don't start whining about the cut and paste.

The laws have been changed, if it isn't enough, then gov't must work to make pentalies stiffer - as for Campbell - give it up already - he owned his actions, he plead guilty, and we move on! This has NO BEARING ON HIS ABILITY TO GOVERN.

And for the record for people who do not know. The BC Liberals are not related to Federal Liberal. The BC liberals consist of old Social Credit MLA's /Social creditor's and Federal Tories, who disguise them selves as "liberals". Thats who they really are. Neo cons without the religion.

Who Cares - Lefties hated the Socreds then - they hate the liberals now - whats the difference? As for the name - I agree they should change their name to the Progressive Conservative Party of BC - that IS who they are! That is who I am too!

The rise in prices of oil,gold and copper, low interest rates that have stimulated our economy is nothing to do with Campbell. When the NDP were ousted our unemployment was lowest in 20 years. It is the world economy that is making us better not Campbell.

That stimulated the economy - YES - The Liberals allowed the economy to progress - unlike the NDP (via regulation, tax, and red tape).

Bottom line, I get the feeling that I am arguing with people who do not understand economics at all, and expect a platinum plated list of gov't services at someone elses expense.
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
Not hard to tell who is benefiting from Campbells tax cut around here :p That F..king bullshit never even covered the cost of renewing my drivers license :p Paid any fees latley Sig ?Unless your wealthy you got a tax increase plain and simple 8O If you even argue that fact we know which camp your in spin doctor :wink:
 

insignificant

Electoral Member
Apr 13, 2005
185
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Maybe you should work harder MRMOM and maybe you wouldn't be whining about an $80 licence renewal charge (oooooo $16/year). -Are you telling me that the tax cut for you didnt exceed $16/year.

How do you even afford to be on the internet?
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
So how much did the tax cut benifit you neocon prick Typical rhetoric from the right maybe you should work harder :evil:
The fact is brainwashed boy the tax cut did f..k all for low income earners it only benifited the wealthy 8O Lets just sell my kids future to the corporations .Hey i got a better idea lets just make them slaves right now cause thats were all this bullshit is going The Libs are going to make sure that happens even quicker. :x
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
I told you before I'm not Right or Left I'm not for the NDP they had their turn and screwed it up with their own corruption :x If you think the Libs aren't corrupt your fooling yourself as for communism its just another tool of the globalists :x Did you know right now in the state theres three former top level KGB officers helping the US with new internal passport 8O That shits coming hear don't kid yourself
 

galianomama

Council Member
Jun 29, 2004
1,076
1
38
Victoria, B.C.
whoa guys, what's happening here. sig, i'll take you on any day!

i have no intention of voting liberal, new democratic or green, but i do find it offensive that shots are taken to the 'little guy'.....

liberal's of bc as we all know, are not anything close to the federal liberal party, but they certainly seem to have a certain close 'spin' to the ol' social credit party which i fondly remember.......

i find it interesting how no one has mentioned the fact of when the liberals came to power in '01 they increased our deficit to such an amount that it was actually the largest deficit ever recorded in bc history - in order to give the wealthy corporations a tax break!

as far as the long term care beds go, we all know there is a terrible shortage on that front. that is old news.

the bc liberal government has removed 2,529 residential care beds from the system and added 1,065 assisted living beds. the trouble with that is the assisted living beds are to provide in-house service usually for about 2 hours a day - if that - so the person who looses on this deal is elderly. not impressive.
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
Talk about spin..they do more spinning that the cotton candy man at the circus. :p


Campbell Misled Public on NDP Finances

TheTyee.ca
Mere days after winning the 2001 general election with promises of honesty and accountability, incoming premier Gordon Campbell misrepresented the province’s finances by portraying the massive surplus he had inherited from the defeated NDP as an enormous deficit.
 

insignificant

Electoral Member
Apr 13, 2005
185
0
16
Vancouver, BC
do you think that you could balance the books instantly after the mess that the NDP left. That takes time - I think it's impressive how quickly they have turned the books around - I hope they continue to pay down our debt.
 

insignificant

Electoral Member
Apr 13, 2005
185
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Pea - that's a comical source of information by the way! I don't see factual information there - it is more opinion than anything else. Stick to the facts - goto the site
http://www.bccheckup.com

lets stick with actual numbers here - not some disgruntled NDPer

By the way - this website states all of the facts - even the ones which arent in the liberals favour
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
Again more right wing rhetoric :( If you don't beleave what we are saying you must be a nut job or stupid :lol: Sounds an awful lot like the Bush administration :p Whats next we don't like what you say were all terrorists Sig?
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
Really sig now where did he say he obtained the information???


His briefing binders, gained by The Tyee through an FOI, told him the opposite. From the freedom of information act, so you are saying that those blinders that your premier had to turn over are lies..that is quite a spin sig..
 

galianomama

Council Member
Jun 29, 2004
1,076
1
38
Victoria, B.C.
That takes time - I think it's impressive how quickly they have turned the books around - I hope they continue to pay down our debt.

yes, it has been very impressive how the liberal government has managed to 'turn the books around'. do you think that may have a price to pay? i think anyone who is aware of our health care problems, and by the way, you haven't answered me on those (you know - the removal of the long term care beds, etc.) - no worries - just when you get a chance!

and the fact that we were left with an incredible debt when they first came to power and decided the larger corporations deserved a tax break, where does that fit in?

i dunno, my 'brain waves' seem to tell me we have a wee bit of a problem here......



[/code]